∼*∼pyro∼*∼ — CS2 Stats

76561197985780433[U:1:25514705]✓ No bans

2,304Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating15,623Purple band · top ~25.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16230 of 26643 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,554 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG∼*∼pyro∼*∼FACEITLevel 7 · 1,554 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,623 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning50
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40537Last 10040%Win rateLWLLTLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression5.9
Utility6.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 672ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.0
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time681ms+31ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 681ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — inferno 13–6
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 50% over 24anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB24121250%-0.00
dust2C2181338%-0.01
infernoC1661038%-0.01
anubisD1331023%-0.02
ancientC104640%-0.03
nukeC83538%-0.01
mirage31233%-0.00
overpass32167%0.02
vertigo21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,819Matches
53%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
63.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient16954%0.9112.5
Inferno12350%0.8112.8
Anubis10550%0.8112.4
Dust24654%0.8212.0
Nuke2730%0.7611.3
Mirage1060%0.9812.1
Overpass922%0.729.6
Cache367%0.8011.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
672msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
18.2%Flash assists
11.61HE damage / grenade
4.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6113% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.0623%15 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0318%15 Aug
cache10–13-0.0229%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0126%15 Aug
cache12–12-0.0216%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.0724%14 Aug
mirage9–60.0117%10 Aug
dust213–30.0831%10 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0517%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0413%8 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0533%8 Aug
cache13–11-0.0218%8 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0219%8 Aug
dust28–130.0035%8 Aug
cache13–110.0321%7 Aug
inferno7–130.0119%6 Aug
cache13–50.0423%6 Aug
cache13–10-0.0126%5 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0927%4 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0221%2 Aug
cache13–5-0.0424%2 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0218%2 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0421%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0820%31 Jul
cache8–13-0.0313%31 Jul
dust213–8-0.0424%30 Jul
cache8–130.0422%30 Jul
inferno8–80.0319%30 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0429%30 Jul
anubis8–130.0321%26 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0516%26 Jul
cache13–9-0.0319%26 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0427%26 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0223%21 Jul
cache13–70.0013%9 Jul
cache13–50.0627%9 Jul
dust23–13-0.0223%9 Jul
cache2–13-0.1138%9 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0126%9 Jul
cache13–90.0616%9 Jul
cache4–130.0123%3 Jul
cache13–60.0327%3 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0118%3 Jul
dust29–13-0.0317%3 Jul
nuke10–130.0615%3 Jul
inferno10–130.0234%3 Jul
anubis13–110.0219%3 Jul
overpass15–15-0.0015%1 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0019%1 Jul
dust27–13-0.0135%30 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0436%30 Jun
dust210–13-0.0221%28 Jun
inferno11–130.0133%28 Jun
nuke13–50.0627%25 Jun
ancient13–50.0125%25 Jun
anubis13–80.0431%25 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0127%24 Jun
dust210–13-0.0413%24 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0325%23 Jun
dust213–100.0524%23 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0219%23 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0423%22 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0741%22 Jun
cache11–13-0.0225%20 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0126%20 Jun
cache13–10.0433%20 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0316%17 Jun
inferno13–60.0916%17 Jun
ancient13–10.0121%17 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0317%16 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0315%16 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0516%14 Jun
dust211–130.0128%14 Jun
dust212–12-0.0729%12 Jun
nuke9–130.0130%12 Jun
inferno9–130.0117%12 Jun
cache3–13-0.0741%12 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0320%11 Jun
ancient10–130.0022%11 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0631%11 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0515%11 Jun
cache12–120.0118%10 Jun
overpass13–80.0513%9 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0029%9 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0328%9 Jun
dust216–14-0.0122%7 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0528%7 Jun
dust213–11-0.0026%4 Jun
dust213–110.0122%4 Jun
dust213–4-0.0432%4 Jun
cache10–13-0.0419%4 Jun
dust213–20.0620%4 Jun
inferno9–130.0116%3 Jun
overpass13–90.0126%3 Jun
vertigo12–120.0124%3 Jun
vertigo13–60.0124%3 Jun
dust211–13-0.0016%29 May
cache13–80.0530%29 May
cache4–13-0.0217%29 May
cache9–130.0310%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →