hetz

hetz — CS2 Stats

76561197985172531[U:1:24906803]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,918Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,979 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,979 → 1,979
+29Tracked matches · now 1,918
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 12 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,490 +951 22 Feb – 14 Mar · 5 days played
25,41626,591peak 26,59122 Feb14 Mar
Faceit ELO: 1,979 +0 30 Aug – 6 Sept · 2 observations
1,9791,979peak 1,97930 Aug6 Sept
26,591Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,979Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-02-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,979
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 22 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhetzFACEITLevel 10 · 1,979 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,979csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning50
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–41Last 10059%Win rateLWWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · +44ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch1.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time554ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 25.3% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 28 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 24 Feb →
344msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 16 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 19 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3219–1359%0.00
mirageS2921–872%0.01
nukeS128–467%-0.01
ancientD103–730%-0.02
anubisD71–614%-0.04
infernoS54–180%-0.01
overpass—33–0100%0.03
cache—10–10%0.05
vertigo—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,182Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
77.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15948%1.0515.8
Dust215755%1.1616.0
Ancient8853%1.1716.2
Anubis6854%1.0113.8
Nuke6650%1.1015.3
Inferno3644%0.9515.1
Overpass1872%1.1715.2
Train1258%1.2716.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
558msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
7.05HE damage / grenade
10.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1446% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0611%21 Sept →
mirage13–90.0318%21 Sept →
dust213–80.0214%19 Sept →
dust214–160.0026%19 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0325%13 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0317%11 Sept →
dust219–150.0126%27 Aug →
dust213–80.0028%27 Aug →
dust213–100.0543%26 Aug →
mirage13–10.0433%26 Aug →
nuke6–130.0119%25 Aug →
anubis13–60.0338%25 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0518%22 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0322%21 Aug →
mirage8–130.0215%21 Aug →
dust213–0-0.0544%19 Aug →
dust213–1-0.0420%19 Aug →
mirage9–130.0127%17 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0731%16 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0233%12 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0137%12 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0332%12 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0324%9 Aug →
dust213–10.0947%7 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.1035%7 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0017%7 Aug →
dust211–130.0239%4 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0225%4 Aug →
inferno16–120.0122%3 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0429%29 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0211%29 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0318%29 Jul →
dust213–80.1235%28 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0531%27 Jul →
cache11–130.0532%26 Jul →
mirage13–90.0224%26 Jul →
dust213–80.0227%11 Jul →
dust21–120.0140%9 Jul →
mirage13–20.0830%9 Jul →
dust213–30.0616%9 Jul →
nuke13–10.0812%9 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0337%9 Jul →
dust213–40.0114%2 Jul →
ancient5–130.0022%17 Jun →
anubis13–16-0.0313%16 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0412%7 Jun →
overpass13–10.0419%7 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0525%29 May →
mirage16–13-0.0332%27 May →
ancient17–19-0.0414%27 May →
dust213–20.0419%25 May →
overpass13–6-0.0120%20 Mar →
inferno13–110.0039%20 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0513%20 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0424%18 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0325%18 Mar →
mirage13–3-0.0218%18 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0933%14 Mar →
mirage4–130.0117%14 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0829%13 Mar →
mirage13–60.0322%13 Mar →
mirage13–80.0444%13 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0522%9 Mar →
mirage13–110.0111%9 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0238%9 Mar →
nuke13–9-0.0118%7 Mar →
mirage13–80.0415%7 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0025%7 Mar →
mirage13–100.0236%7 Mar →
nuke13–80.0331%5 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0627%5 Mar →
nuke3–13-0.0915%4 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0813%4 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.1031%2 Mar →
mirage13–90.0219%27 Feb →
nuke13–70.0228%27 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0512%26 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0231%26 Feb →
dust213–30.0550%24 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0019%23 Feb →
mirage4–10.0840%22 Feb →
ancient13–40.0415%22 Feb →
nuke13–70.0745%22 Feb →
mirage13–50.0636%22 Feb →
dust213–100.0634%22 Feb →
dust27–130.0327%20 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0218%20 Feb →
inferno13–70.0226%20 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0515%20 Feb →
nuke13–40.0627%20 Feb →
overpass13–40.0515%20 Feb →
mirage13–30.0424%20 Feb →
dust213–60.0413%18 Feb →
vertigo9–130.0426%18 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0116%15 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0415%15 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0224%12 Feb →
mirage16–130.0218%12 Feb →
anubis1–13-0.0629%12 Feb →
ancient10–130.0433%12 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →