hazey

hazey — CS2 Stats

GB76561198091896319[U:1:131630591]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,242Tracked matches69%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,666Purple band · top ~25.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,396 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,666 -590 3 Sept – 24 Sept · 3 days played
15,66616,256peak 16,2563 Sept24 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,396 +0 3 Sept – 9 Sept · 2 observations
1,3961,396peak 1,3963 Sept9 Sept
16,256Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,396Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,396
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 135 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 590 below peak (16,256)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,334 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhazeyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,396 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER15,666 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,396csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning52
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–36–7Last 10057%Win rateWWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 53% on T to 35% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.2
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time561ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–11 · fachwerk, 30 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 10 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 10 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 10 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10dust2Weakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2513–1252%0.00
anubisS1611–569%0.00
cacheA138–562%0.01
dust2C135–838%-0.02
infernoS128–467%0.02
nukeS107–370%0.02
ancient—42–250%0.03
office—21–150%-0.03
shelter—10–10%-0.06
eldorado—10–10%-0.07
fachwerk—11–0100%0.17
boulder—10–10%0.01
cbble—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

301Matches
53%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
75.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8143%1.0413.9
Ancient4544%1.2015.2
Dust24040%1.0415.4
Nuke3661%1.1415.6
Anubis3370%1.0615.6
Inferno2665%1.3516.7
Cache2370%1.1815.0
Overpass956%1.2514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
564msReaction time
53.1%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
6.52HE damage / grenade
12.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.3339% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–50.0326%1 Oct →
nuke13–80.025%1 Oct →
nuke13–30.0716%28 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0111%28 Sept →
cache2–13-0.056%28 Sept →
mirage13–80.0418%28 Sept →
anubis13–70.0017%27 Sept →
inferno13–100.0312%27 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0015%27 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0117%27 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0515%26 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.019%26 Sept →
cache13–110.0112%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0224%26 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0413%24 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0520%24 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0122%24 Sept →
cache13–100.0114%21 Sept →
cache10–130.0314%21 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.055%21 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0324%21 Sept →
anubis13–160.0018%20 Sept →
inferno13–90.0231%20 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0219%20 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0014%19 Sept →
mirage13–50.0532%19 Sept →
nuke13–60.0316%19 Sept →
anubis8–130.0640%19 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0426%19 Sept →
ancient13–30.0711%18 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0416%18 Sept →
inferno13–50.1023%18 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0429%18 Sept →
dust212–120.0821%18 Sept →
nuke6–20.1024%18 Sept →
shelter4–13-0.0626%18 Sept →
cache13–80.0120%18 Sept →
mirage13–80.0924%18 Sept →
inferno11–130.0219%17 Sept →
eldorado8–8-0.0718%17 Sept →
mirage5–130.0145%17 Sept →
anubis13–80.0815%16 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0721%16 Sept →
cache13–90.0221%16 Sept →
dust213–20.0224%16 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0319%16 Sept →
anubis8–130.027%12 Sept →
anubis16–19-0.0021%12 Sept →
inferno13–40.0513%12 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0721%12 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0420%12 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0427%12 Sept →
mirage13–30.0631%12 Sept →
ancient10–130.0719%11 Sept →
anubis13–110.0312%11 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0120%11 Sept →
inferno10–130.0320%11 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0427%11 Sept →
ancient13–100.0212%10 Sept →
mirage13–0-0.070%10 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.12100%10 Sept →
cache7–130.0423%10 Sept →
mirage12–30.0217%10 Sept →
mirage13–90.0421%10 Sept →
mirage7–11-0.0321%10 Sept →
mirage13–40.0722%10 Sept →
mirage8–130.0316%9 Sept →
mirage6–130.0235%9 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0412%9 Sept →
mirage3–130.0238%9 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0215%8 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0143%8 Sept →
inferno13–110.0621%8 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0512%5 Sept →
dust219–15-0.0123%5 Sept →
office9–13-0.0413%5 Sept →
office13–11-0.0233%5 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0417%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0233%4 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0733%4 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0317%4 Sept →
dust213–80.0217%31 Aug →
mirage13–80.0717%31 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0129%31 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0321%31 Aug →
nuke13–20.0823%31 Aug →
fachwerk13–110.1726%30 Aug →
boulder12–120.0119%30 Aug →
anubis13–50.0534%30 Aug →
cache13–50.0813%30 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0226%30 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0232%29 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0122%29 Aug →
nuke6–130.0015%28 Aug →
cache13–90.0223%28 Aug →
dust213–6-0.056%28 Aug →
cbble13–30.0624%28 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0230%27 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0322%27 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0032%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.