radicaL3i †

radicaL3i † — CS2 Stats

76561197991578584[U:1:31312856]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

442Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,632Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,024 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 442 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 28 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,632 -872 3 May1 Sept · 5 days played
16,71118,504peak 18,5043 May1 Sept
18,504Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,024Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2025-11-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,024
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 476 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 872 below peak (18,504)
  • +921 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,368 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGradicaL3i †FACEITLevel 9 · 2,024 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER17,632 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,024csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning64
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateWWWTWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.5
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.4
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time589ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy28.3%+5.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 28.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 15 May
58%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 11 May
406msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 10 Dec
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 2 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2191243%0.02
ancientB20101050%0.01
mirageD1861233%0.02
anubisD103730%0.02
overpassS96367%0.02
trainA85363%0.02
cacheC73443%0.06
nukeA53260%0.03
inferno21150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

438Matches
56%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
88.4ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6357%1.3518.5
Mirage5147%1.1717.4
Dust24048%1.2816.8
Overpass3762%1.3517.5
Train2864%1.2518.6
Nuke2552%1.1516.5
Anubis1443%1.1418.4
Inferno1242%1.1917.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.8%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
587msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
55.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
7.43HE damage / grenade
16.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.1927% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–20.0818%4 Jul
cache13–20.0923%4 Jul
ancient13–110.0115%3 Jul
anubis15–150.0129%3 Jul
mirage13–60.0923%14 Jun
mirage8–130.0119%11 Jun
dust27–130.0843%11 Jun
dust210–130.1031%9 Jun
mirage8–130.0825%9 Jun
cache9–130.0728%17 May
anubis11–130.0121%17 May
overpass13–80.0324%17 May
anubis11–130.0420%15 May
cache10–130.0524%15 May
dust213–80.1733%15 May
inferno9–13-0.0833%14 May
mirage13–50.1030%14 May
mirage9–13-0.0323%11 May
cache6–130.0358%11 May
cache6–130.1030%10 May
ancient13–100.0924%10 May
inferno13–70.0730%10 May
overpass13–40.1220%9 May
mirage13–60.0850%3 May
anubis11–130.0740%3 May
nuke13–100.0113%3 May
mirage13–10.0924%2 May
dust28–130.0132%2 May
ancient8–13-0.0119%2 May
dust213–100.0637%30 Apr
dust213–20.0933%30 Apr
cache13–10.0140%30 Apr
dust210–13-0.0324%28 Apr
nuke13–60.0542%28 Apr
ancient8–130.0419%28 Apr
dust213–7-0.0233%27 Apr
overpass13–20.0637%26 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0529%21 Apr
anubis16–130.0121%19 Apr
dust21–13-0.0533%19 Apr
ancient0–3-0.040%18 Apr
mirage5–130.0833%18 Apr
mirage6–130.0330%12 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0029%20 Feb
anubis14–160.0313%2 Feb
mirage5–130.0027%21 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0015%20 Jan
anubis13–80.0321%20 Jan
dust24–13-0.0717%16 Jan
anubis13–70.0028%16 Jan
anubis12–160.0221%14 Jan
dust213–110.0246%12 Jan
anubis10–130.0323%12 Jan
train13–40.0338%5 Jan
dust25–130.0925%5 Jan
ancient15–15-0.0122%2 Jan
nuke9–130.0129%2 Jan
overpass9–130.0122%18 Dec
train13–70.0335%18 Dec
dust211–13-0.0220%17 Dec
mirage9–130.0222%17 Dec
dust213–110.0621%17 Dec
train12–160.0117%17 Dec
ancient13–70.0022%17 Dec
mirage8–130.0133%16 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0021%16 Dec
dust210–13-0.0523%16 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0322%15 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0032%15 Dec
overpass13–8-0.0215%15 Dec
ancient16–12-0.0220%15 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0125%15 Dec
ancient19–160.0222%11 Dec
nuke13–70.0633%11 Dec
dust213–90.0029%10 Dec
ancient13–60.0523%9 Dec
ancient13–50.1114%8 Dec
train16–140.0529%8 Dec
train9–130.0217%7 Dec
dust29–13-0.0310%7 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0611%7 Dec
ancient6–13-0.037%7 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0618%5 Dec
ancient13–100.0217%5 Dec
dust24–13-0.0523%5 Dec
mirage13–60.0515%5 Dec
overpass8–130.0629%4 Dec
ancient13–100.0529%3 Dec
overpass9–13-0.0224%3 Dec
overpass13–110.0130%2 Dec
train13–20.0136%2 Dec
dust213–8-0.0120%2 Dec
ancient13–110.0114%2 Dec
train13–10-0.0131%30 Nov
mirage14–16-0.0125%30 Nov
dust210–130.0125%30 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0228%30 Nov
mirage5–13-0.0825%29 Nov
train14–160.0625%29 Nov
dust213–90.0821%28 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →