D-original

D-original — CS2 Stats

76561198081169389[U:1:120903661]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,424Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,736Purple band · top ~13.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88687 of 220724 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,338 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 14 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,736 +768 14 Jun15 Sept · 33 days played
13,31119,176peak 19,17614 Jun15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,338 +0 4 Sept6 Sept · 2 observations
1,3381,338peak 1,3384 Sept6 Sept
19,176Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,338Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-06-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,338
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 13 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 440 below peak (19,176)
  • +1,714 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,690 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,264 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGD-originalFACEITLevel 8 · 1,338 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,736 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,338csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning45
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57394Last 10057%Win rateLWLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 164 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.5
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.5
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time583ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy28.7%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.6% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 11–13 · nuke, 17 Jul
56%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · ancient, 12 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · nuke, 13 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 26 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 89% over 9infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2012860%-0.01
nukeB1910953%0.01
ancientC156940%-0.02
anubisA106460%0.01
cacheS98189%0.03
mirageA85363%0.01
infernoD62433%-0.02
train43175%-0.02
vertigo31233%-0.01
office21150%0.01
poseidon1010%-0.13
boulder110100%0.06
shelter110100%0.05
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,881Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.7ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24356%0.8412.9
Inferno2955%0.9613.5
Anubis2458%0.9616.0
Nuke1979%1.2615.3
Ancient1953%1.1117.9
Mirage1258%0.8913.8
Cache5100%1.3013.4
Vertigo20%1.1220.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.3%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
564msReaction time
36.4%T opening success
46.7%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
10.29HE damage / grenade
18.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4298% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–13-0.0335%15 Sept
nuke13–70.0324%14 Sept
poseidon2–9-0.1350%10 Sept
nuke13–80.0013%6 Sept
office13–80.0238%6 Sept
cache13–10.0824%26 Aug
dust213–11-0.0430%23 Aug
dust216–13-0.0134%23 Aug
dust216–14-0.0217%19 Aug
nuke13–110.0832%19 Aug
ancient8–0-0.0638%19 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0629%17 Aug
nuke13–50.0126%16 Aug
train5–00.0220%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0421%14 Aug
nuke13–50.1030%13 Aug
dust213–50.0523%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0519%13 Aug
train13–8-0.0340%13 Aug
ancient3–13-0.1128%9 Aug
anubis14–160.0028%8 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0424%8 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0021%7 Aug
dust213–8-0.0631%7 Aug
anubis10–130.0025%6 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0520%4 Aug
mirage13–30.0046%4 Aug
cache13–9-0.0143%4 Aug
dust213–110.0646%3 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0822%3 Aug
cache14–160.0119%1 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0124%31 Jul
anubis13–100.0625%31 Jul
vertigo5–13-0.0850%31 Jul
vertigo13–80.0329%31 Jul
vertigo3–130.0329%31 Jul
dust216–140.0127%28 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0631%28 Jul
nuke13–50.0224%26 Jul
nuke13–160.0240%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0529%25 Jul
dust213–16-0.0123%25 Jul
nuke13–100.0740%24 Jul
cache13–110.0234%24 Jul
mirage13–40.0229%24 Jul
mirage16–130.018%23 Jul
nuke13–80.0528%23 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0233%23 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0526%21 Jul
anubis13–60.0218%20 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0124%20 Jul
nuke13–50.0515%20 Jul
anubis5–130.0322%20 Jul
dust213–30.0423%19 Jul
nuke11–130.1631%17 Jul
nuke6–13-0.1115%16 Jul
mirage6–130.0321%15 Jul
cache13–100.0735%15 Jul
boulder13–50.0622%13 Jul
ancient13–10.1456%12 Jul
mirage13–50.0132%12 Jul
shelter13–60.0533%12 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0433%11 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0224%11 Jul
dust210–13-0.0433%11 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0438%11 Jul
ancient13–90.0128%11 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0335%11 Jul
inferno13–40.0119%10 Jul
ancient8–130.0337%10 Jul
office7–13-0.0028%10 Jul
dust213–40.0132%9 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0333%9 Jul
cache13–50.1122%9 Jul
cache13–60.0148%9 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0516%9 Jul
inferno15–150.0019%5 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0629%4 Jul
dust24–13-0.0816%3 Jul
cache13–5-0.0248%3 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0040%2 Jul
overpass13–1-0.0231%2 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0530%2 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0434%29 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0129%28 Jun
dust210–13-0.0223%28 Jun
dust211–13-0.0327%28 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0226%27 Jun
cache16–14-0.0323%24 Jun
dust213–5-0.0018%24 Jun
dust27–13-0.0330%24 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0230%24 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0412%23 Jun
mirage13–100.0421%23 Jun
dust213–9-0.0034%19 Jun
train12–12-0.0213%17 Jun
train13–6-0.0624%17 Jun
dust215–15-0.0026%16 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0228%16 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0127%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →