rowelly

rowelly — CS2 Stats

76561198015193302[U:1:54927574]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,173Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,683 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,683 → 1,683
+16Tracked matches · now 1,173
−10.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 46.7%

Rating over time

1,683Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,683
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 68 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrowellyFACEITLevel 10 · 1,683 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,683csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning38
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–50Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +98ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.9
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.9° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning3.8
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time593ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 25 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 3 Aug →
414msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 6 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 58% over 12dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC2711–1641%-0.01
ancientB168–850%-0.01
infernoB137–654%-0.01
nukeA127–558%-0.01
mirageA127–558%-0.02
cacheA116–555%-0.03
dust2D72–529%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%-0.04
overpass—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,013Matches
52%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
67.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10951%0.9714.2
Anubis10457%0.9413.8
Mirage7951%0.8512.4
Nuke6555%0.9812.8
Inferno4544%0.8913.2
Cache4450%0.8312.1
Overpass3250%0.9713.2
Dust22429%0.8811.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.0%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
588msReaction time
12.9%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
15.0%Flash assists
8.19HE damage / grenade
8.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 12.9292% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.038%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0517%22 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.017%22 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0530%22 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0215%21 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.058%21 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0514%21 Sept →
anubis9–130.0223%18 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0313%18 Sept →
ancient13–80.0621%17 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0425%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0417%17 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0419%15 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0321%15 Sept →
anubis16–120.0215%15 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.097%14 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0014%14 Sept →
mirage16–120.0115%9 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0623%9 Sept →
nuke14–160.0119%6 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0126%6 Sept →
anubis13–100.0426%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0229%6 Sept →
mirage13–40.0219%5 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.090%5 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0414%5 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0111%5 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0417%4 Sept →
dust211–130.008%2 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0532%2 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0210%30 Aug →
anubis13–50.0411%30 Aug →
overpass13–50.0626%29 Aug →
dust213–40.0521%29 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0231%29 Aug →
dust213–50.0228%25 Aug →
inferno13–70.0921%25 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0815%24 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.0125%24 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0412%24 Aug →
anubis19–220.0120%23 Aug →
mirage13–80.0214%23 Aug →
nuke13–60.0128%19 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0219%18 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0317%18 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.039%17 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0618%16 Aug →
nuke16–130.0015%15 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0021%15 Aug →
anubis13–90.0121%15 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0218%13 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0626%13 Aug →
ancient13–110.0124%10 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0124%10 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.018%8 Aug →
inferno8–130.0013%6 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.016%6 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0213%6 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0726%6 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0418%5 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.039%5 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0125%4 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0225%4 Aug →
ancient13–60.0122%4 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0329%4 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0033%3 Aug →
ancient7–6-0.0425%3 Aug →
dust28–13-0.107%1 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0013%1 Aug →
nuke10–130.0420%1 Aug →
anubis8–130.0116%28 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0614%27 Jul →
ancient9–130.0118%27 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0217%23 Jul →
ancient5–130.038%21 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0417%20 Jul →
ancient9–130.0117%20 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.045%20 Jul →
inferno13–30.0615%20 Jul →
anubis16–19-0.0311%20 Jul →
cache13–3-0.019%19 Jul →
cache7–13-0.053%19 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0321%19 Jul →
anubis16–140.0630%19 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0313%18 Jul →
cache6–13-0.018%18 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0520%18 Jul →
cache10–130.0116%18 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0317%17 Jul →
anubis16–140.0116%17 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0915%16 Jul →
dust217–190.0120%16 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0320%12 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0313%12 Jul →
inferno13–30.0418%12 Jul →
ancient13–50.0215%12 Jul →
anubis12–16-0.0218%12 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0720%11 Jul →
anubis13–70.0320%11 Jul →
anubis13–2-0.018%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.