Panzerplay — CS2 Stats

76561197988852775[U:1:28587047]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

792Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,312Pink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10824 of 27403 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning57

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateLWLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1

Aggression6.1

Utility6.5

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.7

Utility6.5

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time573ms−69ms

first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms

Headshot accuracy17.6%−3.6%

first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 13–4

13–1Biggest win — overpass

4Longest win streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 21dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	23	11–12	48%	0.02
cache	B	22	10–12	45%	0.03
nuke	A	21	12–9	57%	0.02
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
dust2	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.00
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02
mirage	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	0.06
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.14
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

403Matches

52%Win rate

1.23Avg K/D

84.6ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	7	43%	1.06	13.4
Ancient	7	43%	1.02	18.1
Mirage	5	40%	1.24	16.0
Anubis	5	40%	1.02	17.2
Vertigo	4	100%	2.18	19.3
Overpass	3	67%	1.59	25.3
Dust2	3	33%	1.08	17.7
Cache	1	100%	1.64	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy

40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.8%Spray accuracy

76.5%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

568msReaction time

29.4%T opening success

47.1%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

8.3%Flash assists

11.82HE damage / grenade

9.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.4275% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	4–13	-0.03	23%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.08	10%	25 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	9%	23 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.01	13%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.05	16%	23 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.02	7%	21 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	13%	21 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.01	16%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.04	14%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	22%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	19%	19 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	16%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	10%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.08	15%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.01	15%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	25%	16 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	14%	16 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	26%	16 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	30%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.02	18%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.11	25%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.05	23%	15 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.04	9%	15 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.10	28%	15 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.09	17%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.06	19%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	23%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.04	16%	11 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.05	23%	11 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.05	18%	11 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	12%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	9%	11 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	28%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	11%	29 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	18%	29 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	17%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.07	21%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.09	16%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.10	25%	25 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	14%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	19%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.19	25%	25 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	30%	25 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	16%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	20%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.09	17%	25 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.07	21%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	20%	25 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.03	14%	25 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.09	8%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	21%	24 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.05	22%	24 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.07	17%	24 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.05	15%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.01	20%	24 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.00	19%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	19%	24 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.07	25%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.04	20%	23 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	15%	23 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	29%	22 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	23%	22 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.09	20%	22 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	22%	21 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.03	10%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.06	15%	21 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	12%	21 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.07	27%	21 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.09	20%	20 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.06	22%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.07	6%	20 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	17%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	8%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	15%	20 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.03	26%	20 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.01	8%	19 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.05	22%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	27%	15 Jul →
fachwerk	5–13	0.05	12%	15 Jul →
shelter	13–8	0.10	18%	15 Jul →
shelter	3–13	0.02	20%	15 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	16%	15 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.00	24%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.03	26%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.04	31%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	20%	14 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.03	20%	14 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.02	31%	14 Jul →
overpass	13–6	0.16	19%	8 Jul →
office	12–12	0.05	32%	8 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.03	10%	8 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.09	25%	7 Jul →
overpass	13–1	0.12	32%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.03	13%	5 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.04	24%	5 Jul →
nuke	10–0	0.13	19%	5 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.01	34%	5 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	35%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.04	14%	5 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	26%	28 Jun →