jones

jones — CS2 Stats

NO76561197989478838[U:1:29213110]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

997Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,580 → 1,580
+3Tracked matches · now 997
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,293 +669 14 Mar – 23 Jun · 22 days played
18,78221,672peak 21,67214 Mar23 Jun
21,994Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,580Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-01-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,580
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 171 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjonesPEAK ELO1,580csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning42
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility5.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 652ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning4.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time657ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 22 May →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 10 Jun →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 16 May →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14overpassWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2011–955%-0.02
ancientA149–564%-0.03
mirageB147–750%-0.03
infernoB147–750%-0.02
anubisA138–562%0.01
nukeC125–742%-0.03
overpassD93–633%-0.01
cache—21–150%-0.00
vertigo—21–150%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,329Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
72.7ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10945%0.8313.3
Anubis9358%0.9214.5
Inferno8157%0.9614.2
Ancient7846%0.8514.0
Nuke6857%0.8413.4
Dust26151%0.9815.6
Overpass2854%0.8715.0
Vertigo1450%0.7611.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
65.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
652msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
10.61HE damage / grenade
7.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1886% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0133%27 Sept →
nuke13–00.0412%18 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0727%18 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0017%12 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0616%9 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0029%17 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0432%17 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0619%6 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0919%6 Aug →
cache13–50.0121%6 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.097%15 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0235%11 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0516%11 Jul →
dust23–13-0.1015%9 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0311%23 Jun →
overpass8–130.0218%23 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0928%20 Jun →
dust213–40.0119%20 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.028%19 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0318%16 Jun →
nuke16–14-0.0228%16 Jun →
inferno13–90.0423%15 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0535%14 Jun →
inferno13–50.0426%14 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0614%13 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0141%13 Jun →
dust213–50.0446%10 Jun →
anubis13–90.0822%9 Jun →
ancient13–5-0.0415%9 Jun →
dust213–40.0434%9 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0422%5 Jun →
dust212–16-0.0319%30 May →
inferno13–70.0129%29 May →
dust213–80.0328%28 May →
nuke13–70.0212%28 May →
inferno13–6-0.0124%24 May →
ancient13–60.1221%22 May →
overpass8–13-0.0823%16 May →
inferno9–130.0018%16 May →
mirage13–3-0.0328%16 May →
nuke13–7-0.0517%16 May →
ancient13–11-0.0717%16 May →
cache17–19-0.0215%12 May →
overpass16–14-0.0226%5 May →
mirage10–130.0423%2 May →
nuke3–13-0.0413%2 May →
dust213–7-0.0910%25 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0515%25 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.1030%25 Apr →
anubis13–60.0418%25 Apr →
mirage13–3-0.0330%25 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0223%23 Apr →
ancient2–13-0.117%23 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0428%22 Apr →
mirage13–50.0034%20 Apr →
anubis13–100.0339%17 Apr →
ancient13–70.0128%17 Apr →
anubis13–40.0529%17 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0111%15 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0521%14 Apr →
overpass5–13-0.0238%14 Apr →
overpass6–130.0515%13 Apr →
ancient13–16-0.0612%13 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0126%12 Apr →
anubis13–60.0339%12 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0231%9 Apr →
vertigo13–9-0.0633%9 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0615%9 Apr →
mirage12–16-0.0325%9 Apr →
ancient22–20-0.0018%8 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0224%7 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0921%2 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.0820%2 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0313%2 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0028%2 Apr →
mirage16–13-0.0316%2 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0618%26 Mar →
mirage13–100.0036%26 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0420%26 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0431%22 Mar →
vertigo11–13-0.0816%21 Mar →
overpass13–7-0.0231%21 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0323%21 Mar →
inferno14–16-0.0223%19 Mar →
mirage13–50.0217%19 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.0520%14 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.0222%14 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.059%14 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0714%14 Mar →
dust213–6-0.0333%14 Mar →
dust216–140.0829%10 Mar →
overpass13–110.0230%23 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0016%12 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0423%9 Feb →
anubis13–9-0.0221%9 Feb →
ancient13–60.0120%5 Feb →
dust213–90.0332%5 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0738%5 Feb →
inferno13–40.0732%27 Jan →
anubis13–30.0624%27 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.