LD

LD — CS2 Stats

HR76561198005652140[U:1:45386412]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,616Tracked matches58%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,538Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32906 of 220551 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,616 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 7 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,538 -1,508 7 Apr10 Sept · 32 days played
22,40625,561peak 25,5617 Apr10 Sept
25,965Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-04-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,023 below peak (25,561)
  • +8 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,462 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLDFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,538 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning63
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +100ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact7.6

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time589ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 8 May
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 1 May
375msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 28 Apr
13–3Biggest win · overpass, 7 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 13infernoWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B20101050%0.03
mirageB1910953%0.02
anubisB136746%0.02
ancientA138562%0.03
nukeB137654%-0.00
infernoD1321115%0.01
cacheA53260%0.03
overpass42250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

290Matches
47%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
85.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4760%1.1816.9
Anubis2065%1.3018.4
Ancient1850%1.2918.1
Dust21765%1.3518.6
Inferno1267%1.1417.7
Nuke667%0.9415.8
Vertigo333%1.2317.0
Cache10%1.0018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
588msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
9.90HE damage / grenade
5.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.661% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–160.0415%19 Jun
ancient13–70.0728%18 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0318%17 Jun
dust213–90.0434%17 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0118%17 Jun
dust26–13-0.0332%13 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0322%13 Jun
dust213–80.0530%12 Jun
dust29–130.0818%21 May
mirage10–130.0231%21 May
nuke13–10-0.0417%20 May
nuke7–13-0.0321%20 May
mirage5–13-0.0024%20 May
nuke2–13-0.0433%20 May
overpass13–90.0041%20 May
mirage15–150.0321%20 May
nuke11–130.009%19 May
nuke13–9-0.0322%19 May
dust215–150.0121%19 May
anubis14–160.0219%19 May
ancient13–11-0.0125%19 May
inferno13–8-0.0041%19 May
inferno15–150.0934%19 May
nuke13–90.0116%19 May
ancient13–80.0520%19 May
dust213–4-0.0231%19 May
anubis13–80.0626%18 May
ancient16–140.0123%18 May
anubis15–150.0217%18 May
dust216–13-0.0335%18 May
mirage13–70.0034%18 May
inferno7–130.0012%18 May
ancient6–13-0.0118%17 May
anubis13–80.1018%17 May
ancient13–110.0030%17 May
nuke13–40.0426%17 May
inferno6–130.0426%17 May
mirage14–16-0.0219%17 May
dust213–40.0522%16 May
ancient2–13-0.0443%16 May
dust216–14-0.0020%16 May
mirage5–13-0.0618%16 May
nuke10–13-0.0224%15 May
mirage9–13-0.0225%15 May
ancient5–13-0.0122%14 May
anubis9–130.0418%14 May
dust211–130.1035%14 May
anubis13–100.0712%11 May
mirage13–110.0415%11 May
dust213–80.1116%11 May
inferno13–50.0427%11 May
dust29–13-0.0420%10 May
ancient11–130.0429%10 May
ancient13–50.1724%8 May
inferno4–13-0.0328%8 May
mirage13–100.0021%7 May
nuke11–13-0.0320%7 May
cache8–130.1030%7 May
cache7–50.0219%6 May
mirage13–90.0632%6 May
mirage13–40.0820%6 May
ancient11–130.0831%5 May
inferno9–13-0.0019%4 May
mirage16–12-0.0218%4 May
mirage13–40.0829%4 May
overpass10–130.0115%3 May
dust214–160.0416%3 May
anubis13–11-0.0611%2 May
dust27–13-0.0127%2 May
dust25–13-0.0029%2 May
cache4–13-0.0447%1 May
cache13–6-0.0424%1 May
cache13–70.1128%30 Apr
anubis13–60.0413%28 Apr
inferno5–130.0142%28 Apr
overpass8–130.0132%23 Apr
inferno6–130.0413%23 Apr
ancient13–70.0133%23 Apr
mirage13–110.0418%22 Apr
inferno8–130.0017%22 Apr
dust213–50.1029%22 Apr
dust213–11-0.0222%21 Apr
inferno8–130.0632%21 Apr
nuke2–9-0.0825%18 Apr
inferno0–9-0.2144%18 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0119%11 Apr
dust211–13-0.0219%10 Apr
nuke13–90.1323%10 Apr
inferno8–130.0518%10 Apr
dust213–100.1026%9 Apr
nuke16–130.0338%9 Apr
mirage9–130.0439%9 Apr
mirage13–40.0619%8 Apr
anubis1–50.0131%8 Apr
anubis13–70.0138%8 Apr
dust25–130.0245%7 Apr
mirage15–150.0215%7 Apr
overpass13–30.0027%7 Apr
ancient16–130.0822%7 Apr
nuke9–10.0343%7 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →