phnz

phnz — CS2 Stats

NO76561197982776291[U:1:22510563]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,382Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,291Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26585 of 224821 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,194 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 14 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,291 +700 11 Aug18 Sept · 5 days played
23,59124,772peak 24,77211 Aug18 Sept
24,813Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,194Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-02-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,194
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 306 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 481 below peak (24,772)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 709 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGphnzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,194 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,291 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,194csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning57
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5644Last 10056%Win rateLLWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −13.0pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 462ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 460ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 462ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility6.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.7
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time504ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 540ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 7 Jul
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 14 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 88% over 8nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA27161159%0.00
mirageB179853%0.01
dust2A138562%0.02
nukeD93633%0.01
anubisD93633%0.01
infernoC94544%-0.01
overpassS87188%0.00
cacheS75271%0.01
vertigo110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,269Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
72.5ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient32746%1.0615.0
Anubis25554%1.1116.4
Inferno20148%1.1515.6
Dust220048%1.1516.0
Nuke18155%1.1615.6
Mirage12439%1.0015.0
Overpass12165%1.1415.9
Vertigo5853%0.9815.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
72.6%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
496msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
17.8%Flash assists
5.18HE damage / grenade
14.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0564% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–13-0.0217%15 Sept
ancient9–130.006%10 Sept
mirage13–50.0423%10 Sept
mirage5–130.0914%10 Sept
ancient4–13-0.060%8 Sept
mirage16–120.0113%3 Sept
dust211–130.1325%31 Aug
anubis3–130.0920%31 Aug
mirage9–130.0822%30 Aug
ancient13–20.0620%30 Aug
ancient13–50.0228%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0245%11 Aug
ancient13–100.0738%11 Aug
cache13–10-0.0137%9 Aug
ancient13–50.0118%9 Aug
nuke13–60.0828%8 Aug
cache13–9-0.0119%8 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0533%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.0229%4 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0014%4 Aug
dust212–16-0.0139%4 Aug
anubis13–50.0024%3 Aug
dust213–16-0.0416%3 Aug
inferno10–130.0135%3 Aug
cache16–120.0017%3 Aug
mirage13–10.1026%3 Aug
inferno13–20.0830%2 Aug
dust213–50.0316%2 Aug
nuke8–130.0128%2 Aug
cache13–20.0325%2 Aug
ancient13–60.1321%2 Aug
ancient13–7-0.075%27 Jul
ancient13–80.0822%26 Jul
inferno2–5-0.0719%24 Jul
vertigo13–4-0.0135%7 Jul
overpass13–80.1031%7 Jul
nuke13–90.0432%7 Jul
cache13–20.1641%7 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0217%5 Jul
dust213–2-0.0124%1 Jul
mirage10–130.0225%1 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0513%29 Jun
dust213–110.0022%26 Jun
ancient10–130.0230%17 Jun
mirage8–130.0037%17 Jun
ancient13–110.0322%14 Jun
inferno13–80.0453%14 Jun
nuke4–130.0424%14 Jun
ancient13–100.0047%13 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0123%13 Jun
nuke13–160.0345%13 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0232%13 Jun
mirage13–40.0333%13 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0717%12 Jun
ancient20–22-0.0313%12 Jun
mirage12–160.0517%8 Jun
anubis11–130.0326%6 Jun
ancient13–50.1315%3 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0324%31 May
dust27–13-0.0114%24 May
ancient13–60.0437%14 May
anubis13–16-0.0224%14 May
cache4–13-0.0829%8 May
overpass13–9-0.0519%5 May
dust213–10-0.0012%5 May
dust213–100.0319%26 Apr
dust213–110.0318%26 Apr
ancient13–2-0.048%26 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0238%23 Apr
overpass13–90.0518%22 Apr
overpass19–170.0123%20 Apr
ancient13–50.0138%17 Apr
dust211–13-0.0219%9 Apr
anubis13–100.0621%9 Apr
ancient6–130.0133%9 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0332%26 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0628%26 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0610%26 Mar
dust213–60.1033%19 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0223%19 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0421%19 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0630%14 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0314%7 Mar
dust213–90.0331%2 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0316%1 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0019%1 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0137%28 Feb
ancient10–13-0.078%25 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0120%25 Feb
inferno5–130.0125%25 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0213%25 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0129%25 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0235%25 Feb
nuke13–90.0222%21 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0420%15 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0523%15 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0413%14 Feb
overpass13–80.0421%14 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0229%14 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0729%14 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →