Hokkaïd0

Hokkaïd0 — CS2 Stats

76561198012862659[U:1:52596931]Steam profile ↗

3,423Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating8.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,483Top 10% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#283 of 6708 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,159 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHokkaïd0FACEITLevel 10 · 3,159 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,483 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning59
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57376Last 10057%Win rateTTWWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1
Aggression8.6
Utility7.6
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.9
Utility7.6
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time579ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy27.8%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.8% → last ⅓ avg 27.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–1
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25151060%0.02
cacheS1913668%0.02
dust2C1761135%0.01
ancientB158753%0.02
infernoA95456%0.05
anubisA95456%0.03
nukeS65183%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,727Matches
56%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
80.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
29Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust222352%1.1216.2
Anubis21950%1.0716.8
Mirage19054%1.0315.9
Ancient17061%1.0917.3
Inferno13154%1.0915.6
Nuke11454%1.0915.5
Overpass8657%0.9815.5
Vertigo5853%1.1818.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.4%Headshot accuracy
42.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
608msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
63.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
11.6%Flash assists
11.85HE damage / grenade
10.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7706% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–12-0.0644%25 Jul
inferno12–120.1127%25 Jul
cache13–30.0230%25 Jul
anubis7–0-0.0750%25 Jul
mirage13–80.0331%25 Jul
cache13–60.0834%25 Jul
dust210–130.0926%25 Jul
mirage13–30.0224%24 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0520%24 Jul
mirage13–60.1323%22 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0338%22 Jul
cache13–10.0919%22 Jul
anubis8–130.0131%21 Jul
ancient13–30.0124%21 Jul
inferno13–60.1132%21 Jul
anubis9–20.1323%21 Jul
mirage9–130.0028%21 Jul
ancient13–50.1032%21 Jul
mirage13–90.0225%20 Jul
dust213–10.0627%20 Jul
mirage4–130.0833%18 Jul
dust25–10-0.0536%18 Jul
cache6–13-0.0216%17 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0329%16 Jul
cache13–60.0526%16 Jul
dust212–120.0523%16 Jul
cache13–80.0528%16 Jul
ancient13–60.0633%16 Jul
cache13–00.1231%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0428%16 Jul
ancient3–00.000%16 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0218%16 Jul
inferno13–40.1230%15 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0324%15 Jul
inferno13–30.0329%15 Jul
cache13–11-0.0219%15 Jul
anubis12–120.0629%15 Jul
cache10–13-0.0220%12 Jul
nuke11–130.1230%12 Jul
dust22–13-0.0436%12 Jul
cache5–00.0029%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.0326%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0519%11 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0627%11 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0413%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0128%10 Jul
nuke13–60.1430%9 Jul
cache8–3-0.0521%9 Jul
mirage13–50.0511%9 Jul
nuke13–110.0619%9 Jul
anubis13–10.1619%9 Jul
cache9–130.0126%9 Jul
dust23–80.1028%9 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0019%9 Jul
cache13–100.0530%9 Jul
ancient9–00.0830%8 Jul
nuke13–90.0832%8 Jul
ancient13–70.0722%8 Jul
mirage3–130.0331%8 Jul
dust213–11-0.0122%8 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0024%8 Jul
mirage12–120.0420%8 Jul
cache13–70.0221%8 Jul
mirage13–80.0120%8 Jul
cache5–13-0.0117%8 Jul
anubis0–5-0.0338%8 Jul
ancient1–13-0.057%7 Jul
mirage8–130.0423%7 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0016%7 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0324%7 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0324%6 Jul
inferno13–60.0321%6 Jul
ancient13–50.0715%6 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0139%6 Jul
dust211–13-0.0222%6 Jul
mirage13–9-0.1025%6 Jul
mirage12–120.0330%4 Jul
dust24–6-0.0126%4 Jul
cache13–50.0622%4 Jul
dust22–7-0.0027%4 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0134%4 Jul
mirage12–50.0929%3 Jul
mirage13–100.0424%3 Jul
ancient5–130.0026%3 Jul
inferno13–60.0635%3 Jul
dust213–11-0.0125%3 Jul
mirage13–40.0519%3 Jul
dust22–8-0.0540%3 Jul
dust26–13-0.0850%3 Jul
cache13–9-0.0024%3 Jul
mirage1–10-0.0540%3 Jul
dust213–110.0227%3 Jul
anubis10–130.0321%2 Jul
dust213–70.1019%1 Jul
cache2–130.0230%1 Jul
inferno9–130.0112%30 Jun
dust213–110.0836%30 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0629%30 Jun
ancient3–130.0329%27 Jun
inferno10–130.0519%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →