Hollevik

Hollevik — CS2 Stats

NO76561198075356933[U:1:115091205]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

825Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating19,304Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88404 of 239344 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 825 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 11 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,304 -1,302 22 Mar6 Sept · 19 days played
19,30421,086peak 21,08622 Mar6 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,245 +0 1 Sept6 Sept · 3 observations
1,2451,245peak 1,2451 Sept6 Sept
21,086Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,245Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-03-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,245
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 106 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,782 below peak (21,086)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 696 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHollevikPREMIER19,304 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,245csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning50
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateWWLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 672ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.2
Utility5.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time656ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–0 · inferno, 22 Jun
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · vertigo, 16 Apr
438msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 25 Mar
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 22 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 10nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C29121741%-0.01
infernoB23121152%-0.00
anubisC1881044%-0.01
mirageA116555%-0.01
ancientA106460%0.01
nukeD51420%-0.01
cache220100%0.01
train110100%0.07
vertigo110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

277Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
83.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3453%0.9515.2
Mirage3158%1.0914.7
Anubis3063%1.1916.2
Ancient2752%1.0817.7
Dust22255%1.0216.2
Nuke1060%0.9915.6
Overpass30%0.8416.3
Cache250%0.8712.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
658msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
10.74HE damage / grenade
6.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0273% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–9-0.0218%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0211%20 Aug
dust210–13-0.0322%22 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0316%22 Jun
inferno13–00.1127%22 Jun
dust214–16-0.0315%22 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0426%22 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0413%1 Jun
dust213–70.0621%1 Jun
dust20–10-0.0515%1 Jun
dust210–13-0.0528%31 May
anubis11–13-0.0015%31 May
dust213–30.0116%31 May
inferno13–90.0716%31 May
dust213–9-0.0514%29 May
dust211–13-0.0119%29 May
cache13–8-0.0218%29 May
dust211–130.0125%15 May
dust213–70.1030%15 May
dust213–20.0220%15 May
cache13–60.0418%11 May
dust219–170.0215%11 May
dust219–16-0.0416%9 May
dust213–90.0012%2 May
mirage13–70.0416%2 May
dust215–150.0214%2 May
inferno13–100.0614%2 May
anubis13–100.0120%2 May
ancient13–50.0527%2 May
dust213–160.0517%2 May
anubis11–130.0116%1 May
dust27–13-0.0822%1 May
ancient13–5-0.0521%1 May
inferno10–130.0519%1 May
dust25–13-0.0725%30 Apr
inferno13–80.0817%29 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0611%29 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0413%29 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0026%28 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0313%28 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0423%28 Apr
anubis16–120.0222%27 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0123%27 Apr
dust222–190.0422%26 Apr
ancient13–70.0224%26 Apr
dust25–13-0.0721%26 Apr
dust29–13-0.0410%25 Apr
dust213–80.0514%24 Apr
inferno13–5-0.067%23 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0315%23 Apr
inferno16–14-0.0619%23 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0411%20 Apr
inferno9–130.0021%20 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0528%20 Apr
dust210–13-0.0323%18 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0721%18 Apr
train13–70.0718%18 Apr
dust27–13-0.0621%16 Apr
ancient10–130.0321%16 Apr
vertigo13–60.0741%16 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0318%15 Apr
dust211–130.0327%15 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0213%11 Apr
mirage13–90.0312%11 Apr
dust214–16-0.0428%11 Apr
inferno23–25-0.0223%8 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0127%8 Apr
inferno16–14-0.0218%7 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0214%7 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0420%6 Apr
ancient13–50.0127%6 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0913%5 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0118%5 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0037%5 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0215%3 Apr
ancient13–80.0312%1 Apr
anubis3–13-0.028%1 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0218%1 Apr
anubis4–13-0.008%1 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0221%31 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0223%30 Mar
inferno13–60.0110%30 Mar
dust25–13-0.0323%30 Mar
anubis13–100.0214%25 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0613%25 Mar
nuke5–130.0222%25 Mar
inferno15–150.0015%24 Mar
anubis13–80.0215%24 Mar
mirage15–150.0423%24 Mar
inferno6–130.0338%22 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0020%22 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0425%22 Mar
dust213–8-0.0316%22 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0310%22 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0322%22 Mar
mirage13–90.0016%22 Mar
anubis13–4-0.0116%14 Mar
ancient16–140.0617%14 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0117%11 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0613%11 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →