Jamers

Jamers — CS2 Stats

GB76561197996175949[U:1:35910221]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,273Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating23,826Top 25% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31864 of 240917 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 19 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,826 +5,052 19 Jul6 Sept · 35 days played
17,85824,874peak 24,87419 Jul6 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,753 +0 28 Aug1 Sept · 3 observations
1,7531,753peak 1,75328 Aug1 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,753Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,048 below peak (24,874)
  • +4,817 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,174 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJamersFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,826 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,753csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning40
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52435Last 10052%Win rateLLLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.7
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact0.2

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time570ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 4–3 · cache, 22 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–3 · cache, 22 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · inferno, 25 Aug
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 21 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L7Current streak
136In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB34171750%-0.00
cacheA1911858%0.01
ancientC1881044%0.00
anubisA95456%-0.01
mirageA74357%0.03
nukeS65183%0.01
overpass21150%-0.01
office21150%-0.04
dust22020%-0.01
train1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

752Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
74.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Overpass250%1.0419.5
Inferno2100%1.0615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
70.9%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
576msReaction time
21.4%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
7.72HE damage / grenade
7.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.3918% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.087%6 Sept
inferno1–13-0.0435%3 Sept
cache5–130.0540%2 Sept
inferno10–130.0430%2 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0120%1 Sept
cache9–130.0224%31 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0730%31 Aug
cache13–10-0.0416%31 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0125%29 Aug
overpass13–3-0.0327%29 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0717%29 Aug
mirage13–40.0519%29 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0410%29 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0224%29 Aug
cache6–13-0.0033%29 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0412%29 Aug
anubis7–1-0.0333%29 Aug
overpass4–130.0128%28 Aug
cache6–130.0020%28 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0528%28 Aug
office4–13-0.0517%27 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0428%27 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0215%25 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0316%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0125%25 Aug
train5–13-0.0419%25 Aug
cache1–30.0120%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0327%24 Aug
office13–9-0.0315%24 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0523%24 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0730%23 Aug
nuke13–70.0328%23 Aug
cache13–11-0.0020%23 Aug
inferno13–80.0725%23 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0530%22 Aug
cache4–30.1350%22 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0314%22 Aug
inferno13–60.0326%21 Aug
ancient7–130.0018%21 Aug
inferno13–20.0837%21 Aug
cache13–70.0630%20 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0025%20 Aug
cache13–70.0117%20 Aug
anubis13–3-0.1013%19 Aug
inferno13–90.0417%19 Aug
cache15–150.0222%18 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0125%18 Aug
inferno13–100.0143%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0523%16 Aug
anubis13–110.0025%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0723%11 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0616%11 Aug
ancient13–100.0116%11 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0218%9 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0127%9 Aug
inferno13–100.0225%9 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0147%8 Aug
nuke13–80.0829%6 Aug
inferno6–10.0831%6 Aug
ancient13–60.0720%3 Aug
cache10–13-0.0020%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.049%2 Aug
mirage13–30.1213%2 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0520%2 Aug
anubis13–110.0413%2 Aug
dust29–130.0230%1 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0624%1 Aug
cache13–60.0220%31 Jul
anubis13–60.0832%31 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0114%31 Jul
inferno16–130.0422%30 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0212%30 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0019%30 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0216%29 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0223%29 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0133%29 Jul
ancient13–100.1023%29 Jul
cache13–10-0.0311%28 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0130%28 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0322%28 Jul
ancient13–110.0124%27 Jul
cache13–110.019%27 Jul
mirage8–130.0525%27 Jul
ancient9–130.0823%27 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0124%27 Jul
nuke13–100.0218%25 Jul
inferno13–70.0211%25 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0011%24 Jul
ancient15–150.0124%24 Jul
cache13–100.0521%24 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0020%23 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0327%23 Jul
inferno13–100.0117%21 Jul
inferno13–20.0430%21 Jul
inferno14–160.0123%21 Jul
inferno9–130.0323%20 Jul
cache10–130.0233%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0637%20 Jul
ancient8–130.0120%19 Jul
inferno13–60.0135%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →