Jannje Ost — CS2 Stats

DE76561198060242491[U:1:99976763]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

760Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.8 Learning

Premier CS Rating5,392Light Blue band · top ~76.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#43194 of 56659 tracked

FaceitLevel 3 · 597 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52

Positioning45

Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–54–6Last 10040%Win rateWLWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2

Aggression6.0

Utility3.5

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels2.3

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2

Positioning4.5

Utility3.5

Mechanics5.1

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact2.6

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.05

Reaction time623ms−111ms

first ⅓ avg 734ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms

Headshot accuracy16.8%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.06Best rating — nuke 13–8

13–2Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 50% over 14mirageWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	27	10–17	37%	-0.03
dust2	B	23	11–12	48%	-0.04
nuke	D	19	6–13	32%	-0.04
cache	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.02
mirage	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.05
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.05
anubis	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches

67%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

73.4ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	5	60%	0.79	11.6
Mirage	3	33%	1.04	15.0
Nuke	2	100%	1.00	10.5
Anubis	1	100%	3.67	22.0
Inferno	1	100%	1.35	23.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.7%Spray accuracy

72.7%Counter-strafing

12.0°Preaim

613msReaction time

29.3%T opening success

49.3%CT opening success

0.44Enemies flashed / flash

5.1%Flash assists

7.47HE damage / grenade

7.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4352 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.2901% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–10	-0.05	15%	30 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	20%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	13%	30 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	7%	29 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	18%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.09	2%	28 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.04	60%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	10%	28 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.07	23%	27 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.01	18%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	10%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.10	11%	26 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.09	18%	26 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.03	15%	26 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.12	33%	26 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.08	16%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	22%	25 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.04	4%	24 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.02	8%	23 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	19%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.01	15%	22 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.07	18%	21 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.05	15%	19 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.01	17%	18 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.03	9%	18 Aug →
nuke	2–9	-0.23	16%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.02	12%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.06	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	24%	16 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.10	11%	14 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	14%	13 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.09	21%	13 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.01	22%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	16%	12 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	15%	12 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	9%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	13%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	30%	10 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	6%	6 Aug →
dust2	1–13	0.02	23%	6 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.06	31%	6 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.02	22%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	22%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	34%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.04	7%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.09	21%	5 Aug →
inferno	2–9	-0.07	14%	4 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	38%	4 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	17%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.02	10%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	18%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.02	23%	3 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.08	17%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	19%	29 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.00	13%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.10	21%	28 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	8%	27 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	29%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.06	16%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.05	17%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.01	17%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	16%	26 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	16%	26 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.04	20%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	19%	25 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	12%	25 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.01	12%	22 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.12	22%	22 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	29%	22 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.04	9%	22 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	11%	21 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.00	27%	21 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.01	15%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	20%	20 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.04	28%	19 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.05	20%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	19%	19 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	14%	17 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	10%	17 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	28%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	19%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	20%	15 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	13%	12 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	22%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	15%	11 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	20%	11 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	9%	11 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	17%	11 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	9%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.04	8%	3 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	20%	30 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.10	9%	28 Jun →
nuke	12–16	-0.02	20%	28 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	28%	25 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	11%	25 Jun →
dust2	16–12	0.01	16%	23 Jun →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	12%	23 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	25%	22 Jun →