BOT Nerd

BOT Nerd — CS2 Stats

76561198080571950[U:1:120306222]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

124Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 124 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 28 Apr 2021. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 +8,100 7 Jul16 Sept · 16 days played
6,79815,370peak 15,3707 Jul16 Sept
15,370Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2021-04-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 370 below peak (15,370)
  • +117 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBOT NerdPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning45
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4753Last 10047%Win rateLLWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 690ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility3.8
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.5

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 654ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.5
Utility3.8
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time665ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 747ms → last ⅓ avg 665ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 9–7 · mirage, 11 May
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · ancient, 12 Aug
469msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · nuke, 12 Aug
16–4Biggest win · nuke, 15 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 25ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C28121643%-0.02
nukeA2516964%-0.02
mirageC156940%-0.03
infernoB115645%-0.02
ancientD93633%-0.05
anubisC52340%-0.04
cache42250%-0.06
vertigo1010%-0.08
overpass110100%0.01
train1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
92.4%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
654msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
7.73HE damage / grenade
5.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3794 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.14% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0621%15 Sept
cache9–13-0.0720%15 Sept
dust213–11-0.0017%3 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0724%3 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0417%3 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0514%3 Sept
dust211–13-0.0620%2 Sept
cache13–8-0.0422%2 Sept
mirage13–20.0136%2 Sept
inferno13–70.0232%2 Sept
inferno10–130.0039%2 Sept
dust213–7-0.0218%2 Sept
ancient7–13-0.059%30 Aug
dust22–13-0.0524%30 Aug
dust25–13-0.0625%30 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0631%30 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0616%30 Aug
anubis7–130.0011%14 Aug
dust211–130.0233%12 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0343%12 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0038%12 Aug
mirage10–130.0525%12 Aug
ancient13–100.0118%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0223%12 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0220%11 Aug
dust213–80.0325%11 Aug
inferno13–50.0215%9 Aug
dust213–70.0117%7 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0116%6 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0323%6 Aug
mirage5–13-0.045%6 Aug
ancient4–13-0.1428%4 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0425%4 Aug
nuke13–80.008%1 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0528%1 Aug
nuke13–60.0112%26 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0323%26 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0316%26 Jul
dust29–60.0424%24 Jul
dust211–13-0.0038%19 Jul
nuke2–80.0235%19 Jul
cache6–13-0.0810%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0719%18 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0819%18 Jul
cache13–4-0.0519%18 Jul
ancient13–4-0.049%18 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0332%15 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0218%11 Jul
dust22–13-0.0817%11 Jul
nuke13–11-0.059%11 Jul
dust25–13-0.0317%11 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0914%5 Jul
dust24–13-0.0430%5 Jul
dust21–10-0.0425%5 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0821%4 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0629%30 Jun
dust213–7-0.0429%30 Jun
dust213–8-0.0114%29 Jun
dust27–13-0.0030%28 Jun
dust213–11-0.056%28 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0319%28 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0416%28 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0422%20 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0221%20 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0443%14 Jun
nuke13–100.0220%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.0122%12 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0123%7 Jul
anubis6–13-0.1113%7 Jul
dust213–4-0.0132%7 Jul
mirage13–6-0.079%7 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0511%6 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0621%5 Jul
dust22–13-0.0817%5 Jul
dust213–20.026%5 Jul
dust24–13-0.0410%5 Jul
vertigo5–13-0.088%5 Jul
mirage8–13-0.097%21 Jan
anubis13–8-0.0319%21 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0319%21 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0826%15 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0320%14 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0531%14 Jan
inferno13–60.0536%14 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0233%14 Jan
mirage9–70.0710%11 May
dust27–9-0.0216%29 Apr
nuke1–90.0620%17 Jan
inferno4–9-0.033%12 Jan
mirage9–40.0120%5 Jan
overpass9–40.0113%30 Dec
dust29–70.0429%29 Dec
nuke1–9-0.0815%3 Oct
nuke5–160.0017%17 Jul
nuke16–50.0025%29 Jun
nuke16–60.0016%28 Jun
nuke16–40.0010%15 May
nuke16–60.0020%15 May
dust213–50.006%8 May
train10–160.0013%28 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →