slugy

slugy — CS2 Stats

76561198074461526[U:1:114195798]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,875Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,122 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,122 → 3,122
+61Tracked matches · now 2,875
+20.0ppWin rate · 30.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 10 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,640 +1,202 12 Jun13 Jun · 2 days played
26,43827,640peak 27,64012 Jun13 Jun
Faceit ELO: 3,122 +0 1 Sept3 Sept · 3 observations
3,1223,122peak 3,1221 Sept3 Sept
27,640Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,122Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-04-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,122
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 378 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-09-01
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGslugyFACEITLevel 10 · 3,122 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,122csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning63
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateWWWLLLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · +75ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility5.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning6.3
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time477ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 524ms → last ⅓ avg 477ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 21 Apr
67%Best headshot accuracy · 5–5 · inferno, 6 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · cache, 6 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 29 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
215In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32171553%0.03
dust2B28131546%0.02
infernoD93633%0.02
ancientD82625%0.02
anubisS75271%0.01
nukeD72529%0.04
cacheC52340%0.01
overpass41325%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,394Matches
60%Win rate
1.46Avg K/D
94.0ADR
64%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage43057%1.3919.7
Dust222762%1.4219.1
Ancient13555%1.4019.6
Anubis10453%1.3718.6
Nuke8756%1.3418.4
Inferno5358%1.3018.1
Overpass4363%1.3318.3
Cache3070%1.4819.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
480msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
10.38HE damage / grenade
6.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9608% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0916%16 Sept
mirage13–40.0927%15 Sept
mirage13–20.1036%15 Sept
ancient14–160.0225%12 Sept
cache14–16-0.0338%12 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0326%11 Sept
dust213–90.0123%7 Sept
anubis9–60.0239%7 Sept
inferno3–50.0116%7 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0326%7 Sept
anubis4–1-0.050%7 Sept
inferno5–50.0167%6 Sept
cache13–80.0312%6 Sept
inferno9–130.0124%6 Sept
mirage13–100.0126%5 Sept
mirage13–100.0126%5 Sept
mirage13–90.1120%4 Sept
mirage13–90.0826%4 Sept
ancient6–130.0125%4 Sept
dust26–13-0.0520%4 Sept
anubis7–130.0324%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0526%27 Aug
ancient9–130.0520%27 Aug
mirage17–190.0633%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0418%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0421%26 Aug
mirage10–130.0416%26 Aug
dust213–50.0128%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0425%24 Aug
ancient5–130.0123%24 Aug
dust28–130.0433%23 Aug
anubis7–130.0123%23 Aug
mirage13–70.0317%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0320%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0421%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0125%21 Aug
mirage14–160.0124%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0120%21 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0137%21 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0516%20 Aug
mirage10–130.1026%20 Aug
nuke14–160.0734%20 Aug
cache11–130.0420%14 Aug
inferno13–70.0434%9 Aug
dust211–13-0.0520%9 Aug
mirage12–160.0230%9 Aug
ancient10–130.0026%24 Jul
dust213–90.0633%22 Jul
cache0–10-0.030%15 Jul
nuke13–50.0321%15 Jul
anubis13–40.0526%15 Jul
dust213–20.1527%14 Jun
overpass13–100.0620%14 Jun
inferno13–70.0831%13 Jun
dust213–50.0228%13 Jun
inferno13–110.0717%13 Jun
dust216–130.0931%13 Jun
dust22–130.0150%13 Jun
dust211–130.0126%12 Jun
mirage13–60.1422%12 Jun
mirage9–130.0224%31 May
dust213–110.0519%31 May
dust25–13-0.0532%31 May
dust29–13-0.0014%29 May
ancient13–0-0.0123%29 May
mirage13–70.0130%29 May
mirage13–16-0.0026%25 May
dust23–13-0.0535%25 May
mirage13–100.0320%25 May
dust212–16-0.0227%25 May
dust213–50.0227%25 May
mirage10–130.0520%25 May
overpass7–130.0236%22 May
mirage14–160.0428%21 May
mirage13–100.0216%21 May
mirage9–130.0520%21 May
inferno2–130.0122%21 May
mirage5–130.0430%21 May
dust29–130.0619%21 May
dust25–130.0843%19 May
mirage13–70.0213%19 May
dust213–5-0.0314%19 May
cache13–80.0429%14 May
ancient12–160.0532%8 May
mirage13–30.0828%8 May
anubis13–30.0121%8 May
dust210–130.0523%8 May
dust24–13-0.0425%8 May
dust214–16-0.0420%1 May
nuke8–130.0330%28 Apr
dust213–9-0.0234%27 Apr
dust213–50.0628%27 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0220%25 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0131%23 Apr
overpass9–130.0120%21 Apr
nuke13–40.1826%21 Apr
ancient13–50.0720%16 Apr
nuke11–130.0424%10 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0120%10 Apr
dust213–9-0.0016%10 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →