Jordanwhattt

Jordanwhattt — CS2 Stats

US76561198072365054[U:1:112099326]Steam profile ↗

2,399Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,134Pink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6948 of 18697 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,573 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJordanwhatttFACEITLevel 10 · 1,573 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,134 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning61
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51481Last 10051%Win rateLWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5
Aggression7.2
Utility6.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.1
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time557ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy25.9%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 29.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 5–1
131Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 72% over 18cacheWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2314961%0.03
anubisS1813572%0.03
cacheD1651131%0.01
mirageD134931%0.02
dust2S128467%0.04
nukeC104640%0.03
inferno41325%-0.01
train21150%0.05
debris110100%0.11
overpass1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,247Matches
50%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
83.5ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient32255%1.2617.9
Nuke17853%1.1918.1
Mirage15440%1.1317.3
Anubis15055%1.1616.8
Dust214143%1.0916.9
Inferno8337%1.0916.6
Overpass7548%1.1517.6
Train6959%1.4217.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
549msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
7.50HE damage / grenade
10.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7462% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–13-0.0629%24 Aug
anubis13–10.0426%24 Aug
cache13–50.0427%24 Aug
cache13–80.0628%22 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0820%22 Aug
anubis13–30.0321%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0229%20 Aug
ancient13–40.1243%20 Aug
ancient16–130.0529%16 Aug
ancient13–90.0322%16 Aug
anubis13–50.0615%15 Aug
ancient13–10.0326%15 Aug
anubis19–170.0427%10 Aug
anubis13–80.0632%10 Aug
mirage9–130.0022%9 Aug
nuke13–110.0622%9 Aug
mirage15–190.0126%9 Aug
ancient9–130.0616%9 Aug
ancient4–130.0524%9 Aug
ancient6–130.0229%8 Aug
anubis13–60.0124%8 Aug
dust27–13-0.0132%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0025%8 Aug
dust25–10.1317%8 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0021%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0932%6 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0436%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0123%6 Aug
cache14–16-0.0130%6 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0821%5 Aug
dust213–60.0427%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0135%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0820%4 Aug
anubis9–130.0524%3 Aug
cache9–130.0037%3 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0016%3 Aug
nuke9–130.1334%30 Jul
ancient13–160.0023%29 Jul
cache8–13-0.0427%28 Jul
dust25–13-0.0255%28 Jul
anubis13–70.0138%28 Jul
mirage13–60.0430%26 Jul
dust213–60.0429%26 Jul
nuke9–130.0426%26 Jul
ancient13–20.0436%26 Jul
anubis13–50.0328%26 Jul
ancient10–130.0236%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0028%25 Jul
dust216–120.1232%25 Jul
mirage9–130.1238%24 Jul
inferno13–30.1043%23 Jul
anubis13–110.0329%23 Jul
ancient13–90.0524%22 Jul
nuke16–120.0124%16 Jul
cache13–30.0524%16 Jul
cache11–130.0328%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0329%15 Jul
cache13–110.0127%14 Jul
ancient14–160.0122%14 Jul
nuke13–80.0237%13 Jul
dust213–110.0330%13 Jul
cache5–13-0.0014%12 Jul
debris9–50.1134%12 Jul
cache6–130.0337%12 Jul
cache13–90.0516%12 Jul
nuke13–80.0032%11 Jul
cache11–130.0129%10 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0333%10 Jul
cache11–13-0.0128%9 Jul
nuke10–130.0440%28 Jun
train11–130.0225%27 Jun
cache8–13-0.0216%27 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0121%23 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0125%22 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0430%21 Jun
dust28–13-0.0144%21 Jun
mirage13–80.1024%21 Jun
ancient13–30.1025%21 Jun
cache13–160.0123%21 Jun
cache7–13-0.0222%21 Jun
anubis13–100.0433%20 Jun
inferno11–130.0325%20 Jun
dust213–30.1250%20 Jun
train13–40.0924%20 Jun
ancient13–70.0123%20 Jun
ancient4–130.0127%20 Jun
anubis13–10.0624%20 Jun
anubis13–110.0421%19 Jun
overpass6–9-0.1047%18 Jun
nuke8–80.0331%18 Jun
inferno3–9-0.1116%18 Jun
mirage19–220.0029%18 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0442%18 Jun
ancient13–50.0146%18 Jun
dust216–140.0035%16 Jun
mirage19–22-0.0330%16 Jun
mirage13–50.0635%16 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0326%15 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0412%15 Jun
anubis13–50.0929%15 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →