foggers — CS2 Stats

AU76561198065830177[U:1:105564449]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,193Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.6 StrongHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,185 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning49

Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–42Last 10058%Win rateWLWWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9

Aggression5.4

Utility7.7

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning4.9

Utility7.7

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time505ms−22ms

first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms

Headshot accuracy23.0%+1.1%

first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — cache 13–2

13–1Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	33	21–12	64%	0.00
inferno	A	16	9–7	56%	0.03
nuke	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.01
dust2	S	9	6–3	67%	0.02
anubis	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.01
overpass	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.01
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.02
cache	S	5	4–1	80%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,857Matches

56%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

87.8ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	629	56%	1.27	17.6
Dust2	334	59%	1.33	17.7
Anubis	285	59%	1.26	17.2
Ancient	225	64%	1.29	17.7
Inferno	134	52%	1.09	14.6
Nuke	112	65%	1.21	15.1
Overpass	93	60%	1.37	16.2
Vertigo	66	55%	1.32	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy

37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.7%Spray accuracy

83.5%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

499msReaction time

23.3%T opening success

58.7%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

11.8%Flash assists

7.07HE damage / grenade

17.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.2791% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–9	-0.01	26%	28 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	33%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	31%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	39%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	25%	22 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.03	11%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.04	19%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	20%	18 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	25%	16 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.09	10%	13 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	11%	13 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	37%	12 Aug →
anubis	6–10	-0.01	22%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	21%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	24%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.02	20%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.05	24%	8 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.01	22%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.09	24%	7 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	20%	6 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	30%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	27%	5 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	23%	5 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	30%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.05	31%	1 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.22	26%	1 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.03	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.00	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.01	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	25%	23 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	21%	23 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	15%	22 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	21%	17 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	24%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	12%	17 Jul →
inferno	2–13	0.02	21%	17 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.04	26%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	25%	11 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	17%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.08	28%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.02	10%	12 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	19%	12 Jun →
overpass	6–13	-0.03	32%	12 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.01	20%	9 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	16%	9 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.04	22%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.01	29%	8 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.04	34%	8 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	10%	30 May →
inferno	13–3	0.06	42%	30 May →
inferno	13–10	0.03	15%	29 May →
mirage	9–13	0.07	15%	18 May →
mirage	13–7	0.04	14%	16 May →
anubis	13–9	0.01	17%	16 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	25%	15 May →
mirage	13–5	0.01	22%	15 May →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	26%	10 May →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	26%	7 May →
mirage	13–7	0.02	23%	6 May →
mirage	13–11	0.02	23%	2 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.12	13%	2 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	17%	2 May →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	15%	30 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.01	17%	30 Apr →
anubis	7–13	-0.13	14%	29 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	20%	29 Apr →
overpass	13–11	-0.01	18%	29 Apr →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	32%	27 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.00	21%	27 Apr →
mirage	5–13	0.01	24%	27 Apr →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	27%	19 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.02	21%	19 Apr →
overpass	9–13	0.01	18%	19 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.04	31%	19 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.01	16%	19 Apr →
anubis	13–7	0.05	20%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.01	31%	18 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.12	20%	18 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.12	20%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.01	31%	18 Apr →
overpass	7–13	-0.07	16%	18 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	19%	18 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.01	18%	15 Apr →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	4%	11 Apr →
overpass	13–10	-0.04	24%	11 Apr →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	23%	11 Apr →
nuke	14–16	-0.00	14%	11 Apr →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	14%	11 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	11%	11 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.01	39%	10 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.01	21%	9 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	32%	8 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	26%	8 Apr →
overpass	13–8	0.02	26%	7 Apr →
nuke	16–19	0.00	21%	7 Apr →
inferno	7–13	0.00	19%	7 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.02	24%	6 Apr →
nuke	13–2	0.05	16%	5 Apr →
inferno	13–16	0.02	25%	5 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.00	23%	5 Apr →