korvis 2.0

korvis 2.0 — CS2 Stats

76561198013385920[U:1:53120192]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

950Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,876Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#76905 of 221219 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 23 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,876 +604 23 Jun9 Sept · 17 days played
17,00720,000peak 20,00023 Jun9 Sept
20,499Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,317Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-06-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,317
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 34 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 124 below peak (20,000)
  • +604 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 124 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkorvis 2.0PREMIER19,876 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,317csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning58
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49483Last 10049%Win rateWWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +84ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility7.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.8
Utility7.4
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time510ms−94ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms
Headshot accuracy10.6%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 10.5% → last ⅓ avg 10.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 13 Sept
23%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · anubis, 24 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · nuke, 4 Sept
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 29 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2314961%-0.00
infernoC1981142%-0.02
ancientC1881044%-0.01
cacheD1441029%-0.02
anubisS139469%0.00
dust2D61517%-0.04
mirage330100%0.07
overpass31233%-0.03
vertigo110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

212Matches
55%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
90.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5450%1.0916.4
Ancient3063%1.1715.8
Anubis2955%1.0515.4
Inferno2744%0.9815.2
Nuke2065%1.1015.0
Dust21323%0.9213.8
Overpass757%0.8313.9
Train5100%1.3921.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.1%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
72.1%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
513msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
54.7%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
10.45HE damage / grenade
14.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.1125% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2558% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–20.189%13 Sept
inferno13–40.1014%13 Sept
ancient13–90.055%13 Sept
nuke7–20.1010%13 Sept
nuke13–10-0.034%10 Sept
cache13–8-0.0016%10 Sept
cache6–13-0.0612%9 Sept
ancient14–16-0.017%9 Sept
inferno13–50.019%9 Sept
cache13–11-0.055%9 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0421%5 Sept
mirage13–40.015%5 Sept
inferno13–70.035%5 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0717%5 Sept
cache6–13-0.0515%5 Sept
nuke13–60.0120%4 Sept
anubis13–11-0.044%4 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0216%4 Sept
nuke6–13-0.003%4 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0410%2 Sept
cache8–13-0.044%2 Sept
inferno13–70.0316%2 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0010%2 Sept
ancient13–11-0.008%2 Sept
nuke11–13-0.034%29 Aug
cache4–130.0114%29 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0014%29 Aug
anubis13–10-0.016%29 Aug
inferno13–10.0312%29 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0319%29 Aug
anubis13–100.1317%29 Aug
mirage13–30.0112%23 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0210%21 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0314%21 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0213%21 Aug
nuke13–10-0.018%21 Aug
nuke13–1-0.064%21 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0411%19 Aug
inferno9–13-0.072%19 Aug
nuke13–20.0611%19 Aug
anubis11–130.0410%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.089%19 Aug
dust213–9-0.0119%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0411%2 Aug
cache13–16-0.0116%2 Aug
ancient6–13-0.039%2 Aug
vertigo8–1-0.020%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0715%29 Jul
inferno15–150.0112%29 Jul
ancient3–13-0.029%29 Jul
dust23–13-0.063%27 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0210%27 Jul
anubis16–14-0.009%27 Jul
cache15–15-0.008%23 Jul
nuke13–70.018%23 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0314%23 Jul
ancient13–10-0.007%23 Jul
ancient4–130.016%21 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0412%21 Jul
cache2–13-0.0713%21 Jul
anubis13–6-0.033%21 Jul
cache7–13-0.0415%21 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0217%21 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0312%21 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0214%17 Jul
cache10–13-0.0512%17 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0015%17 Jul
nuke7–10.0916%17 Jul
cache13–80.036%17 Jul
ancient13–10-0.047%16 Jul
inferno4–13-0.089%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.039%16 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0312%16 Jul
cache13–40.0711%16 Jul
overpass16–120.057%3 Jul
dust213–16-0.0413%3 Jul
inferno5–13-0.066%3 Jul
nuke13–50.0112%3 Jul
nuke13–80.0112%3 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0514%30 Jun
anubis13–80.009%30 Jun
ancient13–9-0.039%30 Jun
inferno10–13-0.019%30 Jun
dust26–13-0.028%25 Jun
ancient9–130.0112%25 Jun
overpass4–13-0.090%25 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0912%25 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0618%25 Jun
ancient13–50.069%25 Jun
anubis13–80.0213%25 Jun
dust214–16-0.0116%24 Jun
anubis13–70.0123%24 Jun
nuke16–120.069%24 Jun
overpass10–13-0.066%24 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0011%23 Jun
inferno15–150.0017%23 Jun
nuke11–130.027%23 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0513%23 Jun
anubis5–13-0.009%23 Jun
ancient9–13-0.025%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →