velo

velo — CS2 Stats

76561198018913946[U:1:58648218]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

839Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,937Purple band · top ~20.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 839 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 27 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,937 -2,761 13 Jun18 Sept · 14 days played
16,93720,429peak 20,42913 Jun18 Sept
20,527Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-05-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,492 below peak (20,429)
  • -2,156 over 30 days · declining
  • -3,492 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,063 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGveloFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER16,937 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning59
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44524Last 10044%Win rateLWLLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.9
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time552ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–6 · debris, 24 Jul
31%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 19 Jul
430msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · fachwerk, 23 Jul
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 19 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
129In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB20101050%0.03
dust2C1981142%0.04
mirageC135838%0.05
anubisB115645%0.01
ancientS96367%0.07
infernoD72529%0.01
nukeD62433%0.00
overpass42250%0.06
poseidon31233%0.08
fachwerk21150%0.04
vertigo2020%-0.02
boulder1010%0.04
debris110100%0.20
eldorado110100%0.03
stronghold1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

21Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
90.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%1.4522.7
Dust2333%0.8916.0
Anubis333%1.2220.7
Ancient250%0.8213.5
Inferno1100%1.2927.0
Train10%1.0618.0
Vertigo1100%1.2728.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
555msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
12.14HE damage / grenade
4.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5704% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–130.0218%14 Sept
cache13–70.0618%14 Sept
anubis11–130.0211%14 Sept
dust24–13-0.0018%12 Sept
dust210–130.0618%7 Sept
mirage2–130.066%30 Aug
overpass9–70.1117%30 Aug
anubis13–80.0513%30 Aug
dust25–130.0511%30 Aug
poseidon9–60.1816%30 Aug
dust211–130.0415%29 Aug
cache8–13-0.0017%29 Aug
nuke8–130.087%29 Aug
dust25–130.099%29 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0311%23 Aug
nuke13–70.0018%23 Aug
ancient9–130.0313%23 Aug
cache13–6-0.0026%22 Aug
mirage13–80.055%22 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0118%22 Aug
boulder7–130.0415%24 Jul
poseidon7–90.059%24 Jul
debris9–60.2022%24 Jul
fachwerk13–8-0.0216%23 Jul
vertigo4–130.0018%23 Jul
dust25–130.0324%23 Jul
inferno1–130.0317%20 Jul
nuke11–130.0119%20 Jul
fachwerk5–130.1020%20 Jul
ancient13–100.1214%20 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0214%20 Jul
dust216–140.0322%20 Jul
anubis9–13-0.019%20 Jul
cache13–50.1130%19 Jul
inferno16–140.0712%19 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0111%19 Jul
ancient7–130.1116%19 Jul
dust213–70.0710%19 Jul
ancient13–10.0519%19 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0131%19 Jul
cache13–11-0.0422%18 Jul
nuke13–160.0322%18 Jul
cache8–13-0.0416%18 Jul
ancient13–70.1615%18 Jul
mirage13–160.0120%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0513%18 Jul
dust210–130.0817%18 Jul
dust215–150.0316%16 Jul
eldorado9–70.0312%16 Jul
overpass11–130.1716%28 Jun
mirage16–140.1012%28 Jun
ancient16–120.0812%28 Jun
dust213–8-0.0212%28 Jun
overpass16–12-0.0514%28 Jun
mirage9–130.0311%28 Jun
inferno10–130.0013%28 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0710%27 Jun
mirage13–110.1314%27 Jun
dust213–10-0.0113%27 Jun
anubis7–13-0.009%27 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0519%20 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0311%20 Jun
mirage13–90.0513%20 Jun
anubis13–110.048%20 Jun
mirage11–130.0616%20 Jun
dust213–100.0214%20 Jun
ancient12–60.0222%20 Jun
dust214–16-0.0414%20 Jun
cache2–130.1214%13 Jun
dust213–110.0818%13 Jun
inferno11–130.0614%13 Jun
dust215–150.0316%13 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0417%13 Jun
cache8–130.0416%13 Jun
dust213–80.1213%13 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0010%13 Jun
mirage12–120.0413%13 Jun
ancient13–30.078%13 Jun
mirage9–130.0414%13 Jun
overpass12–160.039%10 Jun
anubis7–130.0025%10 Jun
cache13–50.0612%9 Jun
cache8–130.0115%9 Jun
cache13–110.0310%9 Jun
cache13–100.1319%9 Jun
cache10–130.0611%6 Jun
anubis16–12-0.0112%6 Jun
dust213–30.0717%6 Jun
cache4–13-0.0017%2 Jun
stronghold3–60.0212%2 Jun
cache13–110.0414%2 Jun
anubis8–130.039%2 Jun
poseidon7–90.0112%31 May
cache8–13-0.0313%31 May
cache9–50.0213%31 May
vertigo3–13-0.049%31 May
cache4–13-0.0116%27 May
cache13–20.1013%27 May
anubis13–9-0.019%27 May
cache12–120.0521%27 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →