Funds Are Safu

Funds Are Safu — CS2 Stats

76561198000759368[U:1:40493640]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,445Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,306Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48850 of 240087 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+34Premier CS Rating · 22,272 → 22,306
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,306 +70 22 Aug23 Sept · 29 days played
19,44722,633peak 22,63322 Aug23 Sept
23,217Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 327 below peak (22,633)
  • +1,115 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,694 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFunds Are SafuFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,306 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning72
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateTLWWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility3.7
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning7.2
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time540ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 11 Sept
56%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · inferno, 5 Sept
398msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · mirage, 28 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 20 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 23ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2882029%-0.01
dust2A2314961%0.01
infernoA148657%-0.01
cacheA127558%0.00
ancientD113827%0.02
nukeA74357%0.01
anubisA53260%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

96Matches
53%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
87.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22264%1.2218.0
Mirage2148%1.2518.3
Inferno1547%1.2517.4
Anubis1050%1.1918.1
Ancient1070%1.0715.8
Nuke667%0.9919.2
Cache450%0.9916.0
Train30%0.8915.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.4%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
536msReaction time
60.5%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
6.05HE damage / grenade
3.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.0622 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–150.0216%23 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0811%23 Sept
inferno16–130.0220%23 Sept
ancient13–80.0315%22 Sept
ancient9–130.0427%22 Sept
mirage5–130.0616%21 Sept
dust213–100.0321%20 Sept
dust213–10.1328%20 Sept
anubis11–130.0423%19 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0120%19 Sept
inferno9–130.0324%18 Sept
dust213–100.0329%18 Sept
nuke8–130.0127%18 Sept
cache16–120.0116%17 Sept
anubis13–90.0716%17 Sept
cache15–150.0020%16 Sept
mirage3–130.0121%16 Sept
cache11–13-0.0320%16 Sept
dust213–30.0733%16 Sept
dust211–130.0417%16 Sept
cache15–150.0510%14 Sept
inferno3–13-0.069%14 Sept
dust213–11-0.0420%14 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0119%12 Sept
dust213–50.0533%12 Sept
mirage16–120.0229%12 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0120%12 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0217%12 Sept
dust25–130.0437%12 Sept
mirage8–130.0423%12 Sept
dust213–7-0.0315%12 Sept
mirage10–130.0113%12 Sept
nuke13–50.1428%11 Sept
dust211–130.0029%11 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0015%10 Sept
ancient12–160.049%10 Sept
cache13–80.0732%10 Sept
dust210–13-0.0215%10 Sept
inferno13–80.0518%10 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0619%9 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0413%9 Sept
mirage7–130.0218%9 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0719%8 Sept
anubis16–120.0420%7 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0328%7 Sept
mirage13–100.0316%7 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0610%7 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0310%7 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0415%7 Sept
mirage13–30.0518%6 Sept
dust210–13-0.0324%6 Sept
dust213–9-0.0413%6 Sept
cache13–8-0.0913%5 Sept
inferno9–60.0456%5 Sept
mirage9–130.019%5 Sept
dust216–14-0.0118%5 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0220%5 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0220%5 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0221%5 Sept
dust28–13-0.0526%5 Sept
ancient11–130.0523%4 Sept
dust28–13-0.0423%4 Sept
cache13–80.0421%4 Sept
dust213–7-0.0411%4 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0317%2 Sept
nuke13–40.0720%2 Sept
cache13–40.0817%2 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0522%31 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0917%31 Aug
ancient16–130.0625%30 Aug
mirage3–13-0.083%30 Aug
inferno13–90.0018%30 Aug
mirage12–160.0121%29 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0544%29 Aug
mirage13–70.1122%29 Aug
dust213–90.0419%29 Aug
dust213–50.0620%29 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0614%29 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0417%29 Aug
dust213–11-0.0311%28 Aug
dust213–30.0219%28 Aug
mirage13–70.0820%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0533%28 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0621%27 Aug
cache13–10-0.0525%27 Aug
cache13–6-0.0719%26 Aug
ancient13–80.0329%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0321%25 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0112%25 Aug
ancient10–130.0620%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0730%24 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0119%23 Aug
cache7–13-0.0122%23 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0516%23 Aug
ancient11–130.0222%23 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0221%22 Aug
cache10–130.0225%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0336%22 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0332%22 Aug
dust24–130.0125%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →