BeBeKramz

BeBeKramz — CS2 Stats

DK76561198004345874[U:1:44080146]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,130Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,832 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,832 → 1,832
+2Tracked matches · now 1,130
0.0ppWin rate · 48.3% → 48.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 71 days played since 2 Jul 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,392 +458 2 Jul7 Apr · 5 days played
19,93420,940peak 20,9402 Jul7 Apr
Faceit ELO: 1,832 +0 8 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,8321,832peak 1,8328 Sept18 Sept
20,940Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,832Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
71Days played since 2025-07-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,832
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 169 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBeBeKramzFACEITLevel 8 · 1,832 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,832csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning57
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateWLWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · −65ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.7
Utility6.8
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time617ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 4 Jul
47%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · inferno, 19 Mar
422msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · nuke, 15 May
13–3Biggest win · vertigo, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
1014In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 15mirageWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB22111150%0.01
ancientA1810856%-0.00
nukeA159660%-0.02
mirageD102820%0.01
overpassC104640%0.01
dust2A74357%0.01
vertigoD62433%-0.01
anubisB63350%0.00
cacheD51420%-0.01
poseidon1010%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,413Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
73.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno13950%1.0615.5
Ancient13942%0.9013.8
Nuke11058%1.1215.7
Anubis9246%1.0315.2
Overpass5254%1.0313.9
Mirage4945%0.9913.7
Dust24040%0.8512.8
Vertigo3355%1.1015.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
616msReaction time
35.3%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
13.80HE damage / grenade
8.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.2608% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–30.0326%18 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.0410%9 Sept
inferno13–30.1219%9 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0319%9 Sept
vertigo14–160.0118%8 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0429%31 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0321%23 Aug
anubis13–80.0018%17 Aug
mirage7–130.1019%16 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0414%16 Aug
inferno13–90.0321%14 Aug
inferno12–120.0515%12 Aug
mirage1–130.0229%12 Aug
vertigo13–90.0419%10 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0421%10 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0413%8 Aug
cache5–130.0223%5 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0423%27 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0126%27 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0325%23 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0414%23 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0223%18 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0110%12 Jul
cache11–13-0.0018%9 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0611%9 Jul
ancient13–70.0514%7 Jul
inferno13–60.1320%4 Jul
cache13–100.0110%3 Jul
anubis20–220.0317%2 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0113%29 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0011%26 Jun
mirage10–130.0220%26 Jun
ancient28–250.0015%23 Jun
ancient16–190.0420%23 Jun
overpass16–140.0324%23 Jun
ancient13–70.0225%23 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0112%23 Jun
ancient16–130.0619%16 Jun
inferno10–130.0410%12 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0131%8 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0520%5 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0416%25 May
nuke13–11-0.0020%15 May
dust27–13-0.0317%15 May
anubis7–13-0.0023%26 Apr
cache13–16-0.0318%24 Apr
cache14–16-0.0418%24 Apr
inferno13–11-0.049%24 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0216%24 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0130%18 Apr
dust213–110.0121%16 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0224%10 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0323%8 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0316%7 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0619%7 Apr
dust25–13-0.0431%26 Mar
ancient13–100.0332%24 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0118%22 Mar
overpass13–8-0.0125%20 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0027%20 Mar
inferno10–130.0547%19 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0228%19 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0214%19 Mar
dust210–130.0516%14 Mar
mirage5–130.0622%13 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0616%13 Mar
inferno9–130.0015%12 Mar
ancient14–160.0624%11 Mar
inferno16–13-0.0414%9 Mar
dust213–110.0411%7 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0515%4 Mar
nuke9–13-0.083%4 Mar
nuke13–70.0111%26 Feb
overpass13–70.1219%21 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0328%20 Feb
anubis13–6-0.0418%16 Feb
poseidon1–9-0.137%13 Feb
anubis13–70.0115%11 Feb
nuke13–90.0022%9 Feb
nuke16–140.0015%3 Feb
anubis6–130.0026%22 Jan
inferno4–130.0118%22 Jan
nuke10–130.0026%15 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0512%18 Dec
nuke13–9-0.0123%7 Dec
overpass14–16-0.0012%5 Dec
mirage13–90.0332%4 Dec
inferno13–100.0526%31 Oct
overpass5–13-0.0313%29 Oct
nuke13–11-0.078%29 Oct
ancient13–80.0324%29 Oct
overpass5–13-0.0910%20 Oct
nuke13–90.0214%20 Oct
mirage14–160.0323%17 Oct
inferno9–13-0.0623%10 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0433%10 Sept
overpass13–30.1017%18 Aug
overpass7–130.0622%30 Jul
dust213–100.019%30 Jul
dust213–100.0331%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →