vits

vits — CS2 Stats

MX76561197995498882[U:1:35233154]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

393Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating12,627Blue band · top ~41% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 997 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 393 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 23 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,627 -328 25 Feb19 Sept · 4 days played
12,62713,313peak 13,31325 Feb19 Sept
13,422Peak Premier in tracked matches
997Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2025-12-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 997
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 54 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 686 below peak (13,313)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,373 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvitsFACEITLevel 4 · 997 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,627 · Blue bandPEAK ELO997csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning45
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46477Last 10046%Win rateLLWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −77ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim3.2
Utility4.8
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 66% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning4.5
Utility4.8
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time649ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 24 Apr
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · office, 19 Mar
352msFastest reaction time · 0–8 · dust2, 11 May
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 25 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 50infernoWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B50252550%-0.02
infernoC1761135%-0.02
nukeC114736%0.00
trainC52340%0.01
office43175%-0.04
ancient43175%-0.01
mirage31233%-0.02
anubis2020%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.03
cache110100%0.02
alpine110100%-0.01
rooftop1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

28Matches
46%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
69.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage450%0.7912.3
Dust2333%0.8512.0
Ancient20%0.8615.0
Inferno250%0.8016.0
Anubis1100%0.7911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
28.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.7%Spray accuracy
66.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
666msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
37.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
7.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.0215% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0613%18 Sept
nuke3–60.000%9 Sept
dust213–10-0.0117%18 Jun
overpass10–13-0.037%15 Jun
dust26–130.0818%9 Jun
dust213–110.0317%9 Jun
office3–13-0.0517%15 May
nuke6–13-0.0519%15 May
office13–11-0.0115%15 May
mirage7–13-0.0313%13 May
dust25–50.0222%13 May
nuke13–40.0311%13 May
dust20–8-0.0419%11 May
dust27–60.0012%11 May
dust213–60.0317%11 May
train13–50.0326%7 May
dust213–70.0316%4 May
dust21–13-0.055%3 May
dust213–70.0324%3 May
dust29–13-0.0521%2 May
mirage13–10-0.0515%2 May
cache13–80.0239%2 May
dust213–7-0.0323%1 May
nuke12–12-0.0315%1 May
nuke13–80.0119%25 Apr
office13–10-0.0217%24 Apr
inferno9–20.2721%24 Apr
inferno5–9-0.1017%24 Apr
train13–60.0932%22 Apr
train2–13-0.0316%22 Apr
train11–13-0.0328%22 Apr
dust23–13-0.0812%21 Apr
dust25–130.015%1 Apr
dust213–7-0.0321%1 Apr
dust212–12-0.0416%30 Mar
dust211–13-0.0412%30 Mar
dust211–13-0.0616%30 Mar
dust211–13-0.0116%28 Mar
dust25–13-0.0917%26 Mar
dust213–11-0.0319%26 Mar
dust213–90.012%23 Mar
alpine13–5-0.0111%22 Mar
inferno6–13-0.1010%22 Mar
dust212–12-0.0526%22 Mar
office13–8-0.0840%19 Mar
dust213–7-0.0814%19 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0214%19 Mar
dust210–13-0.0415%12 Mar
dust213–10-0.0125%12 Mar
dust211–13-0.0819%10 Mar
nuke9–130.0018%1 Mar
dust213–8-0.006%1 Mar
dust213–90.0927%26 Feb
dust213–7-0.0616%26 Feb
inferno13–2-0.093%25 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0512%25 Feb
ancient13–1-0.017%25 Feb
mirage15–150.0214%25 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0528%24 Feb
dust28–13-0.0511%24 Feb
dust213–100.0220%24 Feb
dust213–5-0.0211%23 Feb
inferno9–60.0826%21 Feb
dust213–60.0616%21 Feb
nuke8–1-0.048%21 Feb
dust212–12-0.0116%21 Feb
inferno13–3-0.0218%18 Feb
dust24–13-0.0622%18 Feb
nuke13–30.1535%17 Feb
dust213–80.0011%16 Feb
anubis4–13-0.028%9 Feb
dust213–11-0.0519%9 Feb
ancient16–14-0.0419%5 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0115%5 Feb
dust26–13-0.0324%2 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0411%31 Jan
dust27–130.0017%30 Jan
inferno5–90.0322%30 Jan
nuke7–90.0524%30 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0815%29 Jan
inferno2–13-0.0625%27 Jan
ancient10–130.0313%26 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0422%26 Jan
anubis11–130.0012%26 Jan
dust213–90.0324%26 Jan
dust211–13-0.0418%24 Jan
dust213–80.0824%24 Jan
dust26–13-0.0211%14 Jan
dust213–80.0114%12 Jan
dust29–7-0.0212%12 Jan
dust210–13-0.0521%11 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0515%9 Jan
train4–13-0.0213%7 Jan
nuke12–12-0.0412%7 Jan
dust28–13-0.0121%29 Dec
dust24–13-0.0829%29 Dec
rooftop8–80.018%27 Dec
inferno5–9-0.0419%27 Dec
inferno12–16-0.0213%23 Dec
ancient16–14-0.0019%23 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →