snaqi — CS2 Stats

76561198009185007[U:1:48919279]

1,485Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,485 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 4 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,263 +153 23 Apr22 May · 8 days played
19,11020,000peak 20,00023 Apr22 May
20,106Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-02-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnaqiFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning52
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41554Last 10041%Win rateWWLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −83ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time562ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–1 · dust2, 24 Apr
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 31 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 14 May
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 20 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 34% over 53
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D53183534%-0.01
infernoB178947%0.01
anubisC73443%0.01
cacheB63350%-0.00
nukeA53260%-0.02
ancientS54180%0.03
mirage41325%-0.02
train1010%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.07
warden110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (34% over 53). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

757Matches
53%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
70.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1953%0.9913.8
Inferno1553%0.9012.3
Dust21369%0.9113.3
Train1164%1.0616.8
Overpass757%1.1918.3
Mirage757%0.9914.0
Nuke617%0.7111.2
Ancient540%0.7410.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
68.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
556msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
10.81HE damage / grenade
9.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2563% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

34% win rate across 53 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–6-0.0123%11 Sept
cache13–11-0.0130%11 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0220%11 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0217%11 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0535%11 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0017%11 Sept
ancient13–40.1029%10 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0214%10 Sept
train8–13-0.0119%10 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0716%9 Sept
dust210–13-0.0015%9 Sept
dust25–13-0.108%7 Sept
cache6–13-0.0416%4 Sept
inferno13–90.0844%31 Aug
anubis13–90.0320%31 Aug
cache13–6-0.0133%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0315%23 Aug
dust28–13-0.0125%17 Jun
dust213–7-0.0512%5 Jun
dust20–130.0021%28 May
dust213–11-0.0322%28 May
dust28–13-0.0522%27 May
dust25–13-0.0316%24 May
dust213–30.0832%24 May
dust23–13-0.0316%24 May
dust24–4-0.046%23 May
dust28–130.0219%23 May
ancient5–13-0.0213%22 May
dust23–13-0.0818%15 May
dust26–13-0.0321%14 May
mirage11–13-0.0013%14 May
ancient13–100.0418%3 May
dust22–13-0.0811%30 Apr
cache11–130.0123%30 Apr
cache13–40.0519%29 Apr
cache2–13-0.0017%29 Apr
dust213–50.0123%27 Apr
inferno11–130.0315%26 Apr
inferno13–40.0111%26 Apr
dust213–11-0.0616%26 Apr
dust213–30.0415%26 Apr
dust28–130.0120%26 Apr
dust211–130.0214%25 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0511%25 Apr
dust213–70.1626%25 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0131%24 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0725%24 Apr
dust24–13-0.0521%24 Apr
dust29–10.2321%24 Apr
dust213–60.0527%24 Apr
inferno13–110.0131%24 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0118%24 Apr
nuke13–50.0320%23 Apr
ancient13–100.0720%23 Apr
dust25–130.0022%23 Apr
dust212–12-0.0611%23 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0518%31 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0711%31 Mar
dust213–60.0320%27 Mar
anubis13–40.1528%27 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0011%27 Mar
mirage13–80.0420%25 Mar
dust25–13-0.0518%24 Mar
dust29–130.0420%24 Mar
dust24–13-0.058%23 Mar
dust213–1-0.0019%20 Mar
dust213–10-0.0715%20 Mar
inferno16–130.0118%18 Mar
dust213–11-0.0315%12 Mar
dust213–3-0.019%6 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0911%1 Mar
warden13–70.0120%27 Feb
dust211–13-0.0518%27 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0113%26 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0819%26 Feb
dust24–13-0.0217%26 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0211%26 Feb
dust213–80.0619%26 Feb
inferno13–80.1422%26 Feb
dust212–120.0521%26 Feb
dust27–13-0.0616%25 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0211%23 Feb
dust21–6-0.0243%23 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0120%23 Feb
inferno13–70.0113%21 Feb
inferno12–12-0.0423%21 Feb
dust28–130.0314%21 Feb
dust27–130.0335%21 Feb
inferno8–130.0224%21 Feb
inferno9–130.0019%21 Feb
dust211–13-0.0217%20 Feb
dust27–130.0122%20 Feb
dust29–130.1025%20 Feb
inferno11–130.0933%19 Feb
dust213–11-0.0317%19 Feb
dust27–13-0.0413%19 Feb
dust213–80.0221%18 Feb
dust211–13-0.0417%18 Feb
dust212–12-0.0215%14 Feb
dust25–13-0.0325%4 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →