she made tea for me

she made tea for me — CS2 Stats

DK76561198024526402[U:1:64260674]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,359Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,014Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64522 of 238960 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Aug 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,359 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 1 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,014 +700 1 Mar29 Aug · 16 days played
18,00321,544peak 21,5441 Mar29 Aug
22,212Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-03-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 530 below peak (21,544)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,986 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshe made tea for meFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,014 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning56
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateWLLLLWWLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −44ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time518ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 11–13 · dust2, 18 Apr
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 21 Apr
375msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · dust2, 24 Apr
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 21 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1912763%0.02
nukeS1711665%0.01
ancientB168850%-0.00
dust2B147750%-0.00
overpassD112918%-0.01
mirageD93633%0.00
anubisD61517%-0.01
office32167%0.02
vertigo21150%0.02
cache110100%0.04
sanctum110100%0.04
poseidon1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

996Matches
52%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
73.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno7464%1.1015.4
Nuke6664%1.0513.7
Dust26253%1.0815.4
Anubis4038%1.1016.8
Ancient3944%0.9115.3
Vertigo2955%0.9714.2
Mirage2658%1.0814.5
Overpass1942%1.0815.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
520msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
9.27HE damage / grenade
10.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.8979% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.025%12 Jul
inferno8–130.0615%12 Jul
overpass14–160.0317%29 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0431%25 May
nuke5–13-0.0914%25 May
mirage13–40.0911%23 May
nuke13–3-0.0216%10 May
dust26–13-0.0510%10 May
inferno15–150.0020%2 May
inferno13–60.0314%2 May
nuke16–13-0.0314%2 May
cache13–30.049%2 May
overpass13–80.0019%2 May
ancient13–7-0.049%2 May
dust26–13-0.0519%2 May
inferno13–100.0421%2 May
inferno13–50.0815%30 Apr
overpass10–13-0.069%30 Apr
inferno13–40.0319%27 Apr
nuke13–50.1025%24 Apr
dust213–40.0113%24 Apr
dust213–2-0.0414%21 Apr
overpass8–130.0312%21 Apr
inferno13–100.0541%21 Apr
overpass13–90.0417%20 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0229%20 Apr
office13–70.0535%18 Apr
dust211–130.1226%18 Apr
nuke13–50.1129%18 Apr
inferno13–4-0.018%18 Apr
mirage8–130.0013%18 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0212%18 Apr
ancient10–13-0.032%14 Apr
dust211–13-0.0010%14 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0226%14 Apr
ancient5–13-0.058%13 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0010%12 Apr
overpass12–16-0.0414%11 Apr
ancient1–13-0.0114%11 Apr
anubis13–110.0922%10 Apr
inferno13–70.0717%8 Apr
dust213–7-0.0317%6 Apr
mirage13–110.0529%4 Apr
vertigo7–90.0210%4 Apr
sanctum9–60.0422%4 Apr
dust28–13-0.059%4 Apr
poseidon5–9-0.0118%4 Apr
office9–13-0.0320%4 Apr
vertigo13–70.0311%2 Apr
ancient28–240.0215%31 Mar
ancient8–130.0115%29 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0010%29 Mar
inferno10–130.0334%29 Mar
ancient12–16-0.047%28 Mar
inferno13–60.0623%28 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0123%28 Mar
ancient13–90.0219%28 Mar
nuke6–130.019%27 Mar
ancient13–100.018%27 Mar
ancient13–100.018%27 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0217%24 Mar
dust213–100.1222%24 Mar
office13–70.0310%23 Mar
dust213–100.0332%19 Mar
anubis19–22-0.0117%19 Mar
inferno13–70.0618%14 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0513%14 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0134%12 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0610%12 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0318%12 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0518%12 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0215%8 Mar
inferno13–11-0.019%8 Mar
overpass20–22-0.0311%8 Mar
ancient13–50.0317%8 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0223%7 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0323%7 Mar
ancient11–130.0321%5 Mar
nuke10–20.0427%5 Mar
overpass15–150.0111%5 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0423%4 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0022%4 Mar
overpass7–130.0220%4 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0426%4 Mar
ancient9–130.0220%4 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0718%4 Mar
mirage13–40.0221%3 Mar
nuke13–60.1120%3 Mar
nuke13–100.016%3 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0131%2 Mar
inferno13–90.0139%2 Mar
inferno6–130.0124%1 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0617%1 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0311%1 Mar
dust28–13-0.0613%1 Mar
dust214–16-0.0315%1 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0021%1 Mar
dust213–80.0526%1 Mar
dust213–7-0.1015%1 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0310%1 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →