hawxx — CS2 Stats

DE76561198024842779[U:1:64577051]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

634Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport

CSDB Leaderboard#127994 of 230704 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 10 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,360 -2,601 12 Mar – 5 Jul · 15 days played

19,725Peak Premier in tracked matches

38Days played since 2026-03-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning42

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–55–4Last 10041%Win rateLWLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.06
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 459ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 481ms

Last 20

7–13 · 35% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 486ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.9

Utility6.4

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning4.2

Utility6.4

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04

Reaction time526ms−91ms

first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms

Headshot accuracy20.1%−1.5%

first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 21 Apr →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–6 · ancient, 20 Jul →

344msFastest reaction time · 0–10 · cache, 7 Jul →

13–2Biggest win · nuke, 22 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 33% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	40	17–23	43%	-0.03
mirage	D	24	8–16	33%	-0.03
cache	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.04
inferno	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.04
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.03
ancient	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.08
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.03
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

263Matches

51%Win rate

0.74Avg K/D

64.0ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	7	57%	0.92	12.9
Cache	2	50%	0.78	15.5
Mirage	2	50%	0.54	10.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.95	18.0
Anubis	1	100%	0.61	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy

33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.6%Spray accuracy

79.0%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

526msReaction time

25.6%T opening success

52.7%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

8.5%Flash assists

12.47HE damage / grenade

10.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.6184% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	1–13	-0.04	25%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.09	8%	26 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	30%	24 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	43%	24 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	19%	16 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	16%	16 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	22%	16 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	27%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.11	32%	15 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	6%	28 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	21%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	40%	20 Jul →
ancient	0–6	-0.11	50%	20 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	22%	20 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	13%	9 Jul →
cache	0–10	-0.09	6%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	29%	7 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	10%	5 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	10%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.07	10%	5 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	8%	5 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	13%	5 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	27%	1 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	11%	1 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	22%	12 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	19%	12 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.04	31%	15 May →
cache	13–7	-0.05	15%	14 May →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	9%	13 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.09	21%	13 May →
dust2	13–10	0.02	21%	13 May →
cache	6–13	-0.06	5%	7 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	25%	7 May →
mirage	10–13	0.02	7%	2 May →
cache	13–11	0.00	23%	2 May →
cache	7–13	-0.01	20%	30 Apr →
cache	13–10	-0.01	17%	30 Apr →
cache	11–13	-0.05	17%	29 Apr →
cache	13–10	-0.06	33%	29 Apr →
cache	12–12	-0.06	18%	28 Apr →
cache	13–16	-0.07	26%	27 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.03	14%	27 Apr →
train	0–6	-0.10	20%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	22%	26 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	26%	26 Apr →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	16%	26 Apr →
mirage	15–15	0.01	23%	26 Apr →
dust2	16–13	0.03	11%	26 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	10%	26 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	0%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	8%	24 Apr →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	9%	24 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	23%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	9%	24 Apr →
dust2	1–13	-0.09	40%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.01	22%	24 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	13%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–16	-0.02	8%	22 Apr →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	28%	22 Apr →
nuke	13–2	0.11	20%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.01	26%	22 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	14%	22 Apr →
inferno	13–11	-0.10	11%	22 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	11%	22 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	9%	21 Apr →
overpass	13–4	-0.01	31%	21 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.08	35%	21 Apr →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	14%	21 Apr →
nuke	13–2	0.07	28%	21 Apr →
overpass	13–6	-0.05	27%	21 Apr →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	32%	21 Apr →
mirage	6–1	-0.08	50%	21 Apr →
inferno	13–2	0.14	23%	21 Apr →
mirage	5–13	0.04	23%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.01	16%	18 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.07	17%	18 Apr →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	18%	17 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.03	24%	17 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	6%	17 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.01	10%	10 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.09	15%	7 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	17%	7 Apr →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	13%	7 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	33%	7 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	29%	4 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	21%	2 Apr →
mirage	5–13	0.01	12%	27 Mar →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	33%	27 Mar →
anubis	16–14	-0.06	21%	27 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.03	9%	26 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.01	27%	26 Mar →
dust2	7–13	0.05	22%	24 Mar →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	23%	24 Mar →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	17%	24 Mar →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	8%	15 Mar →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	36%	14 Mar →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	9%	12 Mar →
anubis	13–16	-0.03	34%	12 Mar →
inferno	5–9	-0.15	23%	12 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.01	23%	10 Mar →