Espia [ah]

Espia [ah] — CS2 Stats

ES76561197986692212[U:1:26426484]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,553Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,426Purple band · top ~18.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,366 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 28 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,426 +2,885 28 Aug16 Sept · 20 days played
13,82117,980peak 17,98028 Aug16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,366 +0 9 Sept14 Sept · 2 observations
1,3661,366peak 1,3669 Sept14 Sept
17,980Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,366Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,366
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 165 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 554 below peak (17,980)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,574 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEspia [ah]FACEITLevel 5 · 1,366 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,426 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,366csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning52
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55414Last 10055%Win rateLWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +69ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 685ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility4.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time614ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 30 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 1–10 · inferno, 15 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 5 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 76% over 17anubisWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB25131252%-0.00
ancientS1713476%-0.01
anubisB157847%-0.03
nukeA148657%0.00
mirageB105550%-0.02
dust2B105550%-0.02
cacheB84450%0.00
vertigo1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,741Matches
50%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
73.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno30560%0.9414.4
Ancient27950%0.9014.1
Anubis16556%0.8613.5
Nuke12943%0.9314.6
Mirage11444%1.0015.0
Dust26633%0.7811.9
Vertigo5334%0.8413.1
Cache2040%0.7012.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
72.1%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
615msReaction time
41.0%T opening success
47.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
10.78HE damage / grenade
6.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0719%16 Sept
anubis13–11-0.1026%16 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0213%16 Sept
cache7–130.0314%16 Sept
ancient13–10.0224%16 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0514%16 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0711%15 Sept
inferno11–130.0217%15 Sept
inferno1–10-0.0738%15 Sept
ancient13–80.027%13 Sept
inferno13–80.0126%13 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0317%12 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0816%12 Sept
cache9–130.0124%12 Sept
inferno13–50.0212%12 Sept
mirage10–130.0319%12 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0115%12 Sept
inferno9–130.0316%12 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0114%12 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0132%12 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0118%12 Sept
inferno9–13-0.1126%11 Sept
dust213–10-0.0114%11 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0414%11 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0117%11 Sept
anubis10–130.0012%11 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0421%10 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0125%10 Sept
dust215–150.0035%10 Sept
ancient13–50.0814%10 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0622%9 Sept
ancient13–8-0.049%9 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0019%9 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0625%8 Sept
nuke11–130.0329%8 Sept
cache13–80.0529%8 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0020%7 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0214%7 Sept
ancient16–120.0227%7 Sept
vertigo4–9-0.0821%7 Sept
mirage16–12-0.0517%6 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0513%6 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0422%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.0119%6 Sept
cache13–9-0.0128%6 Sept
anubis13–50.0314%6 Sept
anubis13–4-0.0417%6 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0215%6 Sept
ancient13–60.0214%6 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0724%5 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0215%5 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0617%5 Sept
anubis13–90.0017%5 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0321%5 Sept
dust216–140.0120%5 Sept
mirage13–30.0122%5 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0511%5 Sept
dust210–13-0.0017%4 Sept
ancient15–150.0221%4 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0320%4 Sept
inferno13–70.0424%4 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0422%4 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0518%3 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0215%3 Sept
nuke13–110.0029%3 Sept
nuke13–60.1020%3 Sept
dust29–13-0.1111%2 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0211%2 Sept
nuke13–60.0316%2 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0914%1 Sept
dust27–13-0.0222%1 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0312%1 Sept
cache13–50.0438%1 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0310%31 Aug
dust213–100.0221%31 Aug
ancient13–10-0.047%30 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0127%30 Aug
cache5–13-0.0534%30 Aug
ancient13–110.0114%30 Aug
inferno9–130.0419%30 Aug
nuke13–60.0319%30 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0426%30 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0820%30 Aug
mirage13–20.1620%30 Aug
nuke13–30.0114%30 Aug
inferno13–40.2238%30 Aug
ancient13–11-0.1214%29 Aug
cache13–11-0.0227%29 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0323%29 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0314%29 Aug
nuke10–130.0216%29 Aug
inferno13–80.0530%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0620%29 Aug
anubis10–130.0125%29 Aug
inferno13–100.0327%29 Aug
dust28–13-0.0024%29 Aug
mirage10–13-0.114%28 Aug
dust213–9-0.0612%28 Aug
inferno13–10.0220%28 Aug
cache10–13-0.0315%28 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →