kAn

kAn — CS2 Stats

76561198014509299[U:1:54243571]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,169Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,937Top 25% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32794 of 257849 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Sep 2026 (29 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,169 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,937 +217 30 Aug – 28 Sept · 7 days played
23,60024,317peak 24,31730 Aug28 Sept
24,435Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2024-12-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 380 below peak (24,317)
  • +217 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,063 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkAnFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,937 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning54
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–35–6Last 10059%Win rateWWWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.8pp headshot accuracy · 0ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility7.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.4
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time511ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 19 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 7–3 · nuke, 5 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · cache, 5 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 13 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W3Current streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2819–968%0.04
anubisS1511–473%0.01
cacheS129–375%0.04
mirageC114–736%0.03
infernoA116–555%0.04
ancientD103–730%0.01
dust2B63–350%0.02
overpass—42–250%0.03
train—21–150%0.04
vertigo—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

609Matches
54%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
64.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis5353%0.9714.3
Nuke4367%1.1615.4
Vertigo3842%0.8512.5
Ancient2552%0.8813.0
Inferno1656%0.9013.9
Overpass1553%1.2416.7
Dust21145%0.8612.9
Cache3100%1.3113.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
513msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
12.76HE damage / grenade
15.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.775% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–7-0.0114%19 Sept →
nuke13–50.0218%19 Sept →
mirage13–70.0719%19 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0217%19 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0519%19 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0915%15 Sept →
anubis13–70.0726%15 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0019%15 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0118%14 Sept →
anubis13–70.0314%13 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0412%13 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0611%12 Sept →
dust211–130.0421%12 Sept →
mirage15–150.0318%12 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0418%8 Sept →
dust213–100.0228%6 Sept →
ancient7–130.1140%6 Sept →
anubis13–100.1127%6 Sept →
cache6–130.0026%5 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0029%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0627%5 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0020%5 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0521%5 Sept →
nuke13–90.1224%5 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0316%5 Sept →
inferno13–80.1218%5 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0317%5 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0320%5 Sept →
nuke7–3-0.0450%5 Sept →
nuke19–15-0.0814%2 Sept →
cache13–30.0218%2 Sept →
anubis13–80.0511%2 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0121%2 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0013%30 Aug →
ancient13–60.0620%30 Aug →
cache13–100.0415%30 Aug →
cache13–50.0211%30 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0425%30 Aug →
cache13–60.0419%30 Aug →
ancient5–130.1411%30 Aug →
cache13–10.1322%30 Aug →
overpass7–130.0826%28 Aug →
cache13–20.1424%28 Aug →
inferno12–120.0416%28 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0423%25 Aug →
dust213–20.0420%25 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0420%25 Aug →
cache13–30.1120%25 Aug →
inferno13–80.017%25 Aug →
dust213–50.0917%25 Aug →
mirage8–130.0224%25 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0311%25 Aug →
nuke13–50.1222%19 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.029%19 Aug →
nuke13–110.1720%19 Aug →
nuke13–50.0615%19 Aug →
inferno13–40.1625%18 Aug →
anubis0–10-0.0425%18 Aug →
mirage11–130.0718%18 Aug →
mirage8–130.0814%18 Aug →
nuke13–110.0618%18 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0223%18 Aug →
nuke13–20.0020%16 Aug →
nuke5–130.0417%16 Aug →
nuke12–120.0725%13 Aug →
nuke5–10.0124%13 Aug →
nuke11–130.0414%13 Aug →
nuke13–110.1415%13 Aug →
nuke13–00.1213%13 Aug →
inferno7–130.0118%13 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0023%13 Aug →
nuke13–70.0429%12 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0423%12 Aug →
inferno13–110.0811%11 Aug →
mirage13–50.0817%11 Aug →
overpass4–13-0.0620%11 Aug →
nuke13–1-0.0313%11 Aug →
nuke9–130.0421%8 Aug →
mirage13–50.0312%8 Aug →
nuke12–120.1125%8 Aug →
inferno13–100.1213%8 Aug →
inferno9–60.0513%19 Feb →
nuke8–80.0727%19 Feb →
nuke4–90.0329%19 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.058%18 Feb →
overpass13–80.0318%20 Nov →
inferno9–13-0.0315%2 Apr →
anubis13–60.0717%2 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0213%2 Apr →
ancient7–0-0.0320%2 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0415%2 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0211%7 Feb →
nuke4–130.0010%7 Feb →
anubis16–140.0215%4 Feb →
nuke13–50.0315%4 Feb →
train13–90.0715%21 Dec →
nuke9–0-0.096%21 Dec →
anubis13–30.059%21 Dec →
overpass13–50.0618%21 Dec →
train12–120.0125%21 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.