gal iraker m/ ak-47

gal iraker m/ ak-47 — CS2 Stats

76561198006679030[U:1:46413302]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

523Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#98645 of 259655 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,031 +7,172 18 Nov – 24 Jan · 7 days played
11,85919,031peak 19,03118 Nov24 Jan
19,031Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2023-11-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgal iraker m/ ak-47FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning57
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWWLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility5.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time554ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 9 Jul →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 22 Dec →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 10 Jan →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 15 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 53% over 19ancientWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2613–1350%0.01
vertigoB1910–953%0.01
nukeC188–1044%-0.00
overpassB147–750%-0.01
ancientC125–742%-0.01
mirageC73–443%-0.03
dust2—21–150%-0.03
train—10–10%-0.02
anubis—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

582Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
74.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6260%1.0913.9
Vertigo4852%1.0814.7
Nuke3345%1.0014.6
Ancient2536%1.0215.3
Overpass1753%0.9715.1
Mirage825%0.7411.5
Dust2729%0.8113.1
Train2100%0.8912.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
556msReaction time
25.5%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
10.19HE damage / grenade
18.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1616° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10.0613%15 Oct →
nuke13–20.0119%29 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0711%15 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0320%8 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0713%8 Sept →
nuke13–70.0317%8 Sept →
inferno16–19-0.0212%1 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0411%1 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0626%1 Sept →
inferno10–130.0423%15 Nov →
nuke13–100.0421%15 Nov →
train5–13-0.0221%15 Nov →
inferno13–30.006%17 Dec →
dust213–90.0021%5 Dec →
nuke3–13-0.1014%3 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0218%7 Nov →
nuke4–13-0.0014%1 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.057%18 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0213%23 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0623%18 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0419%9 Jul →
ancient13–60.1014%9 Jul →
mirage13–2-0.045%30 Jun →
inferno13–110.0113%30 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0024%18 Jun →
nuke13–110.0129%11 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0828%11 Jun →
inferno13–70.0216%2 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0614%5 May →
inferno13–8-0.0321%2 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0316%27 Mar →
overpass3–13-0.0815%12 Mar →
vertigo13–110.0130%12 Mar →
ancient10–130.0014%8 Mar →
overpass13–10-0.0324%8 Mar →
overpass13–3-0.0115%8 Mar →
ancient10–130.000%8 Mar →
vertigo6–13-0.0513%8 Mar →
nuke7–130.0822%6 Mar →
overpass10–130.0023%6 Mar →
vertigo6–13-0.0315%6 Mar →
ancient13–160.0210%3 Mar →
vertigo13–80.0925%3 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0231%3 Mar →
vertigo14–16-0.0130%3 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0219%25 Feb →
vertigo12–16-0.0318%25 Feb →
inferno13–80.0717%25 Feb →
vertigo13–6-0.0114%25 Feb →
overpass14–160.0716%24 Feb →
overpass13–90.0417%24 Feb →
vertigo13–8-0.0115%24 Feb →
vertigo13–110.0315%24 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0111%17 Feb →
nuke13–80.0123%17 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.0318%17 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0211%17 Feb →
inferno10–130.0918%17 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0010%17 Feb →
vertigo13–70.0219%6 Feb →
overpass16–14-0.0316%2 Feb →
inferno13–70.0519%2 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0418%2 Feb →
inferno13–60.0526%2 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0222%27 Jan →
inferno16–120.0318%27 Jan →
overpass9–13-0.036%27 Jan →
vertigo10–13-0.0123%27 Jan →
overpass14–16-0.058%25 Jan →
vertigo13–80.0521%25 Jan →
nuke13–11-0.0211%24 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0217%17 Jan →
vertigo13–40.0910%17 Jan →
overpass9–13-0.0318%13 Jan →
nuke13–10-0.0111%13 Jan →
inferno13–16-0.0221%13 Jan →
vertigo11–13-0.0415%13 Jan →
nuke13–16-0.038%10 Jan →
inferno13–40.0813%10 Jan →
inferno13–20.0515%10 Jan →
vertigo10–130.018%10 Jan →
overpass13–90.0124%5 Jan →
vertigo13–20.065%5 Jan →
overpass11–13-0.0523%5 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0114%5 Jan →
vertigo13–8-0.0314%5 Jan →
inferno15–150.0528%3 Jan →
inferno13–80.000%30 Dec →
mirage10–13-0.0516%30 Dec →
overpass13–11-0.0032%30 Dec →
nuke6–130.0422%30 Dec →
nuke6–130.0324%30 Dec →
inferno8–13-0.0132%22 Dec →
ancient4–13-0.0717%22 Dec →
mirage5–13-0.0424%7 Dec →
inferno8–13-0.0414%7 Dec →
vertigo15–150.0219%7 Dec →
mirage13–11-0.0411%25 Nov →
mirage13–70.0723%18 Nov →
mirage15–15-0.0529%18 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.