jdo 💤 — CS2 Stats

76561198073287379[U:1:113021651]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,637Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating27,423Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3834 of 222394 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,073 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 27,423 → 27,423

0Faceit ELO · 2,073 → 2,073

+30Tracked matches · now 2,637

−17.3ppWin rate · 48.3% → 31.0%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 13 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,423 -788 20 Jun – 10 Sept · 13 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,073 +0 2 Sept – 10 Sept · 2 observations

28,333Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,073Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

46Days played since 2026-06-13

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,073
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 427 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

788 below peak (28,211)
-226 over 30 days · steady
-788 over 90 days
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,577 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-02
Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning67

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–53–3Last 10044%Win rateLWLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −74ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

8–12 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.4

Utility6.4

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels4.6

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning6.7

Utility6.4

Mechanics5.4

Opening Duels4.4

Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time524ms−42ms

first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms

Headshot accuracy20.8%+3.0%

first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 5–0 · inferno, 27 Jun →

57%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · cache, 12 Jul →

391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 28 Aug →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 11 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 14dust2Weakest map · 41% over 27

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	27	11–16	41%	0.01
mirage	C	25	11–14	44%	-0.01
cache	A	14	8–6	57%	0.00
nuke	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.01
inferno	B	11	5–6	45%	0.03
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.03
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00
overpass	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,224Matches

50%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

78.0ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	306	54%	1.11	16.5
Mirage	256	46%	1.03	15.2
Inferno	219	53%	1.10	16.7
Nuke	155	57%	1.06	15.9
Ancient	95	42%	0.98	15.8
Cache	86	55%	1.04	15.9
Anubis	72	44%	1.01	16.3
Overpass	45	49%	1.07	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.6%Spray accuracy

74.2%Counter-strafing

11.5°Preaim

521msReaction time

34.9%T opening success

60.6%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

8.9%Flash assists

9.48HE damage / grenade

12.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.9466% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	9–13	-0.01	32%	16 Sept →
cache	13–4	-0.02	22%	15 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	10%	15 Sept →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	34%	15 Sept →
inferno	20–22	0.00	12%	14 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	18%	10 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.02	25%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.06	23%	10 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.05	12%	9 Sept →
nuke	13–2	0.04	31%	9 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.03	21%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	13%	9 Sept →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	20%	8 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	4%	8 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	20%	8 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.02	22%	8 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	22%	8 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	15%	8 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.02	38%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	27%	29 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	19%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	20%	28 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	11%	28 Aug →
cache	12–16	0.02	18%	28 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.01	25%	26 Aug →
dust2	0–3	-0.01	50%	25 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	14%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.09	26%	24 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	17%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	13%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	19%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.07	17%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	17%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	16%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	19%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.07	21%	17 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	28%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.07	12%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	13%	14 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.06	16%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.08	24%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.00	19%	6 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	18%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	19%	30 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	18%	30 Jul →
nuke	25–22	-0.04	18%	29 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	13%	26 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.03	26%	24 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	25%	24 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.02	29%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.09	18%	22 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	15%	18 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.00	18%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.01	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	24%	18 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	24%	17 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	27%	17 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	16%	14 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.06	33%	13 Jul →
cache	0–13	0.02	57%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.01	19%	12 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	32%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.00	14%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	8%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	16%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.06	9%	11 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	15%	11 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.03	16%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.10	21%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.09	21%	7 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.03	26%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.03	17%	6 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	16%	4 Jul →
overpass	7–13	-0.02	21%	4 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.01	16%	4 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	18%	4 Jul →
overpass	9–13	-0.04	11%	3 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	15%	3 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.01	15%	29 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	23%	27 Jun →
overpass	7–13	0.01	15%	27 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.09	30%	27 Jun →
inferno	5–0	0.14	22%	27 Jun →
dust2	12–16	-0.03	21%	27 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	25%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.08	18%	24 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	12%	24 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	21%	23 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	25%	23 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	19%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.03	17%	20 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	11%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	15%	15 Jun →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	17%	13 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.00	15%	13 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.00	22%	13 Jun →