Nobody — CS2 Stats

76561197995497040[U:1:35231312]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,140Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating12,033Blue band · top ~44.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11763 of 16576 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,071 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41

Positioning36

Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateWWLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim4.1

Aggression2.5

Utility7.1

Positioning3.6

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch6.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 664ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1

Positioning3.6

Utility7.1

Mechanics5.0

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time675ms−30ms

first ⅓ avg 704ms → last ⅓ avg 675ms

Headshot accuracy12.9%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — inferno 9–4

13–2Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 21ancientWeakest map · 35% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	21	12–9	57%	-0.01
inferno	B	17	8–9	47%	0.00
ancient	C	17	6–11	35%	-0.02
dust2	C	17	7–10	41%	-0.01
cache	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.02
anubis	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.01
mirage	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches

51%Win rate

0.66Avg K/D

67.8ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	7	43%	0.74	12.6
Ancient	6	33%	0.70	11.2
Anubis	5	20%	0.58	10.6
Vertigo	4	75%	0.63	10.5
Nuke	2	100%	0.86	16.0
Mirage	2	50%	0.47	11.5
Dust2	1	0%	0.71	24.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy

34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

29.7%Spray accuracy

72.5%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

664msReaction time

26.3%T opening success

28.1%CT opening success

0.74Enemies flashed / flash

3.2%Flash assists

13.19HE damage / grenade

11.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.4643% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.3415% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–9	-0.05	13%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.05	13%	27 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.09	23%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.00	10%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.07	14%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	27%	25 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	13%	25 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.02	8%	25 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.05	11%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	5%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.00	20%	22 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	8%	22 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.02	13%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–2	-0.03	7%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	21%	21 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	22%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	6%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	5%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	8%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	14%	17 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.04	10%	16 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	18%	16 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	8%	16 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	10%	16 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	9%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.00	12%	16 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	12%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.00	8%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	14%	15 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	15%	15 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	9%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	20%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	10%	15 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.00	2%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	2%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	9%	14 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.10	21%	14 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.07	9%	14 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	19%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	25%	11 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	17%	10 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	18%	10 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	9%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.06	9%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.04	7%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	8%	8 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	10%	8 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.03	7%	8 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	17%	8 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	15%	8 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	13%	8 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	14%	7 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	9%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	20%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	10%	3 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	10%	3 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.13	12%	3 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	9%	31 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	22%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	10%	31 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	12%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	20%	31 Jul →
inferno	9–4	0.26	5%	30 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	9%	30 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.02	21%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.01	8%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.02	15%	26 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	10%	25 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.06	13%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.04	7%	25 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	12%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	10%	25 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.06	12%	24 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	4%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	14%	23 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	11%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	7%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	22%	22 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	15%	22 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	20%	22 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.02	14%	22 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	4%	21 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	12%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.05	18%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.02	15%	19 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	9%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	3%	19 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	15%	19 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	26%	19 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	26%	19 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.03	9%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	12%	19 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.06	7%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.05	15%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	8%	18 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.03	24%	18 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	23%	18 Jul →