TwinKing

TwinKing — CS2 Stats

ZW76561198069929000[U:1:109663272]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,474Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,915Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#38996 of 220571 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,474 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 24 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,915 -3,619 24 Feb12 Sept · 46 days played
21,17926,534peak 26,53424 Feb12 Sept
26,534Peak Premier in tracked matches
56Days played since 2026-02-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,619 below peak (26,534)
  • -780 over 30 days · declining
  • +953 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,085 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTwinKingFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,915 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning54
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateLLLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time565ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · cache, 25 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 14 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 14 Jul
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 18 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA28161257%0.01
mirageB26141254%0.01
ancientB178947%-0.02
anubisC145936%0.01
cacheS64267%0.02
dust24040%-0.02
nuke3030%-0.03
overpass2020%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,010Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
77.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3850%1.0213.7
Inferno3765%1.0215.7
Nuke1443%1.0015.5
Anubis1443%0.9516.9
Dust2956%1.0414.3
Ancient850%1.0815.1
Train2100%1.5218.0
Vertigo10%0.508.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
28.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.2%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
7.0°Preaim
560msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
12.30HE damage / grenade
10.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.622% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–130.0123%23 Aug
cache4–13-0.0624%22 Aug
mirage10–130.0132%9 Aug
cache16–140.0523%7 Aug
mirage11–130.0631%5 Aug
anubis13–80.0211%4 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0210%3 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0021%2 Aug
inferno13–110.0033%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0325%30 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0732%29 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0911%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0321%25 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0427%25 Jul
cache13–80.1534%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0317%25 Jul
dust210–13-0.0630%25 Jul
inferno13–80.0524%24 Jul
inferno13–30.0723%24 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0710%24 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0427%20 Jul
inferno13–110.0821%17 Jul
anubis10–130.0336%16 Jul
dust210–130.0233%16 Jul
cache13–40.0726%15 Jul
inferno6–13-0.115%15 Jul
mirage13–80.0324%15 Jul
mirage5–130.0450%14 Jul
ancient13–50.0239%14 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0027%10 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0230%10 Jul
ancient8–130.0317%9 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0125%3 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0426%2 Jul
anubis9–13-0.045%2 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0513%1 Jul
mirage13–50.0733%29 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0120%28 Jun
inferno13–40.0419%25 Jun
anubis6–130.0435%24 Jun
inferno13–100.0514%23 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0528%23 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0622%21 Jun
inferno13–10.1414%18 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0420%18 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0221%13 Jun
mirage13–70.0217%13 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0111%12 Jun
mirage9–130.0028%12 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0223%12 Jun
dust211–13-0.0126%11 Jun
mirage11–130.0417%11 Jun
mirage13–60.1424%11 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0230%11 Jun
inferno11–130.0026%11 Jun
ancient13–30.0531%10 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0126%10 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0025%9 Jun
dust212–16-0.0527%9 Jun
ancient13–100.0027%9 Jun
mirage15–150.0011%8 Jun
inferno13–100.0630%6 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0812%6 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0424%6 Jun
inferno8–130.0417%6 Jun
nuke11–130.0223%6 Jun
anubis12–160.0327%5 Jun
inferno11–130.0425%2 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0126%31 May
anubis16–14-0.0125%30 May
ancient13–50.0828%29 May
inferno7–130.0313%26 May
ancient3–13-0.066%26 May
anubis13–80.0224%26 May
mirage11–13-0.0235%26 May
inferno13–5-0.0313%25 May
ancient12–160.0319%24 May
inferno13–40.0627%24 May
inferno13–30.0215%20 May
inferno13–40.0144%17 May
cache8–13-0.0825%17 May
mirage13–16-0.0223%16 May
ancient13–11-0.0415%13 May
anubis14–16-0.0423%6 May
cache13–5-0.0225%30 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0217%2 Apr
anubis16–13-0.0124%2 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0022%2 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0540%29 Mar
anubis15–150.0219%28 Feb
anubis10–130.009%28 Feb
overpass2–130.0424%28 Feb
inferno5–130.0128%25 Feb
mirage16–140.0519%25 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0714%25 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0428%25 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0123%24 Feb
mirage13–110.0329%24 Feb
inferno5–13-0.118%24 Feb
inferno13–40.0224%24 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →