BoB

BoB — CS2 Stats

SE76561198067119372[U:1:106853644]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

573Tracked matches25%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,671Purple band · top ~13.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#93214 of 231935 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 912 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 8 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,671 +61 14 Jul20 Sept · 21 days played
18,48920,753peak 20,75314 Jul20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 912 +0 9 Sept20 Sept · 2 observations
912912peak 9129 Sept20 Sept
20,753Peak Premier in tracked matches
912Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-07-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 912
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 139 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,082 below peak (20,753)
  • -651 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,329 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBoBFACEITLevel 5 · 912 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,671 · Purple bandPEAK ELO912csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning44
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38593Last 10038%Win rateLLLLLLTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +69ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 091 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 5141 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time522ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 13 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · inferno, 17 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 12 Jul
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 1 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L6Current streak
103In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 12infernoWeakest map · 30% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2371630%0.01
ancientC1971237%-0.00
cacheC1661038%0.02
mirageB126650%-0.01
dust2C114736%0.02
anubisD93633%0.03
nukeC83538%0.01
vertigo110100%-0.09
train110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

128Matches
48%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
76.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3148%1.2715.9
Anubis2752%1.0915.3
Mirage2050%0.9213.2
Ancient1729%0.9515.3
Nuke1250%1.2316.6
Dust21060%1.2719.0
Cache540%1.1619.4
Train20%0.7612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
526msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
7.11HE damage / grenade
6.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.8018% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–130.0138%17 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0510%8 Sept
anubis8–130.0714%4 Sept
inferno7–130.0115%4 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0919%3 Sept
anubis6–130.0512%3 Sept
anubis12–120.0517%1 Sept
cache8–13-0.0210%1 Sept
cache6–130.0419%31 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0215%30 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0311%29 Aug
nuke11–130.0617%29 Aug
cache13–110.0419%29 Aug
cache13–9-0.0326%29 Aug
ancient13–110.0221%29 Aug
inferno11–130.0423%26 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0516%25 Aug
dust28–130.0123%25 Aug
mirage13–40.1126%25 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0115%24 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0121%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.039%16 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0113%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0121%16 Aug
inferno4–130.0221%15 Aug
anubis6–130.0218%15 Aug
cache6–130.0516%15 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0420%15 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0319%14 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0116%13 Aug
inferno13–60.1116%13 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0722%13 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0911%9 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0415%8 Aug
dust213–80.1113%8 Aug
nuke13–80.0913%8 Aug
dust213–110.0515%8 Aug
ancient9–130.1117%8 Aug
anubis13–40.0115%8 Aug
ancient13–100.0114%8 Aug
cache10–130.0525%6 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0911%6 Aug
cache13–8-0.0217%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0423%2 Aug
nuke13–50.0420%2 Aug
nuke5–13-0.1015%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0315%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0410%2 Aug
inferno5–13-0.019%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0220%1 Aug
anubis13–10.0920%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0216%31 Jul
cache13–20.0011%31 Jul
dust213–70.0224%31 Jul
anubis7–130.0813%31 Jul
inferno10–130.0820%31 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0513%31 Jul
ancient9–130.0618%31 Jul
dust213–90.0418%31 Jul
nuke7–130.0414%30 Jul
inferno8–130.0712%30 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0119%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0122%28 Jul
inferno9–130.0519%28 Jul
ancient13–110.0216%28 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0122%26 Jul
train13–40.0012%25 Jul
cache13–90.0322%24 Jul
mirage9–130.0218%19 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0118%19 Jul
cache9–130.0417%18 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0018%14 Jul
dust29–130.0830%14 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0119%14 Jul
cache8–13-0.0115%14 Jul
dust20–13-0.1019%14 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0223%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0415%13 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0130%13 Jul
dust210–13-0.0121%13 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0414%13 Jul
mirage13–80.0519%12 Jul
inferno10–130.0319%12 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0529%12 Jul
inferno12–160.0417%12 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0118%12 Jul
cache6–130.0019%12 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0612%11 Jul
ancient13–40.0112%11 Jul
dust210–130.0226%11 Jul
inferno8–130.0223%11 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0410%10 Jul
ancient13–50.019%10 Jul
inferno13–1-0.0019%10 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0321%10 Jul
cache10–130.0122%10 Jul
ancient13–80.0624%10 Jul
ancient12–160.0020%9 Jul
cache13–30.118%9 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0218%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →