Palle Paltnacke

Palle Paltnacke — CS2 Stats

SE76561198008241301[U:1:47975573]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

580Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 580 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 24 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

1,621Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-01-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,621
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 130 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPalle PaltnackePEAK ELO1,621csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning34
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5248Last 10052%Win rateWLLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −51ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.9
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning3.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time564ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 12–4 · mirage, 14 Feb
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 29 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 8 Aug
13–2Biggest win · cache, 29 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
1711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29141548%-0.01
infernoS1711665%-0.02
dust2C146843%-0.03
nukeA127558%-0.01
ancientC114736%-0.03
cacheB63350%-0.02
overpass43175%-0.02
anubis32167%0.02
vertigo220100%0.02
cache_b2020%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

686Matches
52%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
70.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9050%0.9014.2
Dust24760%0.8813.1
Ancient4556%0.9414.4
Inferno4250%1.0514.1
Nuke3557%0.9014.5
Vertigo2650%0.8513.1
Anubis1828%0.8413.3
Overpass475%1.0315.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
71.6%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
554msReaction time
17.1%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
6.74HE damage / grenade
8.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.0628% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10-0.0416%5 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0328%5 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0819%5 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0121%5 Sept
dust213–9-0.039%29 Aug
cache13–6-0.0535%29 Aug
mirage13–7-0.018%29 Aug
cache13–20.0427%29 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0329%29 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0726%29 Aug
mirage8–130.0225%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0627%22 Aug
nuke13–160.0130%21 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0118%21 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0723%21 Aug
cache16–120.0114%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0116%21 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0122%21 Aug
cache14–16-0.0215%19 Aug
overpass13–6-0.0421%19 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0313%19 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0216%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0615%14 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0229%14 Aug
cache11–13-0.0422%14 Aug
overpass13–11-0.0322%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0824%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0318%8 Aug
mirage13–100.0025%8 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1019%8 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0428%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0127%8 Aug
inferno13–70.0229%13 May
vertigo13–90.0322%13 May
dust216–19-0.0328%13 May
mirage11–13-0.0220%13 May
inferno13–10-0.0421%8 May
cache13–16-0.079%8 May
mirage16–14-0.038%8 May
vertigo16–140.0120%30 Mar
nuke5–130.0816%30 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0217%28 Mar
dust213–11-0.0320%28 Mar
inferno13–50.0621%28 Mar
ancient13–110.0623%28 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0527%27 Mar
inferno16–140.0021%27 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0211%27 Mar
dust27–13-0.0815%27 Mar
ancient13–50.003%27 Mar
dust213–8-0.0127%27 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0417%27 Mar
dust213–110.0111%25 Mar
nuke11–130.0220%25 Mar
overpass12–16-0.0217%23 Mar
mirage13–80.0318%23 Mar
nuke0–13-0.0731%23 Mar
dust213–100.0011%23 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0218%23 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0212%22 Mar
inferno13–80.047%21 Mar
ancient5–13-0.089%21 Mar
dust24–13-0.0216%21 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0120%21 Mar
inferno10–130.0520%21 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0412%21 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0117%20 Mar
ancient13–60.0624%19 Mar
overpass13–110.0122%19 Mar
anubis16–130.0726%15 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0718%14 Mar
nuke13–50.0319%13 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0715%28 Feb
mirage11–40.0415%28 Feb
mirage13–60.0515%24 Feb
mirage13–110.0322%21 Feb
dust211–13-0.0625%14 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0112%14 Feb
mirage12–40.1031%14 Feb
cache_b15–19-0.0614%14 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0431%13 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0520%13 Feb
mirage6–13-0.1018%13 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0315%13 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0715%13 Feb
nuke13–6-0.049%13 Feb
dust211–13-0.0216%13 Feb
dust29–13-0.0811%6 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0119%6 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0213%6 Feb
mirage13–70.0321%6 Feb
inferno10–130.0219%6 Feb
dust213–11-0.0316%6 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0717%6 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0222%6 Feb
cache_b7–13-0.0115%3 Feb
mirage13–100.0221%3 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0115%24 Jan
nuke13–5-0.038%24 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0028%24 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →