27cmSwing(nIKLAK)

27cmSwing(nIKLAK) — CS2 Stats

76561198000053358[U:1:39787630]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,818Tracked matches30%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,959 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,959 → 1,959
+45Tracked matches · now 4,818
−23.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 30.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 23 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,959 +0 30 Aug13 Sept · 5 observations
1,9591,959peak 1,95930 Aug13 Sept
1,959Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,959
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 42 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG27cmSwing(nIKLAK)FACEITLevel 9 · 1,959 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,959csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning64
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4654Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −68ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.8

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 65% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time506ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 517ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms
Headshot accuracy12.2%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 11–13 · mirage, 16 Sept
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · cache, 30 Aug
383msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · vertigo, 15 Sept
13–4Biggest win · ancient, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2081240%0.01
mirageB2091145%0.02
infernoS128467%0.02
vertigoB115645%0.04
cacheA95456%0.01
nukeC94544%0.01
anubisD82625%0.01
ancientB63350%-0.02
train41325%-0.04
overpass110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,559Matches
49%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
83.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage36546%1.0415.8
Dust229344%1.0215.6
Inferno25754%1.1216.5
Ancient19748%1.1616.8
Nuke12755%1.1716.4
Anubis10253%1.0716.1
Overpass7853%1.0816.7
Train6159%1.1515.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.2%Headshot accuracy
41.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
75.1%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
503msReaction time
65.3%T opening success
40.2%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
7.60HE damage / grenade
6.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.1682% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.0211%17 Sept
anubis3–130.054%17 Sept
dust211–130.0212%16 Sept
cache9–13-0.0216%16 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0011%16 Sept
ancient5–130.047%16 Sept
mirage11–130.228%16 Sept
dust29–130.0613%15 Sept
vertigo6–13-0.0412%15 Sept
inferno13–90.048%15 Sept
nuke13–50.108%15 Sept
vertigo13–60.0116%15 Sept
vertigo13–80.0718%15 Sept
dust210–130.0321%15 Sept
nuke8–13-0.047%15 Sept
ancient2–13-0.069%15 Sept
dust213–80.0214%15 Sept
inferno10–130.0217%14 Sept
anubis8–130.0414%14 Sept
vertigo8–130.0016%14 Sept
train13–7-0.0613%11 Sept
cache13–9-0.0617%10 Sept
ancient13–100.005%10 Sept
cache7–130.0116%10 Sept
vertigo10–13-0.008%10 Sept
nuke7–13-0.027%10 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0413%10 Sept
dust27–130.0419%9 Sept
mirage9–130.0210%9 Sept
dust25–13-0.0113%9 Sept
mirage11–130.0215%9 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0511%9 Sept
inferno13–110.0114%9 Sept
dust213–50.0318%9 Sept
cache13–11-0.006%8 Sept
mirage13–110.0615%8 Sept
mirage13–100.035%8 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0613%8 Sept
inferno13–60.0315%8 Sept
anubis4–13-0.088%7 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0110%7 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0318%7 Sept
inferno16–140.0412%7 Sept
dust213–50.0211%5 Sept
vertigo13–80.1513%5 Sept
nuke10–130.0611%5 Sept
dust25–130.0520%5 Sept
anubis13–160.017%4 Sept
dust213–40.0611%4 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0313%4 Sept
mirage13–110.0212%3 Sept
nuke16–120.0419%3 Sept
cache10–130.0418%3 Sept
inferno13–50.0320%3 Sept
mirage4–130.008%2 Sept
train5–13-0.078%2 Sept
mirage9–130.0117%2 Sept
dust213–110.0729%2 Sept
cache13–50.088%2 Sept
vertigo13–60.1112%30 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0412%30 Aug
dust213–60.0413%30 Aug
cache13–110.0431%30 Aug
dust217–190.0317%30 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0216%30 Aug
inferno13–70.028%29 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0014%29 Aug
nuke3–130.0014%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0226%28 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0020%28 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0419%28 Aug
vertigo13–40.1828%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0019%28 Aug
mirage13–70.0315%28 Aug
mirage13–60.064%28 Aug
inferno13–110.0816%28 Aug
overpass13–80.1122%28 Aug
dust23–13-0.085%28 Aug
nuke13–100.0213%28 Aug
dust29–13-0.0312%28 Aug
train4–13-0.0326%28 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0316%26 Aug
cache13–9-0.0021%25 Aug
dust214–160.0017%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.067%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0619%25 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0022%25 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0023%25 Aug
dust213–11-0.0119%25 Aug
anubis13–100.0512%25 Aug
anubis13–40.0612%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0211%24 Aug
cache14–160.029%24 Aug
train9–13-0.025%24 Aug
dust213–40.0019%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0118%24 Aug
mirage13–110.058%24 Aug
mirage13–90.0427%24 Aug
mirage6–130.0012%24 Aug
vertigo1–13-0.0210%23 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →