maetzN — CS2 Stats

DE76561198068616307[U:1:108350579]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

842Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,168Purple band · top ~11.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14897 of 32810 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning58

Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–52–5Last 10043%Win rateLWTWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression8.6

Utility4.4

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels4.1

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning5.8

Utility4.4

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact1.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time531ms−80ms

first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms

Headshot accuracy19.9%−4.3%

first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–0

13–0Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 17% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	32	14–18	44%	-0.01
inferno	D	19	4–15	21%	-0.00
mirage	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.01
cache	S	12	8–4	67%	-0.01
ancient	D	12	2–10	17%	-0.01
nuke	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
anubis	S	6	5–1	83%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy

41.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.6%Spray accuracy

78.4%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

533msReaction time

35.9%T opening success

56.6%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

10.83HE damage / grenade

3.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.5151 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.8962% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	6–13	-0.07	12%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	15%	26 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.03	27%	26 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	2%	25 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	6%	24 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.02	16%	24 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	20%	22 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	13%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	16%	21 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	14%	21 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.04	15%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	24%	20 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	35%	20 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	13%	18 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.06	13%	18 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.08	29%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	19%	17 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	17%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	16%	16 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	21%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	14%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	23%	15 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	31%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.04	19%	13 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.02	35%	13 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	15%	13 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.07	13%	12 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	16%	12 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.04	56%	12 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	15%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	32%	11 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.09	14%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	33%	10 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.01	16%	9 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.01	19%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–0	0.15	12%	9 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.12	4%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.04	25%	8 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	14%	8 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.04	26%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	19%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	18%	7 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.03	25%	7 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	22%	6 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.01	21%	6 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.04	28%	6 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	8%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.07	34%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	18%	5 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	10%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	28%	2 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.01	19%	2 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.05	24%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	23%	1 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	29%	1 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.01	26%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	18%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.04	17%	29 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	13%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.00	30%	28 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.06	20%	28 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	14%	28 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	14%	27 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.03	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	26%	27 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.03	11%	27 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	11%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.04	18%	26 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.01	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	14%	26 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.01	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.07	34%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–1	-0.05	16%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	38%	25 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	31%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.09	38%	23 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.07	28%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.10	17%	22 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	18%	22 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	33%	22 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	55%	21 Jul →
inferno	7–9	0.01	56%	21 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.10	7%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	24%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.02	18%	19 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	23%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	24%	19 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	25%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	26%	19 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	26%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	21%	18 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	22%	18 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.02	22%	18 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.01	22%	18 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.09	23%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.08	22%	17 Jul →