dar — CS2 Stats

76561198078478413[U:1:118212685]✓ No bans

3,608Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,859Top 5% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#373 of 13486 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,546 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdarFACEITLevel 10 · 2,546 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,859 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning39
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56422Last 10056%Win rateWWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression4.1
Utility4.8
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning3.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time558ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — vertigo 6–0
132Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
W3Current streak
1312In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA32191359%0.00
anubisA1810856%0.00
ancientS1510567%-0.01
cacheA138562%0.01
dust2B115645%-0.01
nukeB63350%-0.00
inferno3030%-0.02
vertigo21150%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,398Matches
55%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
74.4ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage50356%1.0014.4
Anubis20559%1.0715.1
Ancient18756%1.0114.4
Dust211152%0.9514.6
Vertigo6146%0.9914.9
Nuke4248%0.9714.3
Cache3352%0.9815.1
Inferno2467%0.9313.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
571msReaction time
24.5%T opening success
42.1%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
6.19HE damage / grenade
8.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.5221% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0216%27 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0228%22 Aug
cache13–30.1326%22 Aug
dust22–13-0.0621%18 Aug
mirage13–110.0119%18 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0719%16 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0912%14 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0915%13 Aug
mirage0–2-0.020%12 Aug
cache13–80.0212%10 Aug
mirage6–130.0832%3 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0521%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0222%2 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0122%2 Aug
mirage9–130.0138%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0618%1 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0313%31 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0135%30 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0511%28 Jul
anubis13–100.0014%28 Jul
mirage13–30.0321%28 Jul
cache13–9-0.0046%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0131%28 Jul
dust213–9-0.0316%27 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0320%27 Jul
mirage11–130.0111%26 Jul
ancient13–90.0420%26 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0115%25 Jul
anubis13–60.0721%25 Jul
cache13–10-0.0326%25 Jul
anubis14–160.0116%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.037%22 Jul
cache13–100.0430%20 Jul
cache1–13-0.0922%20 Jul
mirage13–90.0919%19 Jul
cache11–130.0117%19 Jul
vertigo6–00.2524%19 Jul
cache13–9-0.0023%19 Jul
anubis7–130.0515%19 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0319%19 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0223%19 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0517%19 Jul
mirage5–130.0224%19 Jul
mirage11–13-0.049%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0623%18 Jul
mirage13–110.0317%17 Jul
ancient1–5-0.0329%12 Jul
cache10–130.0129%12 Jul
dust20–13-0.0350%12 Jul
anubis13–80.0927%12 Jul
ancient13–80.0317%11 Jul
nuke13–80.0122%11 Jul
anubis13–40.0312%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0521%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.0518%11 Jul
cache3–13-0.0127%10 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0320%10 Jul
mirage13–60.0217%10 Jul
dust213–30.0316%10 Jul
cache16–140.0313%10 Jul
dust213–110.0128%9 Jul
ancient13–70.0121%9 Jul
dust213–40.0532%9 Jul
cache13–90.0519%9 Jul
ancient13–30.0216%8 Jul
ancient13–80.0217%7 Jul
dust215–15-0.0115%5 Jul
anubis6–130.0615%5 Jul
mirage13–60.1214%5 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0425%5 Jul
mirage13–20.0614%5 Jul
mirage13–100.0722%5 Jul
inferno7–13-0.025%5 Jul
mirage15–150.0322%5 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0324%5 Jul
ancient11–130.0217%5 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0925%4 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0421%4 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0216%4 Jul
anubis2–00.000%4 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0716%4 Jul
dust213–100.0321%4 Jul
nuke13–50.0323%4 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0417%4 Jul
anubis9–130.0231%4 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0114%4 Jul
ancient8–13-0.075%3 Jul
nuke13–30.0931%3 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0418%3 Jul
dust211–130.0130%2 Jul
mirage13–110.0427%2 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0219%1 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0334%29 Jun
anubis13–60.0620%28 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0217%28 Jun
ancient8–130.0219%28 Jun
anubis6–13-0.1021%27 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0121%27 Jun
vertigo7–90.0022%21 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0012%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →