squppy

squppy — CS2 Stats

76561197986836861[U:1:26571133]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,306Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating24,933Top 25% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21441 of 228243 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,537 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 1 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,933 +1,970 2 Aug5 Sept · 11 days played
22,96324,933peak 24,9332 Aug5 Sept
24,933Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,537Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,537
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 214 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,933
  • +1,697 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 67 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsquppyFACEITLevel 8 · 1,537 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,933 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,537csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning64
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61381Last 10061%Win rateWWLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · +49ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 20

  • 155 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.4
Utility5.2
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time586ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · vertigo, 1 Aug
44%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · vertigo, 1 Sept
344msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 23 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
127In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2316770%0.02
mirageC156940%0.01
ancientS1510567%0.00
cacheB147750%0.03
nukeA85363%0.01
officeA74357%0.01
anubisS76186%0.05
infernoS64267%-0.00
vertigo31233%0.07
train110100%-0.02
shelter110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
68%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
84.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1861%1.1415.2
Ancient1580%1.0918.3
Anubis1457%1.5815.5
Dust21369%1.5419.0
Nuke475%1.5623.8
Cache475%1.0911.8
Inferno367%1.7719.7
Vertigo1100%1.7319.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
594msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.58HE damage / grenade
6.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7657% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–50.0113%13 Sept
cache13–30.0722%8 Sept
dust210–13-0.0328%8 Sept
inferno13–110.0322%8 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0320%7 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0122%7 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0122%7 Sept
dust211–130.0326%7 Sept
train13–4-0.0212%7 Sept
mirage5–130.0523%7 Sept
dust213–40.0116%6 Sept
office13–100.0422%6 Sept
dust29–130.0218%6 Sept
inferno13–90.0227%5 Sept
cache13–70.0318%5 Sept
cache13–40.0842%5 Sept
mirage6–130.0023%5 Sept
dust213–30.0120%4 Sept
cache13–90.0728%4 Sept
office13–50.0327%4 Sept
dust213–3-0.0231%4 Sept
inferno10–130.0221%4 Sept
dust213–90.0120%3 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0615%3 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0125%3 Sept
dust213–110.0318%1 Sept
mirage13–40.0617%1 Sept
cache8–130.0024%1 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0515%1 Sept
dust213–110.0122%1 Sept
vertigo2–13-0.0044%1 Sept
dust213–30.0622%31 Aug
anubis13–30.0514%31 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0529%31 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0133%31 Aug
dust212–120.0538%31 Aug
office0–8-0.0014%31 Aug
ancient13–100.0319%31 Aug
anubis13–60.0922%29 Aug
dust213–80.0623%29 Aug
cache13–50.1425%29 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0816%29 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0016%26 Aug
nuke8–130.0528%26 Aug
ancient13–110.0524%26 Aug
anubis13–70.0820%26 Aug
ancient13–100.0218%25 Aug
cache10–130.0015%25 Aug
anubis13–20.1127%25 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0021%25 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0326%25 Aug
dust213–11-0.0322%25 Aug
dust213–10.0339%24 Aug
cache13–100.0333%24 Aug
mirage6–130.0132%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.0019%24 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0336%23 Aug
dust213–8-0.0125%23 Aug
ancient22–20-0.0314%22 Aug
mirage13–60.1530%21 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0725%21 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0726%21 Aug
ancient13–70.0721%20 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0233%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0319%20 Aug
cache9–130.0317%20 Aug
cache13–20.0822%18 Aug
cache7–13-0.0617%18 Aug
dust216–140.0323%18 Aug
office13–50.0326%18 Aug
ancient13–110.0120%18 Aug
ancient13–60.0228%16 Aug
dust26–130.0617%16 Aug
mirage13–50.0724%16 Aug
dust213–60.0113%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0215%16 Aug
ancient10–130.0216%16 Aug
dust213–70.0516%15 Aug
nuke13–90.0529%12 Aug
anubis13–80.0220%12 Aug
mirage13–100.0223%9 Aug
office9–13-0.0517%9 Aug
cache7–13-0.0018%9 Aug
nuke13–30.0210%9 Aug
dust211–40.0124%9 Aug
office11–130.0223%2 Aug
dust213–110.0113%2 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0221%2 Aug
cache10–130.0229%2 Aug
ancient13–160.0028%2 Aug
nuke13–110.0017%2 Aug
ancient7–3-0.000%2 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0013%2 Aug
dust25–13-0.0513%2 Aug
vertigo5–130.0414%2 Aug
shelter13–30.0518%2 Aug
vertigo13–50.1532%1 Aug
office13–30.0111%1 Aug
nuke13–40.0127%1 Aug
cache11–13-0.0425%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →