KASPER :]

KASPER :] — CS2 Stats

DK76561197990737748[U:1:30472020]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,033Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,597 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,033 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 3 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,597 +0 29 Aug1 Sept · 2 observations
2,5972,597peak 2,59729 Aug1 Sept
2,597Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-02-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,597
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 403 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKASPER :]FACEITLevel 10 · 2,597 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,597csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning58
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57403Last 10057%Win rateLLLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.8
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time574ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 22 Feb
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 20 Mar
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 8 Feb
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 12 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2718967%0.02
nukeB24121250%0.00
ancientC167944%-0.01
overpassA117464%0.01
dust2S107370%-0.01
anubisS64267%0.03
mirage41325%0.02
vertigo1010%0.08
train110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,414Matches
50%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
76.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke5260%1.1015.7
Inferno4850%1.1415.8
Ancient4149%0.9815.2
Overpass3754%1.1516.5
Dust21547%1.0415.7
Anubis1450%1.1617.0
Train650%1.1018.5
Cache1100%0.8113.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
581msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
7.28HE damage / grenade
10.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4696 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3138% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0811%5 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0215%5 Jun
dust27–13-0.0127%5 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0318%5 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0219%13 May
nuke13–90.0116%13 May
dust210–13-0.0423%13 May
inferno13–100.039%7 May
nuke13–30.0522%7 May
ancient5–13-0.0313%7 May
inferno13–100.1227%23 Mar
inferno13–40.0821%23 Mar
overpass13–50.0118%23 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0522%22 Mar
ancient13–6-0.069%22 Mar
nuke5–130.0118%22 Mar
ancient13–5-0.0011%22 Mar
inferno13–60.0343%20 Mar
dust213–4-0.0023%20 Mar
ancient4–13-0.100%20 Mar
dust213–7-0.0226%19 Mar
nuke13–90.0221%19 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0318%18 Mar
anubis13–40.1423%18 Mar
nuke12–120.0225%18 Mar
dust213–60.0328%18 Mar
inferno13–40.024%18 Mar
ancient3–130.0523%18 Mar
mirage13–80.1030%18 Mar
nuke13–70.0124%17 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0113%17 Mar
nuke17–19-0.0217%17 Mar
ancient6–130.0127%17 Mar
nuke6–130.0413%16 Mar
nuke2–13-0.1114%16 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0325%16 Mar
inferno9–130.0015%14 Mar
ancient9–130.0315%12 Mar
nuke6–130.0116%12 Mar
inferno4–13-0.056%12 Mar
inferno11–130.0217%12 Mar
overpass13–20.1315%12 Mar
nuke12–120.0234%12 Mar
overpass13–8-0.0022%11 Mar
overpass9–130.0717%11 Mar
nuke16–130.0118%11 Mar
nuke13–90.0310%11 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0113%11 Mar
overpass13–50.0112%11 Mar
nuke1–13-0.0110%10 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0324%10 Mar
anubis13–40.0217%9 Mar
inferno6–10.1120%9 Mar
dust213–50.0723%6 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0417%4 Mar
nuke13–60.0315%4 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0726%4 Mar
inferno2–130.0114%4 Mar
inferno13–110.0119%25 Feb
overpass14–16-0.0125%25 Feb
inferno13–110.0124%25 Feb
inferno13–90.0915%24 Feb
ancient25–22-0.0228%24 Feb
inferno13–90.0339%24 Feb
ancient13–110.0614%24 Feb
vertigo12–120.0824%24 Feb
train13–2-0.0415%24 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0115%24 Feb
ancient13–90.0217%23 Feb
dust213–6-0.0122%23 Feb
nuke13–40.0521%22 Feb
inferno13–40.1417%22 Feb
overpass13–90.0220%22 Feb
dust225–22-0.0119%22 Feb
nuke11–130.0217%22 Feb
inferno11–130.0131%15 Feb
nuke13–3-0.0121%15 Feb
dust216–140.0013%15 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0214%15 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0420%11 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0016%11 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0629%9 Feb
inferno13–20.0516%9 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0622%9 Feb
nuke13–30.0216%9 Feb
anubis1–13-0.0524%9 Feb
inferno16–130.0225%8 Feb
inferno13–80.0519%8 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0513%8 Feb
inferno13–30.0621%5 Feb
mirage11–130.0326%5 Feb
anubis2–13-0.0611%5 Feb
ancient6–13-0.069%5 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0111%4 Feb
anubis13–90.1011%4 Feb
ancient13–110.0116%4 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0611%3 Feb
anubis13–100.0326%3 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0114%3 Feb
ancient13–50.0115%3 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →