JMac

JMac — CS2 Stats

FI76561198050357467[U:1:90091739]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,042Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,498Purple band · top ~22.4% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 16 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,498 -1,490 16 Jun9 Sept · 18 days played
15,62921,152peak 21,15216 Jun9 Sept
21,152Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,487Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-06-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,487
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 44 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,654 below peak (21,152)
  • -1,490 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,502 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJMacPREMIER16,498 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,487csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning59
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50437Last 10050%Win rateTWLTTLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.0pp headshot accuracy · +75ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 113 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 433 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 20

  • 974 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.8
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.9
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time624ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–6 · nuke, 3 Sept
44%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 26 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · inferno, 11 Jul
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 1 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 16infernoWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB26141254%-0.00
infernoC2071335%-0.02
ancientC1871139%-0.02
mirageS1612475%0.00
cacheB115645%-0.02
dust241325%-0.02
vertigo220100%0.01
overpass110100%0.06
train1010%-0.00
anubis110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,396Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
79.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke22462%1.2417.7
Ancient21852%1.0516.6
Mirage16741%0.9615.5
Dust211544%0.9714.8
Anubis9539%0.9414.7
Inferno8348%0.9315.0
Vertigo6555%1.0615.6
Overpass6052%1.0115.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
599msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
9.18HE damage / grenade
13.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9933% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–8-0.0331%9 Sept
overpass9–70.0613%9 Sept
inferno6–9-0.1022%9 Sept
nuke8–80.0418%9 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0418%9 Sept
nuke7–9-0.0627%9 Sept
mirage16–130.0114%9 Sept
nuke16–14-0.0220%6 Sept
nuke9–60.179%3 Sept
inferno3–9-0.1213%3 Sept
inferno8–80.0931%3 Sept
nuke13–110.0331%3 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0511%3 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0529%3 Sept
cache13–7-0.0223%28 Aug
mirage16–130.0030%28 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0620%23 Aug
ancient7–130.0519%23 Aug
nuke13–70.0119%22 Aug
cache13–100.0122%22 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0529%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0615%18 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0019%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.1122%15 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0220%15 Aug
mirage13–90.0421%13 Aug
cache13–6-0.0026%30 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0819%30 Jul
inferno13–60.0723%13 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0419%13 Jul
ancient11–130.0229%13 Jul
nuke13–60.0521%12 Jul
cache8–130.0117%12 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0521%12 Jul
cache13–90.0019%11 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0623%11 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0822%11 Jul
cache13–10-0.0322%11 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0011%11 Jul
cache7–13-0.0522%10 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0413%9 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0122%8 Jul
vertigo13–7-0.0427%8 Jul
vertigo9–70.0635%8 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0038%8 Jul
train9–13-0.0024%8 Jul
ancient9–130.0310%6 Jul
nuke16–130.0122%1 Jul
inferno9–130.0119%1 Jul
nuke13–10.0943%1 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0021%30 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0020%30 Jun
nuke13–60.0028%30 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0329%30 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0330%30 Jun
inferno13–60.0820%29 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0110%29 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0224%29 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0311%29 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0215%29 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0320%27 Jun
inferno13–11-0.054%27 Jun
ancient13–70.0113%27 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0023%27 Jun
cache2–13-0.0444%26 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0722%26 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0120%26 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0716%26 Jun
mirage16–120.0127%26 Jun
cache2–13-0.0329%26 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0321%26 Jun
mirage13–110.0720%25 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0818%25 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0018%25 Jun
dust212–16-0.089%24 Jun
inferno13–100.0223%24 Jun
mirage5–130.019%24 Jun
dust213–100.0421%24 Jun
cache12–12-0.0022%23 Jun
mirage13–50.1319%23 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0014%23 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0542%22 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0432%22 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0613%22 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0213%19 Jun
dust22–130.0322%19 Jun
mirage13–100.0818%17 Jun
dust27–13-0.0621%17 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0624%17 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0124%17 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0210%17 Jun
ancient13–90.0513%17 Jun
nuke13–110.0116%16 Jun
nuke15–150.0119%16 Jun
inferno3–9-0.0539%16 Jun
mirage13–70.0217%16 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0211%16 Jun
anubis13–70.0215%16 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0413%16 Jun
inferno13–110.0615%16 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →