airscape ;c

airscape ;c — CS2 Stats

76561198064159181[U:1:103893453]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,813Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,704 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,704 → 3,704
+12Tracked matches · now 3,813
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 60 days played since 6 Aug 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,714 +1,992 3 Oct8 Nov · 4 days played
22,72224,714peak 24,7143 Oct8 Nov
Faceit ELO: 3,704 +0 29 Aug1 Sept · 4 observations
3,7043,704peak 3,70429 Aug1 Sept
24,714Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,704Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2024-08-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,704
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 296 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGairscape ;cFACEITLevel 10 · 3,704 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,704csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning57
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50491Last 10050%Win rateLWWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +10.4pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 49%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 40%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility5.5
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.7
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time542ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy31.3%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 31.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 3–1 · dust2, 9 Jul
75%Best headshot accuracy · 3–1 · dust2, 9 Jul
328msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · anubis, 3 Oct
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 5 Oct

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
814In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 26ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC38162242%0.02
dust2A26161062%0.04
nukeC104640%-0.01
ancientD62433%-0.01
infernoB63350%0.00
trainA53260%0.01
overpass43175%-0.02
anubis42250%0.05
vertigo110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

14,589Matches
56%Win rate
1.38Avg K/D
91.0ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
22Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage215052%1.3319.0
Dust2103351%1.3018.5
Nuke46749%1.3018.7
Anubis43246%1.2618.1
Overpass16358%1.3519.0
Train12758%1.5218.9
Inferno11858%1.3818.3
Vertigo10750%1.2518.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.9%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
527msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
11.6%Flash assists
5.53HE damage / grenade
6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6065% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0625%2 Sept
mirage13–70.0835%26 Jul
ancient13–20.0248%9 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0263%9 Jul
dust23–10.2075%9 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0116%26 Jun
mirage13–20.1324%24 Jun
inferno13–70.0238%24 Jun
dust213–10.1141%22 Jun
inferno9–130.0336%20 Jun
dust213–90.0744%20 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0419%13 Jun
mirage11–130.0239%17 May
mirage13–100.0223%16 May
dust213–11-0.0033%14 May
mirage16–140.0030%3 May
mirage3–13-0.0034%3 May
nuke6–13-0.0936%3 May
dust26–13-0.0718%3 Apr
nuke14–160.0220%3 Apr
nuke13–100.0915%3 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0325%3 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0235%3 Apr
dust213–70.0223%12 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0034%11 Mar
overpass13–80.0224%11 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0319%11 Mar
ancient13–50.0332%10 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0721%10 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0430%10 Mar
inferno8–130.0219%10 Mar
mirage13–60.0029%10 Mar
dust25–130.0027%10 Mar
inferno9–4-0.0133%10 Mar
dust25–13-0.0130%8 Mar
overpass16–13-0.0225%8 Mar
mirage12–120.0730%6 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0318%3 Mar
dust213–50.0623%3 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0721%3 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0340%3 Mar
mirage13–110.0111%3 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0223%3 Mar
dust29–130.0241%24 Feb
overpass13–90.0141%24 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0315%18 Feb
dust213–9-0.0130%16 Feb
mirage13–110.0530%9 Feb
dust213–60.0625%9 Feb
dust213–11-0.0140%9 Feb
dust211–13-0.0335%9 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0217%7 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0338%7 Feb
mirage14–160.0127%31 Jan
dust213–90.0837%28 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0140%27 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0722%25 Jan
mirage13–50.0624%21 Jan
nuke13–50.0144%4 Jan
nuke15–19-0.0129%30 Dec
mirage13–90.0216%18 Dec
inferno12–13-0.0343%28 Nov
mirage13–70.0425%28 Nov
dust210–13-0.0131%28 Nov
dust22–130.1747%20 Oct
dust213–50.0134%20 Oct
nuke13–160.0019%9 Oct
dust22–13-0.0419%2 Sept
train13–16-0.0217%2 Sept
mirage5–130.0740%1 Sept
mirage31–270.0423%17 Aug
mirage11–130.0330%16 Aug
dust28–130.0828%16 Aug
mirage11–130.0932%5 Aug
dust213–80.0534%29 Jul
dust213–100.0523%12 Jun
mirage7–130.0341%20 May
dust216–130.0432%6 May
mirage8–13-0.0029%23 Feb
train13–60.0228%28 Jan
train13–60.0228%28 Jan
train13–60.0228%28 Jan
train12–16-0.0229%23 Jan
mirage13–110.1032%8 Jan
anubis13–50.1232%24 Dec
mirage13–80.0227%22 Dec
mirage9–130.0738%21 Dec
mirage11–130.0329%17 Dec
mirage13–80.0427%8 Nov
anubis7–130.0616%18 Oct
mirage16–140.0230%18 Oct
dust213–50.0237%7 Oct
dust213–00.2023%5 Oct
vertigo13–8-0.0122%3 Oct
mirage13–160.0927%3 Oct
anubis13–80.1028%3 Oct
mirage3–13-0.0321%25 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0238%25 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0617%14 Sept
mirage7–130.0436%6 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →