indih🥀 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198068932396[U:1:108666668]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

731Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,949Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAll-Rounder

CSDB Leaderboard#216294 of 232604 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 731

0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 18 Apr 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

27,584Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,629Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

46Days played since 2025-04-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	52.2%	44.8%	45.7%	above
Shot accuracy	20.7%	12.4%	12.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.87	1.04	1.05	0.18 short
Match win rate	41.3%	45.2%	45.7%	4.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning49

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–45–7Last 10048%Win rateWLWLLLTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

3–6–1 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

8–10–2 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.3

Utility4.9

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels3.9

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning4.9

Utility4.9

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time568ms−62ms

first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%−2.7%

first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 7 Jul →

48%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · cache, 6 Jul →

438msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 13 Jul →

13–1Biggest win · cache, 14 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

10–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 29% over 31

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	D	31	9–22	29%	-0.01
cache	A	20	12–8	60%	0.03
dust2	B	19	9–10	47%	-0.01
nuke	A	11	7–4	64%	0.01
overpass	S	9	6–3	67%	0.04
ancient	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.00
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10
rooftop	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
anubis	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

214,003Lifetime kills

0.87K/D

6,288Matches

41.3%Match win rate

52.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players

20.7%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players

14,047MVPs

6,949Hours (in match)

6,781Bombs planted

2,143Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4792,333

M4A4 / M4A1-S29,159

AWP27,649

P2000 / USP-S19,297

Desert Eagle12,359

Glock-185,099

P2504,672

Knife3,136

SG 5532,533

Five-SeveN1,910

Lifetime map wins

6,909dust2

5,049inferno

3,551nuke

3,474train

1,643cbble

1,127vertigo

67lake

56shorttrain

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,155Matches

51%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

79.6ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	77	58%	1.18	16.1
Nuke	50	68%	1.21	17.1
Ancient	38	45%	1.04	14.2
Anubis	27	41%	1.06	15.1
Dust2	23	57%	0.99	15.4
Overpass	8	62%	1.05	18.5
Vertigo	8	75%	0.82	12.3
Train	7	57%	0.95	16.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.8%Spray accuracy

77.3%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

564msReaction time

29.2%T opening success

49.6%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

6.5%Flash assists

5.81HE damage / grenade

9.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.1667% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–11	0.01	23%	16 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	21%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.08	22%	8 Sept →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	32%	8 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	24%	1 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	12%	29 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	13%	29 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	20%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	30%	26 Aug →
vertigo	9–3	0.10	20%	25 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	21%	25 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.03	24%	25 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	17%	25 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	22%	20 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	32%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	18%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	27%	14 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.01	4%	14 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.09	21%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	17%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	13%	14 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	30%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	15%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	18%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	12%	10 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.00	14%	10 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.05	39%	10 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.05	19%	10 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	9%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	17%	10 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.04	11%	8 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.12	31%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	32%	8 Jul →
inferno	12–12	-0.06	19%	7 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.18	23%	7 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	33%	6 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	48%	6 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.16	27%	6 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	24%	6 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.03	22%	23 May →
cache	11–13	0.07	32%	23 May →
cache	13–8	-0.01	30%	1 May →
cache	4–13	-0.01	40%	1 May →
cache	11–13	0.01	22%	1 May →
cache	11–13	-0.05	20%	1 May →
cache	7–13	-0.10	21%	1 May →
overpass	11–13	0.04	16%	27 Apr →
nuke	12–16	0.01	24%	22 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.00	34%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.02	23%	21 Apr →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	17%	21 Apr →
ancient	7–2	0.02	33%	5 Apr →
overpass	13–7	0.12	32%	5 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.01	18%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.01	22%	5 Apr →
nuke	13–4	0.03	15%	3 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.13	19%	3 Apr →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	12%	14 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	28%	29 Dec →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	39%	29 Dec →
overpass	9–13	0.05	21%	27 Dec →
dust2	13–5	0.01	32%	27 Dec →
nuke	9–13	0.06	24%	19 Dec →
dust2	13–10	0.07	25%	4 Nov →
dust2	13–11	0.05	25%	2 Nov →
dust2	13–7	0.01	22%	1 Nov →
rooftop	8–8	-0.00	29%	26 Oct →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	30%	25 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	38%	26 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	13%	26 Sept →
overpass	13–11	-0.01	17%	26 Sept →
overpass	10–1	0.10	26%	24 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	13%	22 Sept →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	12%	20 Sept →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	13%	20 Sept →
overpass	3–13	-0.06	13%	20 Sept →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	24%	20 Sept →
mirage	2–9	-0.09	25%	15 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.08	13%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.06	28%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.03	36%	13 Sept →
overpass	5–1	-0.02	8%	13 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	30%	13 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	21%	13 Sept →
overpass	13–4	0.08	31%	6 Sept →
mirage	7–13	0.11	18%	6 Sept →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	25%	6 Sept →
train	6–13	-0.06	10%	6 Sept →
mirage	16–13	0.05	20%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	28%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.00	40%	30 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	30%	28 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.03	26%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.05	30%	28 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	10%	23 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	38%	23 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	18%	23 Apr →
mirage	6–13	0.04	41%	18 Apr →
overpass	13–4	0.02	23%	18 Apr →
anubis	13–9	0.03	21%	18 Apr →