enyoy

enyoy — CS2 Stats

GB76561198094606652[U:1:134340924]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

490Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#61847 of 224821 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 5 Jan 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

20,985Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2025-01-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning45
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58375Last 10058%Win rateWWLLLWTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.5
Utility5.4
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time562ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 14 Jun
35%Best headshot accuracy · 16–19 · anubis, 12 Jan
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 4 Jul
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 21 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 26dust2Weakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2619773%0.02
anubisB136746%-0.00
ancientB126650%-0.02
infernoS128467%0.00
nukeA117464%0.02
trainA106460%0.02
dust2C83538%-0.04
cacheC52340%-0.01
overpass31233%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

786Matches
54%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
69.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1953%1.0914.3
Anubis1354%0.9113.7
Ancient1155%0.9212.1
Inferno520%0.6610.0
Nuke540%0.9113.6
Dust2425%0.8111.8
Train1100%1.0334.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
554msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
9.57HE damage / grenade
7.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7222% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–140.0330%28 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0014%28 Jul
dust21–7-0.120%26 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0123%26 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0630%26 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0722%26 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0426%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0218%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0220%25 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0518%25 Jul
anubis0–13-0.120%25 Jul
mirage13–110.0020%21 Jul
cache11–13-0.0129%21 Jul
mirage13–50.0016%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0222%21 Jul
inferno13–1-0.0312%21 Jul
mirage13–70.0719%12 Jul
cache8–130.0823%12 Jul
mirage13–110.0222%5 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0031%4 Jul
train13–70.0917%4 Jul
train13–70.0219%4 Jul
overpass4–13-0.0716%4 Jul
anubis8–130.0522%4 Jul
mirage13–40.1127%4 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0116%4 Jul
inferno13–100.0118%4 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0914%4 Jul
inferno13–20.1115%4 Jul
nuke13–80.0818%4 Jul
mirage13–30.1629%4 Jul
mirage13–60.0816%28 Jun
cache4–13-0.0731%28 Jun
train0–3-0.060%28 Jun
nuke8–20.0222%28 Jun
inferno13–110.0432%28 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0421%28 Jun
anubis13–20.0920%28 Jun
nuke5–130.0223%28 Jun
mirage12–120.0119%14 Jun
inferno13–90.0424%14 Jun
mirage13–10.1726%14 Jun
overpass13–8-0.046%14 Jun
ancient12–12-0.0417%14 Jun
mirage1–8-0.019%14 Jun
train12–120.0320%7 Jun
dust213–9-0.0216%28 May
nuke13–60.0526%28 May
inferno9–13-0.0016%25 May
ancient10–13-0.0321%25 May
dust29–13-0.0116%21 May
ancient13–30.0026%21 May
mirage13–100.0414%3 May
overpass10–13-0.0911%3 May
inferno13–7-0.036%3 May
dust26–13-0.0516%3 May
ancient7–13-0.0819%3 May
cache13–10-0.0715%3 May
cache13–5-0.0125%3 May
nuke13–70.0417%23 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0110%18 Nov
mirage13–9-0.0130%14 Aug
train14–160.0620%10 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0224%5 Jul
anubis11–130.0417%5 Jul
nuke13–80.0224%5 Jul
train13–110.0415%31 May
ancient9–13-0.0321%31 May
mirage15–15-0.0419%28 May
nuke11–13-0.0128%28 May
dust27–13-0.0115%28 May
mirage13–8-0.0611%27 May
anubis9–13-0.0421%26 May
nuke7–130.0229%26 May
anubis13–50.0317%26 May
ancient10–13-0.0119%26 May
mirage13–60.0715%26 May
train13–110.0222%26 May
dust213–11-0.0619%25 May
mirage13–30.0724%25 May
dust213–50.0324%25 May
ancient13–10.0714%25 May
nuke13–16-0.0115%25 May
nuke13–110.0123%25 May
train10–13-0.0614%25 May
train13–50.0326%25 May
inferno13–100.0529%25 May
mirage13–60.0116%25 May
train13–10.0520%25 May
ancient10–13-0.0616%19 Jan
mirage19–160.0222%19 Jan
anubis13–4-0.0124%19 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0816%19 Jan
anubis16–19-0.0535%12 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0115%11 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0118%11 Jan
dust210–13-0.0621%11 Jan
anubis13–90.0119%5 Jan
mirage11–13-0.099%5 Jan
anubis13–10-0.0221%5 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →