General Kalle

General Kalle — CS2 Stats

SE76561198006754244[U:1:46488516]Steam profile ↗

1,084Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,486Purple band · top ~18.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10907 of 19578 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,331 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGeneral KalleFACEITLevel 6 · 1,331 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,486 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning52
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43534Last 10043%Win rateLWWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.6
Aggression5.2
Utility5.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 679ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning5.2
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time678ms+64ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 678ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–5
132Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C25111444%-0.01
nukeC1971237%-0.02
infernoB157847%-0.03
anubisD124833%-0.02
ancientB126650%0.01
mirageD62433%0.00
cacheA53260%-0.01
overpassA53260%-0.00
stronghold1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
56%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
76.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis862%1.1515.3
Inferno743%0.7010.9
Dust2450%0.9511.3
Nuke475%1.0614.8
Ancient450%1.1224.5
Mirage333%0.7811.3
Train2100%1.1817.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
27.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.9%Spray accuracy
71.6%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
679msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.02HE damage / grenade
9.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1833% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0123%16 Aug
dust213–2-0.0335%16 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0121%9 Aug
anubis9–130.1015%9 Aug
dust29–13-0.0219%6 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0622%6 Aug
cache13–50.0223%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0219%4 Aug
dust27–13-0.0618%4 Aug
dust26–130.0315%4 Aug
dust211–130.0640%4 Aug
nuke14–160.0118%4 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0924%30 Jul
dust211–13-0.0025%30 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0221%30 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0414%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.0510%30 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0615%29 Jul
ancient13–110.0514%27 Jul
anubis13–80.0218%27 Jul
cache4–13-0.0518%27 Jul
ancient8–0-0.0720%27 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0311%23 Jul
nuke10–130.0728%23 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0216%23 Jul
dust213–8-0.0519%21 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1121%20 Jul
nuke13–50.0120%20 Jul
inferno13–90.1024%20 Jul
ancient13–50.1530%20 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0211%20 Jul
cache16–13-0.0017%20 Jul
nuke16–14-0.009%20 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0618%20 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0226%19 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0328%18 Jul
dust213–110.0116%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0322%18 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0425%12 Jul
dust216–14-0.0223%12 Jul
cache10–130.0024%7 Jul
stronghold12–12-0.0330%7 Jul
cache13–11-0.0018%7 Jul
ancient13–40.1519%4 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0619%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.0019%3 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0429%3 Jul
mirage11–130.0216%3 Jul
ancient13–80.0016%3 Jul
overpass10–130.0220%3 Jul
dust213–70.0211%3 Jul
dust213–110.0421%3 Jul
inferno13–40.0117%3 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0410%29 Jun
dust213–9-0.0226%29 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0214%29 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0036%29 Jun
dust26–13-0.0517%29 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0320%29 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0917%28 Jun
nuke10–13-0.066%28 Jun
dust24–130.0119%25 Jun
inferno13–90.0229%25 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0631%24 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0816%24 Jun
dust213–40.0225%24 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0519%24 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0628%23 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0711%23 Jun
mirage8–130.0327%23 Jun
dust26–13-0.0423%22 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0410%22 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0221%22 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0515%21 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0523%21 Jun
dust210–13-0.0417%21 Jun
nuke8–130.0122%17 Jun
anubis0–13-0.020%17 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0627%17 Jun
dust28–13-0.0616%15 Jun
nuke13–60.0325%15 Jun
inferno12–160.0113%15 Jun
ancient12–160.0113%9 Jun
dust213–5-0.0125%9 Jun
nuke10–130.0330%9 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0220%6 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0719%6 Jun
overpass10–130.0120%6 Jun
inferno16–12-0.0221%5 Jun
overpass13–80.059%5 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0220%12 May
dust213–70.0316%10 May
anubis13–50.0134%4 May
ancient10–13-0.0419%4 May
nuke13–5-0.0217%4 May
dust213–70.0112%4 May
inferno13–10-0.056%3 May
ancient6–13-0.0613%22 Apr
dust210–130.0622%22 Apr
anubis13–16-0.0120%21 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →