Mootland

Mootland — CS2 Stats

FI76561198044043521[U:1:83777793]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,379Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,251 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,379 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 1 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,121 +2,899 1 Jan18 Jan · 15 days played
13,22017,058peak 17,0581 Jan18 Jan
Faceit ELO: 1,251 +0 29 Aug19 Sept · 6 observations
1,2511,251peak 1,25129 Aug19 Sept
17,058Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,251Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-01-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,251
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 100 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMootlandFACEITLevel 6 · 1,251 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,251csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning39
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51445Last 10051%Win rateLWWLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −68ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 730ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 718ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim3.7
Utility5.3
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 699ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning3.9
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time684ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 687ms → last ⅓ avg 684ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–0 · inferno, 4 Jan
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · ancient, 8 Jan
453msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · mirage, 5 Jan
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 4 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
123In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 19overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC1971237%-0.03
mirageS1913668%-0.00
infernoA1810856%0.01
nukeB168850%-0.00
dust2B158753%0.01
overpassD51420%-0.01
cache4040%-0.01
anubis220100%-0.03
train220100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

513Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
78.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17448%0.9413.4
Ancient7853%0.9014.0
Nuke6552%1.0515.2
Anubis5753%0.9614.8
Dust25553%1.0114.3
Inferno5141%0.9113.9
Vertigo1136%1.0315.6
Cache1155%0.9214.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
25.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.0%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
699msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
9.73HE damage / grenade
7.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2877% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–130.0322%28 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0214%2 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0413%25 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0120%19 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0921%19 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0218%19 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0721%18 Jul
mirage13–10.0316%18 Jul
cache5–13-0.0223%18 Jul
inferno6–130.0131%7 Jul
mirage5–13-0.058%6 Jul
cache9–13-0.0416%23 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0215%22 Jun
dust213–100.0517%13 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0533%10 Jun
nuke13–60.0616%16 May
dust25–4-0.0127%14 May
cache8–13-0.0222%29 Apr
cache5–130.0227%29 Apr
ancient0–10-0.0938%28 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0728%27 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0515%22 Apr
dust210–13-0.0426%6 Apr
anubis13–100.0419%16 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0426%7 Mar
mirage13–80.0311%6 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0110%17 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0316%10 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0515%6 Feb
dust26–130.0118%31 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0921%31 Jan
mirage13–50.0013%28 Jan
inferno13–10-0.057%25 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0223%18 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0917%17 Jan
inferno13–40.029%17 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0217%17 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0213%17 Jan
mirage13–11-0.028%16 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0311%16 Jan
dust24–13-0.088%16 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0531%16 Jan
inferno13–50.0211%16 Jan
dust210–130.0217%16 Jan
inferno13–110.0222%15 Jan
dust213–100.0125%15 Jan
mirage10–130.0323%15 Jan
inferno10–130.0328%13 Jan
mirage13–110.0718%11 Jan
dust215–150.0214%9 Jan
dust213–7-0.0022%9 Jan
dust213–60.0215%9 Jan
mirage15–15-0.0222%8 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0415%8 Jan
mirage13–50.0625%8 Jan
nuke3–13-0.0615%8 Jan
ancient13–80.0139%8 Jan
train13–110.0026%8 Jan
inferno13–110.0026%8 Jan
ancient13–10-0.047%8 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0025%7 Jan
inferno13–40.0228%7 Jan
nuke13–70.0618%7 Jan
dust213–40.0515%6 Jan
ancient12–16-0.039%6 Jan
nuke8–13-0.042%6 Jan
dust210–130.0024%6 Jan
dust213–70.0423%6 Jan
ancient15–150.0225%6 Jan
ancient15–15-0.037%6 Jan
nuke9–130.0116%6 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0023%6 Jan
ancient1–13-0.0525%6 Jan
nuke13–60.017%6 Jan
inferno13–60.0616%5 Jan
mirage7–10.0014%5 Jan
inferno13–30.0522%5 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0714%5 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0311%5 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0318%5 Jan
overpass13–50.0820%4 Jan
ancient13–110.0417%4 Jan
inferno13–00.1532%4 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0124%3 Jan
nuke9–130.0325%2 Jan
mirage13–110.0119%2 Jan
ancient13–90.0021%2 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0410%2 Jan
nuke13–30.0633%2 Jan
dust213–70.0412%2 Jan
dust211–13-0.0117%1 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0134%1 Jan
train13–2-0.0118%1 Jan
nuke9–130.0425%1 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0327%1 Jan
nuke16–140.0316%1 Jan
ancient13–100.0035%1 Jan
inferno13–50.0325%1 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0323%1 Jan
overpass15–15-0.0226%1 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →