Mellis

Mellis — CS2 Stats

SE76561197984303357[U:1:24037629]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,077Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,840Purple band · top ~25.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,077 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 6 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,840 -342 6 Jun – 16 Sept · 19 days played
14,83317,190peak 17,1906 Jun16 Sept
17,450Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-06-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,350 below peak (17,190)
  • -1,003 over 30 days · declining
  • -389 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,160 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMellisFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,840 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning49
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–55–2Last 10043%Win rateWLLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −6.1pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility7.0
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.9
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time567ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 31 Jul →
26%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · dust2, 2 Sept →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 5 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 28 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC197–1237%-0.03
anubisD165–1131%-0.02
ancientC156–940%-0.03
cacheB158–753%-0.00
nukeA159–660%-0.02
dust2B115–645%-0.02
mirageC83–538%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

350Matches
53%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
64.6ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7050%0.8712.5
Inferno6453%0.9312.8
Nuke5443%0.9513.0
Ancient5357%0.8412.9
Anubis5265%1.0013.2
Dust23450%0.9012.6
Train729%0.8011.7
Cache757%1.1811.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.9%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
553msReaction time
23.0%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
8.64HE damage / grenade
13.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.9133% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.9716% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–13-0.0415%8 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0619%8 Sept →
inferno8–130.0217%8 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.037%5 Sept →
ancient13–90.023%5 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0110%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.024%5 Sept →
ancient13–50.1313%5 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.102%5 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.106%4 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.029%4 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0219%4 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0324%4 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.059%4 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0820%2 Sept →
dust213–110.0526%2 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0510%2 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0524%30 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.116%30 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0010%30 Aug →
inferno20–22-0.0013%28 Aug →
cache13–10.0718%28 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0118%28 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0510%26 Aug →
cache8–13-0.076%26 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.033%26 Aug →
nuke17–19-0.0210%26 Aug →
cache13–70.0513%25 Aug →
nuke13–100.018%25 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0411%22 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0518%22 Aug →
cache13–10.0020%22 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.059%22 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0313%22 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.069%22 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.098%22 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0620%22 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.084%22 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.068%21 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0212%21 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0017%20 Aug →
cache11–130.0615%20 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.049%20 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0112%20 Aug →
inferno9–130.0122%8 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0125%8 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0411%8 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0318%7 Aug →
nuke9–130.0010%7 Aug →
cache13–110.0113%5 Aug →
inferno13–60.0125%3 Aug →
mirage13–10.0812%3 Aug →
ancient13–100.017%3 Aug →
cache13–60.1317%31 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0011%31 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0011%31 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.017%31 Jul →
inferno10–130.048%31 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0018%31 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.028%31 Jul →
dust27–13-0.129%29 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0818%29 Jul →
anubis13–90.0113%28 Jul →
cache13–11-0.036%28 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0410%28 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0315%28 Jul →
cache13–50.0614%28 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.059%28 Jul →
anubis10–130.014%28 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0510%25 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0413%25 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0411%25 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0924%24 Jul →
mirage13–10.027%24 Jul →
dust213–40.0625%24 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0611%24 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0618%8 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.009%8 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0313%8 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0614%7 Jul →
inferno0–13-0.0924%7 Jul →
anubis13–50.0419%7 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0711%7 Jul →
cache9–13-0.103%7 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0411%23 Jun →
nuke13–60.1013%21 Jun →
anubis12–16-0.0218%20 Jun →
nuke13–50.0610%20 Jun →
ancient12–16-0.0414%19 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0116%19 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0412%19 Jun →
overpass13–16-0.0612%18 Jun →
inferno13–80.0713%18 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0619%14 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0118%14 Jun →
anubis5–130.0217%14 Jun →
inferno13–16-0.0412%14 Jun →
inferno1–13-0.0415%12 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0922%6 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.082%6 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →