salmonTF

salmonTF — CS2 Stats

US76561198093151411[U:1:132885683]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

967Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating23,071Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41233 of 252478 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,071 +4,157 20 Jul – 10 Oct · 31 days played
18,91423,071peak 23,07120 Jul10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,200 +0 28 Aug – 8 Sept · 2 observations
1,2001,200peak 1,20028 Aug8 Sept
23,071Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,200Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,200
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,071
  • +1,310 over 30 days · improving
  • +4,157 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,929 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsalmonTFPREMIER23,071 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,200csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning63
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateWLLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch10.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time600ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 19 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 7–3 · rush_001, 3 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · anubis, 20 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
14–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 72% over 18ancientWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2813–1546%-0.01
cacheS1813–572%0.02
infernoB158–753%-0.02
mirageB136–746%-0.00
ancientC125–742%0.00
anubisS64–267%-0.01
nukeA53–260%0.02
rush_001—11–0100%0.04
office—10–10%0.03
boulder—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

34Matches
59%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
84.4ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

80%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3100%1.2715.7
Mirage1100%1.1011.0
Inferno1100%5.005.0
Cache1100%1.7017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
601msReaction time
44.4%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
9.46HE damage / grenade
4.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.1012%10 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.017%10 Oct →
dust29–130.0218%10 Oct →
mirage13–110.0819%6 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0419%4 Oct →
anubis6–130.0320%4 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0119%4 Oct →
rush_0017–30.0450%3 Oct →
mirage13–110.0323%28 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0025%20 Sept →
dust213–60.0018%20 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.1113%20 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0515%20 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0132%19 Sept →
inferno8–130.0220%19 Sept →
cache13–110.0214%18 Sept →
dust213–70.0226%18 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.048%18 Sept →
cache13–80.0214%15 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0117%15 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0416%10 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0516%9 Sept →
cache13–40.0520%9 Sept →
inferno13–80.0021%9 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0512%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.1232%8 Sept →
dust216–130.0115%8 Sept →
nuke13–70.0718%7 Sept →
cache15–150.0519%7 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0523%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0123%6 Sept →
dust213–20.0330%6 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0616%6 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0228%6 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0317%6 Sept →
dust29–130.0013%6 Sept →
cache5–13-0.038%6 Sept →
inferno13–100.0427%6 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.085%6 Sept →
dust213–60.0114%6 Sept →
cache13–110.0220%5 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0223%5 Sept →
cache13–80.024%4 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0314%4 Sept →
office5–130.0331%4 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0321%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0211%4 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0416%30 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0214%30 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0239%22 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.085%18 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0218%12 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0424%12 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0113%11 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0416%11 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0616%11 Aug →
dust216–140.0214%10 Aug →
inferno16–120.0310%10 Aug →
cache13–70.0726%9 Aug →
anubis13–100.0820%9 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0121%9 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0813%9 Aug →
nuke16–140.0318%9 Aug →
mirage13–100.0124%9 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0716%8 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.037%8 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0124%8 Aug →
cache13–30.0616%7 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0315%7 Aug →
dust211–13-0.1220%5 Aug →
dust213–50.0121%5 Aug →
anubis13–70.0119%31 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0116%31 Jul →
dust212–120.0319%31 Jul →
cache13–80.0625%30 Jul →
dust213–110.0120%30 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0120%27 Jul →
nuke13–110.0410%26 Jul →
ancient13–80.0227%26 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0316%26 Jul →
cache16–140.0220%22 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0521%22 Jul →
cache13–30.0831%21 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0119%21 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0511%21 Jul →
cache13–110.0116%20 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0322%20 Jul →
cache13–70.0314%20 Jul →
ancient13–50.079%19 Jul →
dust213–40.1622%19 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.097%19 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0132%18 Jul →
boulder13–70.0913%17 Jul →
ancient12–120.0833%17 Jul →
inferno13–40.0315%16 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0119%16 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0218%15 Jul →
dust213–50.0422%15 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0313%14 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0513%14 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.