✪ Twixx3r — CS2 Stats

US76561198071245466[U:1:110979738]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,463Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,375Purple band · top ~11% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7384 of 15141 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,134 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70

Positioning55

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–57–1Last 10042%Win rateLLWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.0

Aggression5.9

Utility5.7

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0

Positioning5.5

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time595ms−68ms

first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms

Headshot accuracy20.4%+2.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 10–13

13–1Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

15–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 57% over 21dust2Weakest map · 19% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	28	14–14	50%	0.01
ancient	A	21	12–9	57%	0.01
dust2	D	16	3–13	19%	0.01
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	0.00
cache	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.00
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
anubis	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.02
vertigo	—	3	3–0	100%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

358Matches

49%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

80.4ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	86	45%	1.09	15.4
Dust2	44	52%	1.14	16.6
Inferno	42	33%	1.14	18.4
Anubis	34	56%	1.18	16.4
Vertigo	32	56%	1.12	16.3
Nuke	20	55%	1.25	18.6
Ancient	19	74%	1.43	14.7
Train	3	67%	0.95	17.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.1%Spray accuracy

81.6%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

606msReaction time

28.7%T opening success

49.2%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

4.2%Flash assists

10.02HE damage / grenade

11.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.6696% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	2–13	-0.03	22%	28 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	31%	28 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	25%	26 Aug →
vertigo	13–3	0.05	26%	26 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	19%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	16%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	13%	24 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.00	21%	24 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	23%	24 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.02	22%	22 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.03	24%	22 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.01	16%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	15%	22 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.07	18%	22 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.02	19%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.01	14%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	20%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.00	17%	21 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	20%	20 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.05	13%	20 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.07	17%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	0.10	30%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	18%	18 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	14%	17 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.06	21%	16 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.03	21%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.03	29%	16 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.04	25%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–6	0.00	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	20%	16 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.06	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.02	28%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	25%	15 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	20%	10 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	19%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	16%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	23%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.04	8%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.05	14%	6 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	20%	5 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	11%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.12	20%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	15%	4 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.02	20%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	10%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.09	15%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.12	17%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.01	29%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.06	19%	2 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.07	20%	2 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	26%	1 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.02	20%	29 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.00	23%	29 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.02	16%	27 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.02	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	17%	27 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	16%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	13%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	13%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	12%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	21%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	18%	25 Jul →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.09	26%	24 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.07	8%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	14%	23 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	22%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	14%	18 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	19%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	25%	18 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	17%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	9%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.02	10%	18 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.04	25%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.07	21%	18 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	26%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	19%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	23%	17 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	7%	17 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	15%	17 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	13%	17 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.02	28%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	23%	16 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.00	27%	16 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.05	26%	16 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	15%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.08	14%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	9%	16 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.02	18%	15 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.02	17%	15 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	20%	14 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.01	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.09	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	11%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.00	17%	13 Jul →