___-_-___'NoFury___-_-___

___-_-___'NoFury___-_-___ — CS2 Stats

DK76561198079504165[U:1:119238437]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,945Tracked matches21%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,892Purple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15616 of 38258 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG___-_-___'NoFury___-_-___FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,892 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning50
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42571Last 10042%Win rateLLLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression5.1
Utility7.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.0
Utility7.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time562ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–4
130Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 58% over 19anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB29131645%0.02
ancientC2291341%0.01
nukeA1911858%0.02
cacheC1661038%-0.01
anubisD103730%-0.00
mirage3030%-0.04
dust21010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches
78%Win rate
1.58Avg K/D
87.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient771%1.6121.4
Inferno683%1.5017.3
Nuke475%1.8616.0
Vertigo367%1.7517.3
Anubis2100%1.2423.5
Cache1100%1.0022.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
573msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
43.4%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
10.30HE damage / grenade
13.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.1841% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–130.0222%28 Aug
anubis8–130.0219%28 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0236%28 Aug
ancient3–130.0317%28 Aug
nuke8–130.0121%28 Aug
nuke13–100.0613%28 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0624%24 Aug
ancient9–130.0419%24 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0316%24 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0123%23 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0111%23 Aug
inferno13–40.1327%22 Aug
ancient7–130.0317%22 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0124%22 Aug
inferno11–130.0127%22 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0013%16 Aug
inferno5–130.0317%16 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0724%16 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0015%16 Aug
cache1–13-0.0919%16 Aug
nuke16–130.0415%16 Aug
inferno13–100.0118%16 Aug
nuke13–30.0820%16 Aug
anubis4–13-0.058%16 Aug
cache5–13-0.0210%16 Aug
nuke6–130.0225%16 Aug
ancient9–13-0.1013%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0221%15 Aug
nuke8–130.0233%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.038%15 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0317%15 Aug
inferno13–30.1015%15 Aug
nuke5–1-0.027%15 Aug
cache13–7-0.039%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0120%9 Aug
inferno10–130.0722%9 Aug
cache7–130.047%6 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0617%6 Aug
mirage8–130.0124%6 Aug
inferno9–130.0022%6 Aug
ancient14–160.0423%5 Aug
cache8–13-0.0124%3 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0123%3 Aug
inferno13–110.1023%3 Aug
cache13–11-0.0116%3 Aug
ancient7–130.0212%3 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0315%3 Aug
ancient13–110.0216%3 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0412%3 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0213%3 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0213%1 Aug
cache13–00.090%1 Aug
nuke13–100.0215%1 Aug
ancient16–140.0320%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0526%27 Jul
inferno9–130.0024%27 Jul
ancient13–80.0519%27 Jul
cache4–130.0423%27 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0012%27 Jul
cache13–6-0.0210%27 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0124%27 Jul
nuke13–90.0314%27 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0115%27 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0021%27 Jul
ancient13–70.0224%26 Jul
cache3–13-0.0619%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0419%26 Jul
inferno8–130.0214%25 Jul
nuke13–10.0619%25 Jul
cache7–13-0.0535%25 Jul
ancient13–60.0416%25 Jul
inferno5–130.037%25 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0026%25 Jul
inferno13–80.0330%25 Jul
nuke11–130.0513%24 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1223%24 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0112%24 Jul
inferno7–130.0116%24 Jul
cache6–13-0.0326%24 Jul
inferno13–40.0419%24 Jul
nuke13–20.0124%16 Jul
cache13–70.0114%16 Jul
anubis13–100.0812%16 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0111%16 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0211%15 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0119%15 Jul
nuke13–100.0421%15 Jul
nuke10–130.0214%15 Jul
ancient13–50.0816%15 Jul
cache13–80.0129%14 Jul
inferno10–4-0.0224%14 Jul
ancient13–100.0110%14 Jul
dust210–130.0227%13 Jul
inferno13–60.0311%13 Jul
ancient13–50.0418%13 Jul
cache12–16-0.0617%13 Jul
inferno13–50.1116%13 Jul
ancient11–130.1126%13 Jul
inferno9–13-0.016%12 Jul
anubis6–130.0217%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →