kapten_bonk — CS2 Stats

76561198096202069[U:1:135936341]✓ No bans

2,257Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 Developing

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,023 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57

Positioning48

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–50Last 10050%Win rateLLLWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7

Aggression3.0

Utility6.1

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels0.2

Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7

Positioning4.8

Utility6.1

Mechanics4.4

Opening Duels1.5

Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time585ms−7ms

first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms

Headshot accuracy14.3%+0.2%

first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — mirage 13–11

13–2Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	36	24–12	67%	-0.01
ancient	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.04
nuke	D	15	4–11	27%	-0.02
cache	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.03
inferno	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.03
dust2	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.00
vertigo	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.04
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,674Matches

51%Win rate

0.85Avg K/D

64.0ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	593	54%	0.88	12.5
Ancient	271	53%	0.85	12.6
Nuke	208	52%	0.84	12.3
Anubis	164	48%	0.85	14.0
Inferno	154	49%	0.85	12.4
Dust2	117	41%	0.76	12.0
Overpass	47	57%	0.80	11.6
Cache	42	40%	0.88	12.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.0%Spray accuracy

69.7%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

589msReaction time

19.2%T opening success

42.3%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

10.4%Flash assists

5.79HE damage / grenade

12.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.0942% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 19.2429% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	6–13	-0.09	8%	27 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.00	23%	27 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	11%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	11%	26 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	15%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	12%	20 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	17%	20 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.08	23%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	11%	19 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.01	17%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.03	26%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	10%	19 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	-0.06	14%	18 Aug →
inferno	17–19	-0.08	12%	17 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.02	9%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	8%	16 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	9%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	5%	14 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	13%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.04	14%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	24%	13 Aug →
cache	19–22	-0.07	11%	13 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.06	9%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	19%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.06	15%	12 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	25%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.07	13%	11 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.00	7%	11 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.04	11%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.00	22%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.07	13%	11 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	17%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	17%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	10%	10 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	31%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	31%	10 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	13%	10 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.02	33%	10 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	-0.04	4%	10 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	33%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	11%	9 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	-0.03	22%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	18%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	13%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.06	8%	9 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	27%	5 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	23%	5 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	11%	5 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	15%	5 Aug →
vertigo	16–14	-0.00	16%	5 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	16%	5 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.07	9%	4 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.11	8%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	14%	4 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	19%	4 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.01	16%	4 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	12%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	24%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.04	20%	3 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	14%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.05	9%	3 Aug →
dust2	19–22	0.01	17%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	23%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	21%	30 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	12%	29 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	17%	29 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.09	14%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	25%	29 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	10%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	10%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.07	8%	28 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	6%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	22%	28 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	14%	28 Jul →
mirage	15–19	-0.05	18%	27 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.08	8%	27 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	13%	27 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	8%	27 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.03	16%	27 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	6%	26 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.04	9%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	18%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	22%	25 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.02	15%	25 Jul →
nuke	22–19	-0.05	13%	22 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.04	16%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	17%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.00	13%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.05	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	24%	21 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	4%	21 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.06	13%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.07	15%	21 Jul →